[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

GameThread: Must win game 2? 8pm TNT 5/23
Author Thread
Knicksfan
Posts: 33457
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
5/24/2025  3:25 AM
shinmen wrote:They probably blew a very achievable path to the finals. They beat the champions. The pacers are not that good. I'm not sure we're gonna have healthy kat and og every year.

Good point, but I’m honestly down on OG. He seems to be unpredictable no matter how healthy he is. He is too much of an important part of this team to be such a disappearing act for many games.

And yeah, the coaching. This is why I would honestly make a move for another coach. Not Malone, who will probably be Thibs 2.0, but there needs to be a change. When at this point of the season you have no idea what kind of performance you’ll get from a team and there are hardly any adjustments done in terms of lineups, it’s the coaching.

Knicks_Fan
AUTOADVERT
Knicksfan
Posts: 33457
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
5/24/2025  3:35 AM
Indiana eliminates you last season when you pushed them to 7 but were very injured. This year you beat all the odds and defeat a very good young team and a great defending champion. You have home court advantage and are healthy. You have a real chance at a championship for the first time in forever. And just for emphasis I repeat, you are facing the team that eliminated you last season. You come out of the gate with two games like this? You have an all-time choke and, more disappointing than that, you roll out and die in Game 2? WHAT A FREAKING HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT!

I hated, HATED how inconsistent and unfocused this team showed to be during the season. I was hoping we were finally maturing in the playoffs. Other than a few bad games, it seemed like we were. That Game 6 versus Boston, especially the second half, really made me believe for the first time in the season. Yeah, I knew they had potential, but it was finally being put on the court. It was beautiful.

But we are back to the clown show that doesn’t know wtf they are doing and shoots itself in the foot instead of regrouping and showing what they are truly capable off. And for however flawed this team is, when the pieces are used the right way, they are truly good. But we have seen it only in glimpses. I thought we had turned the page after the Boston series. I believed.

Whatever goodwill they had earned so far has died after these two games.

Knicks_Fan
Alpha1971
Posts: 23309
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/17/2022
Member: #9006

5/24/2025  4:02 AM
I slept thru the game as per my playoff superstition and we lost !! Oh ****. I guess superstitions don't work,
Clean
Posts: 30300
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
5/24/2025  5:10 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/24/2025  5:20 AM
This is why I had to stop talking Knicks here. I was getting pissed people telling me I have an agenda just because I was pointing out all the dumb **** Thibs been doing. The same dumb **** that non Knick fans are pointing out now that the world is focused on the Knicks. The same dumb **** that might have killed our best chance in decades of reaching the Finals.

My only agenda has been wanting to win and not being afraid to tell the truth when I think someone is holding us back. You really think the same person who went back to Randle when Obi was having a career game and randle was having one of his worst games was ever going to change the starting lineup until it was to late? That was a microcasm of the starting lineup problem now.

How many arguements did I have years ago because of that? Fans get too attached to players and coaches and become too blind to their faults. I am only attached to wanting to win. This is the main reason why I never liked this team. We have a lot of talent but they are not being used correctly to max out their potential. The idiot picked a starting lineup in training camp and never tried anything else the whole damn year. We started out with amazing offense and once teams adjusted he never adjusted back. How was there people defending him? The same defense for years that made us give up open 3 that made us one the worst at that every year. Yet people still defended him.

Clean
Posts: 30300
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
5/24/2025  5:41 AM
ToddTT
Posts: 30417
Alba Posts: 53
Joined: 8/30/2001
Member: #105
5/24/2025  6:23 AM
Clean wrote:This is why I had to stop talking Knicks here. I was getting pissed people telling me I have an agenda just because I was pointing out all the dumb **** Thibs been doing. The same dumb **** that non Knick fans are pointing out now that the world is focused on the Knicks. The same dumb **** that might have killed our best chance in decades of reaching the Finals.

My only agenda has been wanting to win and not being afraid to tell the truth when I think someone is holding us back. You really think the same person who went back to Randle when Obi was having a career game and randle was having one of his worst games was ever going to change the starting lineup until it was to late? That was a microcasm of the starting lineup problem now.

How many arguements did I have years ago because of that? Fans get too attached to players and coaches and become too blind to their faults. I am only attached to wanting to win. This is the main reason why I never liked this team. We have a lot of talent but they are not being used correctly to max out their potential. The idiot picked a starting lineup in training camp and never tried anything else the whole damn year. We started out with amazing offense and once teams adjusted he never adjusted back. How was there people defending him? The same defense for years that made us give up open 3 that made us one the worst at that every year. Yet people still defended him.

You say “I” a lot.

And you often seem to be having a conversation with yourself.

Oh good lord... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XkmGrX7O0lQ
Clean
Posts: 30300
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
5/24/2025  6:45 AM
You right, I use forums to get stuff off my chest about sports. It is what it is.
SergioNYK
Posts: 22524
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2002
Member: #333
USA
5/24/2025  7:54 AM
shinmen wrote:They probably blew a very achievable path to the finals. They beat the champions. The pacers are not that good. I'm not sure we're gonna have healthy kat and og every year.

As much as we hate the Pacers, they are good. You don't get to where they are without being good.

nycericanguy
Posts: 21630
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/20/2023
Member: #9127

5/24/2025  7:54 AM
KAT puts up an efficient 20 & 10 but it really makes you realize how much defense matters. Because Mitch has been more impactful these playoffs.

I was dead wrong about how fine we'd be without Ihart.

I think if you can trade KAT and one of Mikal/OG for Giannis you gotta do it.

SergioNYK
Posts: 22524
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2002
Member: #333
USA
5/24/2025  7:56 AM
Knicksfan wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:The last thing I was expecting tonight was Siakim putting 39 on OG on 15-23.

Honestly, OG has been a huge disappointment this series.

Overall, for however great he is in wins, he is a disappearing act in losses. He asked for his contract and it’s showing he is far from fully earning it. Something is wrong with him that makes him so inconsistent. But then again, same can be said about Mikal and KAT.

This team has been either world beaters or a freaking mess with nothing in between, and it seems that all their terrible act is coming up in this series. What a freaking disappointment! I’m so tired of their unpredictable act. Really, really tired of it.

Agreed. I actually blame him the most for why we are down 0-2. In game one, it was him checking Nesmith and dropped in coverage and didn't respect him and got burned. And he missed that clutch FT. And last night, he did not play with enough urgency or motor. Siakim ate him alive all game long. OG was brought here to stop scorers like him and he failed. We need him to be A LOT better in game three and the rest of this series, especially on defense.

DLeethal
Posts: 22888
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/19/2023
Member: #9126

5/24/2025  7:56 AM
No lineup in basketball has played more than the starting five for the New York Knicks. The group of Jalen Brunson, Josh Hart, Mikal Bridges, OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns played 940 minutes during the regular season, and only two other lineups played even half as many minutes. It's a Tom Thibodeau cliché at this point. No coach in the NBA clings as desperately to his best players as Thibodeau does.

He's been a head coach for 12 full seasons and one of his players has led the NBA in minutes per game in four of them. Even when they don't, several are often near the top of their list. His 2018 Timberwolves starters also led all NBA lineups in total minutes. This is perhaps his defining trait as a coach.

It's also probably going to cost him his first trip to the NBA Finals.

Almost every lineup the Knicks are putting on the floor this postseason is working. Of the 18 most-used lineups New York has thrown out there in the playoffs, 12 have a positive point-differential and a 13th is neutral. Of the five negatives, three have only been outscored by single digits. A fourth has only played 11 minutes.

But the fifth is by far the most-used, and -- based on the first two paragraphs -- you probably know which group I'm talking about. New York's starters have played 308 minutes in the postseason and been outscored by 50 points.

This is basically statistically impossible. The last lineup to go minus-50 or worse was Oklahoma City's starting lineup in the Orlando bubble back in 2020. Lineup data has been tracked since 2008, and since then only seven lineups besides New York's starters have reached the minus-50 threshold in a single postseason. Of those groups, only one other -- the starters for the 2018-19 Portland Trail Blazers -- played more than 200 minutes within that postseason. There's an easy logic to that fact. Generally speaking, if a lineup is playing that badly in the postseason, the team is smart enough to stop using it. If they aren't, they're just eliminated before they can rack up lofty minutes or negative plus-minus totals.

That's what's so maddening here. Every other lineup the Knicks are using is working. But they keep going back to a group that isn't, and hasn't for quite some time. New York's starters dominated December with a plus-63 point-differential in 241 minutes. Otherwise, the group has been pedestrian at best, not going a single month with a better point-differential than plus-15. Entering the Eastern Conference finals, it had been outscored by double digits in four of New York's first 12 playoff games.

In Game 1 of the Pacers series, New York won the minutes it played with at least one reserve in the game by 13 points. The Knicks lost the game by three points because the starters went minus-16. Before Game 2, Thibodeau said that "everything is always on the table" when it comes to lineup changes.

He proceeded to stick with the same group for Game 2. It played the first seven minutes and 18 seconds of Game 1 and was outscored by eight points. The lineups featuring at least one non-starter proceeded to build a three-point halftime lead. Thibodeau went back to the starters at the beginning of the third quarter and gave them seven minutes and 42 seconds of playing time. That three-point halftime lead became a two-point deficit.

Thibodeau finally seemed to learn his lesson from there, sticking with lineups featuring at least one reserve the rest of the way. The damage was done. Through two games, the Knicks have won the minutes they've played without their starting lineup on the floor by 21 points. They're trailing 2-0 in the series because Thibodeau has refused to make a change.

When Mikal Bridges was asked about the starters' struggles following Game 2, he explained that he felt that "maybe we're just playing too soft at the beginning of the halves." That is an understatement. This lineup can't stop a nosebleed. Its 117.6 defensive rating in the playoffs would rank 26th in the NBA during the regular season.

That's part of what's so befuddling. Thibodeau is a defensive-minded coach. The two reserves New York has leaned on all postseason, Miles McBride and Mitchell Robinson, are playing great defensively this postseason. Indiana's offense works in part because everybody can handle the ball. Hart, while a strong help-defender, does not generate as much pressure on the ball as McBride does. He's also guarded less on the perimeter, clogging the paint for Towns and Brunson. Hart is an incredibly important player for New York both overall and in this series. It has become painfully obvious during this postseason, however, that he is not best-utilized playing alongside New York's other starters. His energy is just more powerful off of the bench.

If McBride doesn't join the starting lineup, Robinson probably should. Aside from providing necessary rim-protection, New York's major advantage in this series is rebounding. The Pacers ranked 28th in rebounding rate during the season. When Robinson has been on the floor in this series, the Knicks are pulling in 58.8% of available rebounds. That falls to 50.5% when he sits. The Pacers have been the better team in a number of ways in this series. If the Knicks can't press the advantages they do have, they can't win four out of five games to salvage the series.

By bringing Robinson off of the bench, Thibodeau is limiting how many effective minutes he can play. Robinson played 29 minutes in Game 2, the most he's played all postseason. But because those minutes came off of the bench, they basically all had to come in succession. Robinson entered Game 1 with 5:19 remaining in the first half and left with 1:42 remaining in the second quarter. That's 16 consecutive minutes of game time for someone who didn't debut this season until the end of February and isn't used to those type of minutes to begin with. He isn't conditioned to play that many minutes in a row.

Sure enough, he wore down. New York won the Robinson minutes by 13 in the first half, but lost them by seven in the second. If Robinson were starting, Thibodeau could at least find him more rest between these lengthy stints.

This doesn't even need to be a matter of players needing to get substantially more or fewer minutes. It's the alignment that matters so much. All five Knicks starters are critical for different reasons. As a group, they just don't work as well as any other combination alongside either Robinson or McBride. But even when Thibodeau finds units that work, he isn't sticking with them. The Knicks lost the nine minutes Brunson rested by nine points in Game 2. In Game 1, the Brunson-less lineup of Towns, Anunoby, Hart, Robinson and McBride outscored the Pacers by 11 points. Yet Thibodeau didn't even use it in Game 2 for reasons that remain unclear.

In most cases, judging coaches so overtly is unfair. A lot of what they do is invisible, and that can blow the visible components of their job out of proportion. A single lineup decision in a single game rarely warrants this degree of scrutiny. But this isn't just a single decision in a single game. There are months of data at this point screaming that New York's starting five is not working. It has been the single dominant storyline of their postseason. Fans have been begging him to make a change, and if he had, the Knicks might be two wins away from the Finals right now.

Instead, they're two losses away from elimination with three road games in this series still ahead of them. Knowing which players to put on the court is about as straightforward a measure of coaching quality as exists in this sport. Nothing else matters if you're using the wrong players. And in that regard, Thibodeau is almost empirically coaching the Knicks out of this series.

DLeethal
Posts: 22888
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/19/2023
Member: #9126

5/24/2025  7:59 AM
If the Knicks blow it this year they need to make a splash this offseason because the window will likely be open again next year. They cannot look at this defense and think let’s run it back.
DLeethal
Posts: 22888
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/19/2023
Member: #9126

5/24/2025  8:01 AM
Honestly OG has been subpar ever since he pulled his hammy against Boston. That was an odd situation where he left the game went to locker room and came back and seemingly no injury but his game plummeted sinxe
SergioNYK
Posts: 22524
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2002
Member: #333
USA
5/24/2025  8:03 AM
I will say although is looks bleak, this series is NOT over. We can definitely win at Indiana. We actually play better on the road.
DLeethal
Posts: 22888
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/19/2023
Member: #9126

5/24/2025  8:06 AM
It’s a shame because we are getting heroics from Brunson averaging 40, major production from KAT on offense, Mikal went off last night, Deuce and Mitch have been awesome. And we’re down 0 ****ing 2. In many ways our guys are playing better than they did in rounds 1 and 2. To me it’s 10000% on the one lineup digging holes we can’t get out of anymore. Somehow we got out of them in the first 2 rounds. You eliminate that lineup and every other combo is beating the crap out of Indiana.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33457
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
5/24/2025  8:07 AM
nycericanguy wrote:KAT puts up an efficient 20 & 10 but it really makes you realize how much defense matters. Because Mitch has been more impactful these playoffs.

I was dead wrong about how fine we'd be without Ihart.

I think if you can trade KAT and one of Mikal/OG for Giannis you gotta do it.

I dont love the starpuch route, but this might be a way to go if its even possible. KAT has been as good as possible on offense, but really disappointing on defense and basketball IQ. Mikal/OG are good, but too much of a question mark to be untradeable assets.

Knicks_Fan
DLeethal
Posts: 22888
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/19/2023
Member: #9126

5/24/2025  8:08 AM
SergioNYK wrote:I will say although is looks bleak, this series is NOT over. We can definitely win at Indiana. We actually play better on the road.

It’s possible if Thibs coaches to the data we can still take this because the Mitch/Deuce lineups have been dominant. He has no choice but to make a seismic move now hoping for a seismic outcome

nycericanguy
Posts: 21630
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/20/2023
Member: #9127

5/24/2025  8:08 AM
KAT is the real issue in the starting 5, its just harder and harder to have a 5 that cant defend, teams will constantly look to isolate and pick at him. Even when he gives us 30 you still feel better with Mitch out there. Like we are going to score 110 points with or without KAT when you think about it, it comes down to defense.
Chandler
Posts: 26773
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

5/24/2025  8:08 AM
I don't know how to find this data but my eyeballs told me that we had much better success with Mitch on Siakam than OG on him. Siakam is very loooong

I think OG is certainly strong enough, and has the foot speed, but he lost that matchup

if went double big, why wouldn't we have KAT on Miles, and Mitch on Siakam.

other random thoughts, I know pace of game will be crucial given Pacers depth, but am I correct that we are not opportunistically running? Not sure Hart has done one of his coast to coast specials more than once or twice this series. On the other hand, as someone noted last night, we'll work our butt off for a bucket and Pacers will run on made baskets. Use leakouts etc.

ALso, also, these games are tight. It's extra frustrating to lose because you know if only there wasn't that careless turnover, or blown layup. But it also signals this is an issue of small adjustment and discipline/execution. How would you feel if we were getting blown out of the water from the opening tip?

We dug a huge hole for ourselves but I think we have a lot of high character guys to make it possible. As I think EwingGlass said our top 7 is better. I think that's a great point and agree 100%. Thus far my biggest concern is Carlisle and his staff are doing slightly better than ours. We're spotting them like 10 points at the beginning of the game. We're letting good players (Siakam and Nesmith are good, not scrubs) go off like they were Steph or Lebron. Continue to think Thibs is missing someone like J.Bryant telling him things in real time to make better, quicker adjustments. The story Line of game 1 is how does Nesmith get 20 points in the fourth quarter. How does Siakam get whatever he had (23?) in the first half. they're good but not that good.

let's keep our chins up and hope we turn it around. I think it was game 1 of the Celtics where we had like a 1% chance of winning at one point yet we won. Pacers had less than 1% chance in game 1 yet came back. Our chance of winning the series is higher than that. The tide can turn

(5)(7)
nycericanguy
Posts: 21630
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/20/2023
Member: #9127

5/24/2025  8:09 AM
OG has always been inconsistent.
GameThread: Must win game 2? 8pm TNT 5/23

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy