[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

We need a PG
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 13 of 13 « First‹ Previous 11  12  13 
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/10/2013  11:36 PM
3G4G wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????

I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?


I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
AUTOADVERT
3G4G
Posts: 23485
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2012
Member: #4333
1/10/2013  11:49 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/10/2013  11:50 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????

I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?


I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin

I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/10/2013  11:49 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:What PG are you gonna get for Novak? Usually teams are reluctant to trade PGs. I doubt you'll get anyone better than Prig.

The Lakers basically gave away Sessions last season because of expectations. I don't know who that player is this year, but the Knicks should find him. Kidd is not a point guard anymore(plus an overrated defender) and Priggy is a 3rd stringer.

"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/10/2013  11:51 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????

I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?


I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin

Have you compared Kidd to Lin recently?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/10/2013  11:53 PM
I think Kidd is fine as a PG but only if you have an SG who can penetrate and is a good passer.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/10/2013  11:55 PM
3G4G wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????

I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?


I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin

I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year


Lin's in his first 100 games as a PG and is inconsistent. His best games have been better than any of our point guards but when he's at his worst, he is worse than Kidd or Prigs ever are.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/10/2013  11:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/10/2013  11:56 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:I think Kidd is fine as a PG but only if you have an SG who can penetrate and is a good passer.

thats awkward. You have it backwards. Kidd is fine at SG as long as he has a PG who can handle, penetrate and kick. Or off the bench in a limited role which he will be once Shump and Felton return
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/10/2013  11:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/10/2013  11:58 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????

I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?


I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin

I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year


Lin's in his first 100 games as a PG and is inconsistent. His best games have been better than any of our point guards but when he's at his worst, he is worse than Kidd or Prigs ever are.

Maybe if you are only looking at numbers. There is no stat to illustrate the effectiveness of pushing the ball down the court and penetrating and creating. Both Lin and Felton do this very well.

Kidd and Prigs dont and you are seeing the effects on the Knicks offense
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/10/2013  11:58 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????

I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?


I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin

Have you compared Kidd to Lin recently?


Season as a whole, Kidd has been better. Last 10 games, I'd give the edge to Lin.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/11/2013  12:00 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/11/2013  12:02 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
3G4G wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????

I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?


I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin

I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year


Lin's in his first 100 games as a PG and is inconsistent. His best games have been better than any of our point guards but when he's at his worst, he is worse than Kidd or Prigs ever are.

Maybe if you are only looking at numbers. There is no stat to illustrate the effectiveness of pushing the ball down the court and penetrating and creating. Both Lin and Felton do this very well.

Kidd and Prigs dont and you are seeing the effects on the Knicks offense


It's fine to give a little weight to pushing the ball up and penetrating. To say that that compensates for being the least efficient scorer in the league at your position (and not even close to the next worst PG) is far-fetched though. The Knicks are an old team that's struggling. They had lost 3 of their last 5 before Felton went down.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/11/2013  12:01 AM
if they did other things they would be making big money. Not many complete PGs out there
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/11/2013  12:03 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I think Kidd is fine as a PG but only if you have an SG who can penetrate and is a good passer.

thats awkward. You have it backwards. Kidd is fine at SG as long as he has a PG who can handle, penetrate and kick. Or off the bench in a limited role which he will be once Shump and Felton return


That would work too. You don't think Kidd would be fine at PG if James Harden was his back-court teammate?
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
1/11/2013  11:27 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/11/2013  11:31 AM
gunsnewing wrote:So we have a 3 headed monster at PG and JR Smith runs the offense???

3 Headed? You still see Kidd as a PG?


Felton is out, Pablo is a 3rd string PG, we are playing without a starting PG and a backup PG

You keep brining up Bellinili
But Bellinili was not signed for the veteran's minimum, so we never had a shot, Bull's opted not to use their MLE like Lakers did for Jodie Meek's to save salary
He is strictly a shooter, no DEF, no handle, no versatility at all, there is a reason why CP3 opted not to recruit him to LA Clippers


Janeero Pargo makes the most sense to me, with the way how this team is constructed and how Woodson prefer's veteran's over talent

Some speed/quickness to initiate the offense, allow Kidd conserve his energy and be spot up shooter/snipe, as the 2dary ball handler and more importantly DEF the quicker guards

Garreat Temple if he gets waived by Wizards and Livingston by Cav's

and

make that phone call to Martin's agent
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/11/2013  12:25 PM
RonRon wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:So we have a 3 headed monster at PG and JR Smith runs the offense???

3 Headed? You still see Kidd as a PG?


Felton is out, Pablo is a 3rd string PG, we are playing without a starting PG and a backup PG

You keep brining up Bellinili
But Bellinili was not signed for the veteran's minimum, so we never had a shot, Bull's opted not to use their MLE like Lakers did for Jodie Meek's to save salary
He is strictly a shooter, no DEF, no handle, no versatility at all, there is a reason why CP3 opted not to recruit him to LA Clippers


Janeero Pargo makes the most sense to me, with the way how this team is constructed and how Woodson prefer's veteran's over talent

Some speed/quickness to initiate the offense, allow Kidd conserve his energy and be spot up shooter/snipe, as the 2dary ball handler and more importantly DEF the quicker guards

Garreat Temple if he gets waived by Wizards and Livingston by Cav's

and

make that phone call to Martin's agent

Thats true I didn't expect the Knicks to overpay for Camby and be able to offer Marco more money.

You missed my point. I'm not saying the Knicks have a 3 headed monster at pg. I'm saying many others were saying it and now evidently we only have 1 pg, a 40yr old sg and a 36yr old 3rd string
Page 13 of 13 « First‹ Previous 11  12  13 
« Reply To Topic
We need a PG
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy