[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

BREAKING: Woj: Knicks/Bulls advanced talks for Rose
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/22/2016  8:16 PM
CashMoney wrote:Listening to the radio on the way home from work you'd think we traded Porzingis! Someone tweeted we just broke up out BIG 3! LOL

Exactly the big 3 that led us to 32wins and a 3rd straight year not making the playoffs! And they were taking up valuable capspace which we need to significantly improve

AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/22/2016  8:19 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I just saw the news. Are people really defending this trade? Are people really defending Phil? Phil just continue to make dumb mistake after dumb mistake. This is the same old knick, no culture change at all. Phil gave up Lopez for a player who has a name and no game. They traded for a bum. This is said day yo.

This is actually good news! It shows that Phil is actually working with his Head Coach in trying to put a team together that he can EXCEL with. You have to understand the signals this is sending about how Phil is approaching this team for the present and future. He sold RoLo HIGH, and got a PG for his coach with no long term detriment to the team. If Rose doesn't work out the team has MASSIVE cap space next summer. For now this might help to attract FA's and we still have our cap space to sign top FA's. It at least shows that the Knicks are going to be aggressive in trying to improve the team.

This made me laugh out loud. You are not serious? I think you are smarter than this. This is a bad move. He sold Lopez low when he had vlue. He brought back the worst starting PG in the NBA. Maybe the worst PG in the nba. The knicks could have gotten way more for Lopez and Grant if all they wanted was cap space.

I am not a man who uses cuss words but this had me thinking of some and then asking for forgiveness. I don't take sports too serious but this has really gotten to me. This is worse than the Bargnani trade!

simple question. If Rose plays like he did once the mask came off this is a decent trade, at worst a lateral move. The downside is obvious... physically history tells us he's a ticking time bomb. He's also young, and coming off a strong finish. The downside is the Knicks wasted a good rotation player and prospect many of us (myself included)liked on a one year bust that could even hurt chemistry. If that is the case can they recover? Yes. Do they lose a pick? No, so this is NOTHING like the Bargs trade.

So at worst is a minor setback. No franchise players or all stars were lost. No future payments pending. No picks lost to hurt us later.

At glance it looks lateral. Rose plays 68 games, puts up 18ppg, 5assist and shoots 48% playing well under Jeff. His scoring wins us some games, his presence frees things up late for Melo and KP, he makes the Knicks better as guard was so bad last year. Remember Jeff has roster input. Rose isnt a Knick if Jeff doesnt want him here.

Then there is this. God forbid at 27 years old he's physically ok. He is a very very hard working player. There is a chance the Knicks get an all star guard for spare parts. What is that chance? I dont know... 1-5? 1-10? If your an angry Knick fan its 1-100000. If you are a bull fan is even money. Let me just say Bull fans are not happy. At a rate of about 80% hating it and 20% acccepting it. The think the Knicks got Derrick Rose for trash. Just a little perspective. Dont believe me? Go read the thread on the Bull's forum on realgm that had 25 pages 20 minutes after the trade was announced

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/22/2016  8:19 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2016  8:22 PM
Chandler wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Let me remind everyone that Grant was a late 1st round pick. You'd think he was a lottery pick with the way everyone is crying about losing him. What PG picked post-lottery became a significant player other than Rondo who was the ultimate diamond in the rough?

depends on what you mean by significant:
tony parker (28)
steve nash (15)
jeff teague (19)
dennis shroeder (17)
george hill (26)
isaih thomas (boston)(2d round)

Ok that's quite a few more than I thought but those guys showed more upside their rookie year than Grant. Especially perimeter shooting.

I've got a bunch Grant never amounts to more than a backup if he even sticks on an nba roster

fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/22/2016  8:21 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
Chandler wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Let me remind everyone that Grant was a late 1st round pick. You'd think he was a lottery pick with the way everyone is crying about losing him. What PG picked post-lottery became a significant player other than Rondo who was the ultimate diamond in the rough?

depends on what you mean by significant:
tony parker (28)
steve nash (15)
jeff teague (19)
dennis shroeder (17)
george hill (26)
isaih thomas (boston)(2d round)

Ok that's quite a few more than I thought but those guys showed more upside their rookie year than Grant. Especially perimeter shooting

Grant could be a very good player. He could also be Earl Watson. Time will tell... thats the thing with prospects
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
KncksbigKATS
Posts: 20863
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/15/2011
Member: #3745

6/22/2016  8:23 PM
My take?
Now that Rose is aboard, the next move is likely for Horford or Whiteside.
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships." -Michael Jordan
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/22/2016  8:25 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2016  8:28 PM
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Chandler wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Let me remind everyone that Grant was a late 1st round pick. You'd think he was a lottery pick with the way everyone is crying about losing him. What PG picked post-lottery became a significant player other than Rondo who was the ultimate diamond in the rough?

depends on what you mean by significant:
tony parker (28)
steve nash (15)
jeff teague (19)
dennis shroeder (17)
george hill (26)
isaih thomas (boston)(2d round)

Ok that's quite a few more than I thought but those guys showed more upside their rookie year than Grant. Especially perimeter shooting

Grant could be a very good player. He could also be Earl Watson. Time will tell... thats the thing with prospects

Yea even if he becomes a player one day you have to do this deal. The Bulls took a lot of long term salary off our hands and we didn't have to take back a bad contract or give up a pick like in the past. It's a no brainer!

There was. I guarantee Conley was signing here. I much rather have the max money to go balls out for the epic FA class of 2017 and we have our draft pick!

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

6/22/2016  8:26 PM
fishmike wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I just saw the news. Are people really defending this trade? Are people really defending Phil? Phil just continue to make dumb mistake after dumb mistake. This is the same old knick, no culture change at all. Phil gave up Lopez for a player who has a name and no game. They traded for a bum. This is said day yo.

This is actually good news! It shows that Phil is actually working with his Head Coach in trying to put a team together that he can EXCEL with. You have to understand the signals this is sending about how Phil is approaching this team for the present and future. He sold RoLo HIGH, and got a PG for his coach with no long term detriment to the team. If Rose doesn't work out the team has MASSIVE cap space next summer. For now this might help to attract FA's and we still have our cap space to sign top FA's. It at least shows that the Knicks are going to be aggressive in trying to improve the team.

This made me laugh out loud. You are not serious? I think you are smarter than this. This is a bad move. He sold Lopez low when he had vlue. He brought back the worst starting PG in the NBA. Maybe the worst PG in the nba. The knicks could have gotten way more for Lopez and Grant if all they wanted was cap space.

I am not a man who uses cuss words but this had me thinking of some and then asking for forgiveness. I don't take sports too serious but this has really gotten to me. This is worse than the Bargnani trade!

simple question. If Rose plays like he did once the mask came off this is a decent trade, at worst a lateral move. The downside is obvious... physically history tells us he's a ticking time bomb. He's also young, and coming off a strong finish. The downside is the Knicks wasted a good rotation player and prospect many of us (myself included)liked on a one year bust that could even hurt chemistry. If that is the case can they recover? Yes. Do they lose a pick? No, so this is NOTHING like the Bargs trade.

So at worst is a minor setback. No franchise players or all stars were lost. No future payments pending. No picks lost to hurt us later.

At glance it looks lateral. Rose plays 68 games, puts up 18ppg, 5assist and shoots 48% playing well under Jeff. His scoring wins us some games, his presence frees things up late for Melo and KP, he makes the Knicks better as guard was so bad last year. Remember Jeff has roster input. Rose isnt a Knick if Jeff doesnt want him here.

Then there is this. God forbid at 27 years old he's physically ok. He is a very very hard working player. There is a chance the Knicks get an all star guard for spare parts. What is that chance? I dont know... 1-5? 1-10? If your an angry Knick fan its 1-100000. If you are a bull fan is even money. Let me just say Bull fans are not happy. At a rate of about 80% hating it and 20% acccepting it. The think the Knicks got Derrick Rose for trash. Just a little perspective. Dont believe me? Go read the thread on the Bull's forum on realgm that had 25 pages 20 minutes after the trade was announced

IF Rose performs well the trade is still garbage. If Rose does bad and come off the books the trade is still garbage. Why, because Rose value is below Lopez, Grant, and Calderon. IF you wanted cap space trade Lopez for a lottery pick and trad grant for another pick and just let Calderon come off the books.


This is not a lateral move it is a dumb move showing how incompetent Phil is as the Prez. He doesn't know how to value players. This is like most of his silly trades.

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

6/22/2016  8:28 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Chandler wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Let me remind everyone that Grant was a late 1st round pick. You'd think he was a lottery pick with the way everyone is crying about losing him. What PG picked post-lottery became a significant player other than Rondo who was the ultimate diamond in the rough?

depends on what you mean by significant:
tony parker (28)
steve nash (15)
jeff teague (19)
dennis shroeder (17)
george hill (26)
isaih thomas (boston)(2d round)

Ok that's quite a few more than I thought but those guys showed more upside their rookie year than Grant. Especially perimeter shooting

Grant could be a very good player. He could also be Earl Watson. Time will tell... thats the thing with prospects

Yea even if he becomes a player one day you have to do this deal. The Bulls took a lot of long term salary off our hands and we didn't have to take back a bad contract or give up a pick like in the past. It's a no brained!

its not like lopez was a useless piece of ****. Sure he got off to a slow start but then played well. He also helped KP. His contract is pretty reasonable. Its not like the bulls did us a favor. They got a good C on a reasonsble contract,a young pg with upside, and didnt give up a 1st
fitzfarm
Posts: 25285
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

6/22/2016  8:29 PM
Yea I know we traded a serviceable starting center, a career role player in grant,and the worst starting pg in the nba in Jose(who will probably be released).

For Derrick rose who if healthy is a top pg . But even if he goes out with a injury, still gives us great cap flexibility. And hey Durant, derozen or any of the top tier free agents who do you want as your floor general Jose or a former mvp and supposed healthy Derrick rose?

Also how long were we going to keep Lopez knowing KP is the future center . Who is already looking bigger.

A front court of KP,melo,Durant would go down in history as one of the best front courts ever add a healthy rose to the back court and we are contenders

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/22/2016  8:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2016  9:05 PM
Chandler wrote:
nixluva wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
SocraticBallin22 wrote:For those who are not aware, point guards like Westbrook, Curry, Paul and Lowry will be unrestricted free agents in 2017 and we will have 60 million dollars of cap space after this deal (and we only gave up Rolo and Grant). Winning!

We had plenty of cap space for LeBron in 2010. How did that work out for us? Just because we have cap space doesnt necessarily mean that we will attract the best FAs.

Beats missing the playoffs 3 straight years with no pick and limited cap space!

Right because first round exit will do wonders for us when we do actually have a pick

It will help attack top free agents and we will actually have ample cap space to offer. VS hoping for megastars to sign take less money just to try to make he playoffs with Lopez and an aging Melo.

What's It to like?

Bottomless cap space, lottery pick or both


Phil has made a deal that really has no major downside. Rose balls out and we win, GREAT! Rose falters and we move on, GREAT! Cap space in a great FA market and our picks as well. There's really no way to lose. Also it's possible that FA's will be much more impressed with coming to the Knicks with Rose, KP and Melo on board. It starts to look like a monster team if you add a top FA to this group. I think it's a good move.

this is my thinking too. ANd if ROse balls out we're in the best position. We will know more about him as a player, health, and I believe we could offer him more money if he plays crazy good, right?

If he can stay relatively healthy the skies the limit!

We need those Phoenix doctors that saved Grant Hill, Penny & Amare!

Chandler
Posts: 26910
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

6/22/2016  8:31 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
Chandler wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Let me remind everyone that Grant was a late 1st round pick. You'd think he was a lottery pick with the way everyone is crying about losing him. What PG picked post-lottery became a significant player other than Rondo who was the ultimate diamond in the rough?

depends on what you mean by significant:
tony parker (28)
steve nash (15)
jeff teague (19)
dennis shroeder (17)
george hill (26)
isaih thomas (boston)(2d round)

Ok that's quite a few more than I thought but those guys showed more upside their rookie year than Grant. Especially perimeter shooting.

I've got a bunch Grant never amounts to more than a backup if he even sticks on an nba roster

I agree that they made an assessment w enough of a record

And there is certainly a logic to the trade. Worst case we reboot W a ton of cap space

Just thought we'd get more in return

(5)(7)
fitzfarm
Posts: 25285
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

6/22/2016  8:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2016  8:32 PM
KNICKSBIGCATS wrote:My take?
Now that Rose is aboard, the next move is likely for Horford or Whiteside.

Interesting thought, don't you think with how horny coaches that KP will be the 5 with melo at the 4

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/22/2016  8:34 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2016  8:35 PM
franco12 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
franco12 wrote:
VCoug wrote:Fucking terrible trade. How do you give up a good center on a GREAT contract and a decent young PG on his rookie deal for Rose? A guy who hasn't made a single positive contribution on the court since 2011?!?! If we were that desperate for cap space next summer we couldn't have found some team to trade Lopez to where'd we get actual assets back? Or, why didn't we just not sign him last year? What the **** are we doing? Is there any semblance of a plan?

had to stop reading this thread with your post - I agree 100000000%

Trading Rolo = a complete 360 on what we've worked on for the last 2 years. What guarantee do we have that Phil is going to get it right now?

I'm not sure I understand your thought process. The point is to make moves when you have something of value. RoLo played very well and so we used him to get Rose on a one year deal. Not only did we improve the balance of the team but there's no real long term risk involved. This move for Rose could also lead to signing another top FA this summer and putting together a really good team. Remember we still have the ability to make a big play in FA. This is just the beginning of the process!!!

I'm willing to bet we could have traded Rolo to Boston for a number 1 pick and nothing more. And kept Grant and gotten similar production from him that we'll get from Rose - and I'm factoring in we may only get 40 games if we're lucky from Rose, and Grant could likely go 70+.

No way Boston wants Love or Melo not Lopez. Certainly not for their #1 pick!

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/22/2016  8:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2016  8:36 PM
pjax may be worse than isiah and layden combined ... WTF???

He takes our valuable/tradable asset and gets us freakin Rose (who has zero / negative value)?

spin doctors ... have at it

so here is what phil is thinking ....
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/22/2016  8:37 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:I just saw the news. Are people really defending this trade? Are people really defending Phil? Phil just continue to make dumb mistake after dumb mistake. This is the same old knick, no culture change at all. Phil gave up Lopez for a player who has a name and no game. They traded for a bum. This is said day yo.

1yr left on his deal! This isn't trading for Bargnani and throwing in your lottery pick to sweeten the deal!

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/22/2016  8:39 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/22/2016  8:40 PM
H1AND1 wrote:Horrible move. Rose is finished. Lopez was a legit building block on a reasonable deal. If anything we should've gotten a 1st rounder back for taking on Rose's contract. Horrendous. Same of shyte for the Knicks.

Lopez is a solid 25min player on a good team not a 30 in team

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

6/22/2016  8:39 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I just saw the news. Are people really defending this trade? Are people really defending Phil? Phil just continue to make dumb mistake after dumb mistake. This is the same old knick, no culture change at all. Phil gave up Lopez for a player who has a name and no game. They traded for a bum. This is said day yo.

1yr left on his deal! This isn't trading for Bargnani and throwing in your lottery pick to sweeten the deal!

so what ... expirings are worthless to us. why give away a valuable and tradable asset for crap? Steve Francis

so here is what phil is thinking ....
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

6/22/2016  8:40 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I just saw the news. Are people really defending this trade? Are people really defending Phil? Phil just continue to make dumb mistake after dumb mistake. This is the same old knick, no culture change at all. Phil gave up Lopez for a player who has a name and no game. They traded for a bum. This is said day yo.

1yr left on his deal! This isn't trading for Bargnani and throwing in your lottery pick to sweeten the deal!

Lopez is the lottery pick. Grant is a 1st rd pick. This is like if a team gave us assets for Amare when he was in his last year.

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

6/22/2016  8:40 PM
mreinman wrote:pjax may be worse than isiah and layden combined ... WTF???

He takes our valuable/tradable asset and gets us freakin Rose (who has zero / negative value)?

spin doctors ... have at it

yeah when i first heard the news i figured we were getting a first back too
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

6/22/2016  8:42 PM
mreinman wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:I just saw the news. Are people really defending this trade? Are people really defending Phil? Phil just continue to make dumb mistake after dumb mistake. This is the same old knick, no culture change at all. Phil gave up Lopez for a player who has a name and no game. They traded for a bum. This is said day yo.

1yr left on his deal! This isn't trading for Bargnani and throwing in your lottery pick to sweeten the deal!

so what ... expirings are worthless to us. why give away a valuable and tradable asset for crap? Steve Francis



Stupid Phil.
BREAKING: Woj: Knicks/Bulls advanced talks for Rose

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy