Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Clean
Posts: 30311 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 8/22/2004 Member: #743 |
![]() martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:The problem with this game is we got an aggressive and engaged Randle, a fresh Kemba, a hot Fournier, no one from the twolves killed us, and it still wasn’t good enough. This whole team is streaky. They all go on runs where they look like stars and then follow it up with times where they look like trash. EF is now on the same hot streak RJ was on. RJ is back to looking avg at best. Some times Quick looks like a difference maker and other times he shoots 25% over 7 games. No one is consistent enough for us to rely on. This is why we still lose to bottom teams missing 2 of their best players. |
blkexec
Posts: 28297 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/3/2004 Member: #748 |
![]() martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:The problem with this game is we got an aggressive and engaged Randle, a fresh Kemba, a hot Fournier, no one from the twolves killed us, and it still wasn’t good enough. When thibs gives the most mins to inconsistent, non clutch, turn over prone players. What do you expect? Unless we have a superstar on the team, RJ and Randle should not be given superstar mins. RJ always potential but he’s not there yet. This team needs clutch and consistency on offense. Also we continue to see how small ball hurts this team on defense, as we saw Cat take it str8 to the rim for and 1 and checkmate. Where’s the knick fans that hated on Mitch and rather have Randle play center? I thought Taj played Cat great and Mitch was a disruptor in the paint with his length and rebounds. Just imagine Randle as our center all game. Layups and dunks will be plenty. And he will have more turnovers trying to take his man off the dribble. Can we at least end that discussion? Most superstars or all stars even can impact from multiple positions. This is why it’s difficult to build around Randle. He’s stuck at PF. Too slow to guard SF and not long enough or doesn’t have high defensive IQ to guard centers. I’m not saying Randle can’t carry a team, he definitely can, plus he’s our best player. But if you going to give top 5 minutes to someone, they have to have more flexibility to be able to guard and play multiple positions unless your a specialist in something. But Randle is not clutch enough to be the main guy when the game is on the line. And RJ is not consistent enough. We are flawed at the core. I don’t see how Randle and RJ makes each other better. But when they are separate, they definitely make players around them better. One of those guys should be traded for an impact player. I just don’t know who. The problem is non of them will be traded and we will continue to try and build around them 2. Two lefties that want to get to the rim while soaking up major mins. Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland.
The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
|
martin
Posts: 76050 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Really stuff here on how RJ and IQ need to learn a lot more in handling PnR. THREAD
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
martin
Posts: 76050 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|