[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Ricky Ledo
Author Thread
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/8/2015  5:21 PM
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..


Kinda hard to use Danny Green as an example. He was a 4 year college player and was drafted. He has d-=league time, no even a full season's worth...nowhere near it.

Further making my point...

AUTOADVERT
foosballnick
Posts: 21546
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2010
Member: #3148

4/8/2015  5:39 PM
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
4/8/2015  5:39 PM
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..


Kinda hard to use Danny Green as an example. He was a 4 year college player and was drafted. He has d-=league time, no even a full season's worth...nowhere near it.

Further making my point...


Definitely. Just wanted to point out we have a long ways to go before proclaiming we're doing it the Spurs way. Perhaps that process can start this offseason preceded with the draft. Only time will tell of course.
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
4/8/2015  5:45 PM
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.


The irony of that 54 win team is that the old pieces could have been easily replaced and required no cap space at all to acquire. The downfall wasnt the old heads, but rather the "core". Which brings the team where it is now...no core. I agree this isnt a one year process, this will take along time, more time than Phil likely has.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/8/2015  7:17 PM
It's impossible to talk about things in a logical way when people insist on putting words in other peoples mouths!
No one is talking about building with D League players. I've made enough threads making it clear how I see this team being built so all this BS you guys are posting is garbage.

When we say that we're going to take a Spurs approach it's clear that we're jus beginning the process. 1st we get thru the Draft and then FREE AGENCY! To establish a farm system of sorts takes some time but the process has already started. Those very same players you're dissing are just the beginning of a prospect development program.
It's going to be a comprehensive approach.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/8/2015  7:35 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/8/2015  7:50 PM
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

I actually think Phil is going the route of the 37 win team model..I think he will sign FAs that fits his system and have young players at the end of the bench...My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench..My point about the 54 win team is that the supporting role were mostly vet players..

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/8/2015  8:12 PM
holfresh wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

I actually think Phil is going the route of the 37 win team model..I think he will sign FAs that fits his system and have young players at the end of the bench...My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench..My point about the 54 win team is that the supporting role were mostly vet players..


Still missing the damned point. It's not just about next year. SUSTAINABILITY. This isn't about one years roster, but establishing a franchise that can win year after year. This team rebuild is a process and we can't get it all done in one off season. It's not about just what this team will be next season. That's the entire point of establishing a farm system of young players that you're developing for the long term. That's what we're talking about when we say we want to emulate the Spurs. They have a present day component and a future component to the franchise.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/8/2015  8:37 PM
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

I actually think Phil is going the route of the 37 win team model..I think he will sign FAs that fits his system and have young players at the end of the bench...My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench..My point about the 54 win team is that the supporting role were mostly vet players..


Still missing the damned point. It's not just about next year. SUSTAINABILITY. This isn't about one years roster, but establishing a franchise that can win year after year. This team rebuild is a process and we can't get it all done in one off season. It's not about just what this team will be next season. That's the entire point of establishing a farm system of young players that you're developing for the long term. That's what we're talking about when we say we want to emulate the Spurs. They have a present day component and a future component to the franchise.

U didn't even read anything I wrote..Phil is 70, he has two years at most to show something..Dolan and his stock holders won't stand for 14k viewers for an MSG Knick broadcast much longer..

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/8/2015  8:52 PM
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

I actually think Phil is going the route of the 37 win team model..I think he will sign FAs that fits his system and have young players at the end of the bench...My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench..My point about the 54 win team is that the supporting role were mostly vet players..


Still missing the damned point. It's not just about next year. SUSTAINABILITY. This isn't about one years roster, but establishing a franchise that can win year after year. This team rebuild is a process and we can't get it all done in one off season. It's not about just what this team will be next season. That's the entire point of establishing a farm system of young players that you're developing for the long term. That's what we're talking about when we say we want to emulate the Spurs. They have a present day component and a future component to the franchise.

U didn't even read anything I wrote..Phil is 70, he has two years at most to show something..Dolan and his stock holders won't stand for 14k viewers for an MSG Knick broadcast much longer..


I did read what you wrote and that's why i'm saying you miss the point. It's not about how old Phil is or how long he'll be here. His job is to build a foundation for this franchise that will set this franchise up for success for years after he's gone. Yes he wants to win next year, but there's more to this than that. You're view is short sighted and lacking any sense of understanding what is actually going on here.

This isn't about next year alone. The moves Phil is making aren't just to look good next year. Phil wants to leave this franchise in the best shape possible to be successful going forward. That's going to include some vets for now and a lot of young prospects in the D League and with the big team that are being properly developed. They want the D League team to be a better feeder system for the Big team. It will take a lot in order to establish a farm system and that process is already starting. That's why we have so many young prospects and there will be more added so that the D League team has better talent too. It's going to be a comprehensive approach to the entire franchise.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/8/2015  8:57 PM
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

I actually think Phil is going the route of the 37 win team model..I think he will sign FAs that fits his system and have young players at the end of the bench...My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench..My point about the 54 win team is that the supporting role were mostly vet players..


Still missing the damned point. It's not just about next year. SUSTAINABILITY. This isn't about one years roster, but establishing a franchise that can win year after year. This team rebuild is a process and we can't get it all done in one off season. It's not about just what this team will be next season. That's the entire point of establishing a farm system of young players that you're developing for the long term. That's what we're talking about when we say we want to emulate the Spurs. They have a present day component and a future component to the franchise.

U didn't even read anything I wrote..Phil is 70, he has two years at most to show something..Dolan and his stock holders won't stand for 14k viewers for an MSG Knick broadcast much longer..


I did read what you wrote and that's why i'm saying you miss the point. It's not about how old Phil is or how long he'll be here. His job is to build a foundation for this franchise that will set this franchise up for success for years after he's gone. Yes he wants to win next year, but there's more to this than that. You're view is short sighted and lacking any sense of understanding what is actually going on here.

This isn't about next year alone. The moves Phil is making aren't just to look good next year. Phil wants to leave this franchise in the best shape possible to be successful going forward. That's going to include some vets for now and a lot of young prospects in the D League and with the big team that are being properly developed. They want the D League team to be a better feeder system for the Big team. It will take a lot in order to establish a farm system and that process is already starting. That's why we have so many young prospects and there will be more added so that the D League team has better talent too. It's going to be a comprehensive approach to the entire franchise.


U still didn't read what I wrote..I never said anything about next year yet you wrote 3 paragraphs on the premise of me saying it's about next year..
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/8/2015  10:03 PM
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

I actually think Phil is going the route of the 37 win team model..I think he will sign FAs that fits his system and have young players at the end of the bench...My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench..My point about the 54 win team is that the supporting role were mostly vet players..


Still missing the damned point. It's not just about next year. SUSTAINABILITY. This isn't about one years roster, but establishing a franchise that can win year after year. This team rebuild is a process and we can't get it all done in one off season. It's not about just what this team will be next season. That's the entire point of establishing a farm system of young players that you're developing for the long term. That's what we're talking about when we say we want to emulate the Spurs. They have a present day component and a future component to the franchise.

U didn't even read anything I wrote..Phil is 70, he has two years at most to show something..Dolan and his stock holders won't stand for 14k viewers for an MSG Knick broadcast much longer..


I did read what you wrote and that's why i'm saying you miss the point. It's not about how old Phil is or how long he'll be here. His job is to build a foundation for this franchise that will set this franchise up for success for years after he's gone. Yes he wants to win next year, but there's more to this than that. You're view is short sighted and lacking any sense of understanding what is actually going on here.

This isn't about next year alone. The moves Phil is making aren't just to look good next year. Phil wants to leave this franchise in the best shape possible to be successful going forward. That's going to include some vets for now and a lot of young prospects in the D League and with the big team that are being properly developed. They want the D League team to be a better feeder system for the Big team. It will take a lot in order to establish a farm system and that process is already starting. That's why we have so many young prospects and there will be more added so that the D League team has better talent too. It's going to be a comprehensive approach to the entire franchise.


U still didn't read what I wrote..I never said anything about next year yet you wrote 3 paragraphs on the premise of me saying it's about next year..

You are quite clearly inferring that it's about next year. You just wrote that "Phil is 70" and "has two years at most to show something"! By saying that you think he has to show something next year or at the least the following year. Those are your words. You're the one suggesting a short time frame. You brought up Dolan and the Knicks Stock Holders not standing for 14K viewers much longer. All of which suggests that you think it's all about next year or at the most the following year.

You're previous posts are anti D League for some reason. You quite clearly aren't getting the point of what Phil is trying to do. He's not trying to build a team off of D Leaguers. He's trying to stock the cupboards with prospects and he will have to start with the D League and build that up in addition to using the Draft and Free Agency to look for as much talent as he can find. We have a lack of talent from the D League up to the NBA team.

holfresh wrote:My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

There's a certain limit to how much can be done with the cap we will have. By necessity Phil has to find alternative ways of building this roster. We can't fill it with quality Free agents from top to bottom. It's only logical that Phil is going to look at lower cost options if he can find some D League level players who can contribute. It's all part of the process. Still it's not about building with Fringe players. It's about identifying hidden gems and developing them into solid contributors. That is a more accurate description of what he's trying to do.

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

4/8/2015  10:15 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/8/2015  10:18 PM
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
foosballnick wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
nixluva wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:
Vmart wrote:
holfresh wrote:You guys are creaming over the idea of adding multiple dudes that was part of a 10-36 "D League" team..I don't get it..

D-league isn't about wins and losses but more about player development.

Well if you are bring up 3 guys that is on a 10-36 team, why would the results be any different in the NBA where winning matters..

They have a lot of shuffling with players. For instance Galloway gets called up he is their best player. Once he gets called up the team is left with a spot open. Same thing in baseball winning is important in the minors but players shuffle up and Down from minors and majors. Winning is secondary to player development.

At some point it has to be about winning..Young players don't win..I'm not willing to watch D Leageurs develop over the next five years to see who pans out..Philly and Minny have immensely more talented young players and are losing..Its not fun to watch..

Really??? This is the way you look at a team finally embracing player development? The very thing that winning franchises have used to help support their winning ways. I really don't understand the take you have here. We have a bunch of Rookies and 2nd year guys who we need to develop and it's not really about the W/L column when it comes to them. We're going to be addressing the top tier talent on this team this summer. But that doesn't mean it's not important to establish a developmental regime for the franchise. That's what this is all about. We'll be looking for players to upgrade the D League team as well as the Big team. We need a LOT of players in order to do that. Think about how many good players it will take to have a winning D League and Pro Team. You need to get with the program cuz I don't think you understand what's going on here.

Who are these teams that are now winning because of D Leaguers?..The difference between our 54 win team and the 37 win team was a vet bench...Seems like eons ago..

You miss the point entirely. It's about building sustainability. You can have your vet team that allows you to win games, but you should also be bringing along players in your system that you can plug in when needed. It's a cost effective way of forging sustainability. That's what the Spurs do and what the Knicks are now looking to establish as well. We don't want one good year followed by losing.

No, you are missing some the point..You are trying to build with fringe NBA players, hoping to catch lightening in a bottle..You were talking about bringing back 9 guys from this current team in other threads..When you are talking 5/6 of these guys at the end of the bench..We will be losing plenty...

The Spurs added one guy that played in the D League, Danny Green..And I don't know if he came directly from the D League..Hardly a reason to view it as the holy grail..

Are you suggesting that the Knicks are only going to build only with d league talent? it seems much more apparent that they are using the d-league guys to supplement their high first round pick as well as any free agents they bring in over the next several seasons.the 54 win team was not a sustainable model for building a franchise. There was no cap space and too much reliance on old and inconsistent players. A rebuild is not a one-year process.

I actually think Phil is going the route of the 37 win team model..I think he will sign FAs that fits his system and have young players at the end of the bench...My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench..My point about the 54 win team is that the supporting role were mostly vet players..


Still missing the damned point. It's not just about next year. SUSTAINABILITY. This isn't about one years roster, but establishing a franchise that can win year after year. This team rebuild is a process and we can't get it all done in one off season. It's not about just what this team will be next season. That's the entire point of establishing a farm system of young players that you're developing for the long term. That's what we're talking about when we say we want to emulate the Spurs. They have a present day component and a future component to the franchise.

U didn't even read anything I wrote..Phil is 70, he has two years at most to show something..Dolan and his stock holders won't stand for 14k viewers for an MSG Knick broadcast much longer..


I did read what you wrote and that's why i'm saying you miss the point. It's not about how old Phil is or how long he'll be here. His job is to build a foundation for this franchise that will set this franchise up for success for years after he's gone. Yes he wants to win next year, but there's more to this than that. You're view is short sighted and lacking any sense of understanding what is actually going on here.

This isn't about next year alone. The moves Phil is making aren't just to look good next year. Phil wants to leave this franchise in the best shape possible to be successful going forward. That's going to include some vets for now and a lot of young prospects in the D League and with the big team that are being properly developed. They want the D League team to be a better feeder system for the Big team. It will take a lot in order to establish a farm system and that process is already starting. That's why we have so many young prospects and there will be more added so that the D League team has better talent too. It's going to be a comprehensive approach to the entire franchise.


U still didn't read what I wrote..I never said anything about next year yet you wrote 3 paragraphs on the premise of me saying it's about next year..

[b]You are quite clearly inferring that it's about next year.[/b] You just wrote that "Phil is 70" and "has two years at most to show something"! By saying that you think he has to show something next year or at the least the following year. Those are your words. You're the one suggesting a short time frame. You brought up Dolan and the Knicks Stock Holders not standing for 14K viewers much longer. All of which suggests that you think it's all about next year or at the most the following year.

You're previous posts are anti D League for some reason. You quite clearly aren't getting the point of what Phil is trying to do. He's not trying to build a team off of D Leaguers. He's trying to stock the cupboards with prospects and he will have to start with the D League and build that up in addition to using the Draft and Free Agency to look for as much talent as he can find. We have a lack of talent from the D League up to the NBA team.

holfresh wrote:My issue is that it seems like we are banking on fringe/DLeaguers to be these bench players...He says he wants to have continuity...Having 5/6 Dleaguers/fringe NBA players that we are hoping to develop isn't a good thing in my opinion...

There's a certain limit to how much can be done with the cap we will have. By necessity Phil has to find alternative ways of building this roster. We can't fill it with quality Free agents from top to bottom. It's only logical that Phil is going to look at lower cost options if he can find some D League level players who can contribute. It's all part of the process. Still it's not about building with Fringe players. It's about identifying hidden gems and developing them into solid contributors. That is a more accurate description of what he's trying to do.

Why do I even write these words if you are going to tell me what I'm actually inferring...

If over the course of the next two years he is able to put together a good starting 5..I hope he will look to vet players with maybe one or two young players to make up his bench.


While I may have typed the next two years, I actually meant next year...Got it..
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/8/2015  10:25 PM
Technically any of our rookies that come back next year will be VETS. 2 Years from now they'll be even more experienced. There's nothing wrong with having some young players in your development program between the D League and the Pro team. Some of the guys that people are bringing up as Free Agent targets are not long time vets but young vets. Guys like Kris Middleton, Cory Joseph, Brandon Knight, Enis Kanter or Muscala. Phil is trying to build up the quality of young prospects in our system from the D League up thru the Pro team and that's going to take a lot of young players. This is the only way to start to establish a pipeline of good young players who can be brought up already familiar with our system and immersed in our culture. It's a long term approach.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/8/2015  10:47 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/8/2015  10:51 PM
nixluva wrote:Technically any of our rookies that come back next year will be VETS. 2 Years from now they'll be even more experienced. There's nothing wrong with having some young players in your development program between the D League and the Pro team. Some of the guys that people are bringing up as Free Agent targets are not long time vets but young vets. Guys like Kris Middleton, Cory Joseph, Brandon Knight, Enis Kanter or Muscala. Phil is trying to build up the quality of young prospects in our system from the D League up thru the Pro team and that's going to take a lot of young players. This is the only way to start to establish a pipeline of good young players who can be brought up already familiar with our system and immersed in our culture. It's a long term approach.

Nix, why do you think that the knicks take so many long mid range shots (and lead the league)? Do you think that this will change with better players or is it part of the system and the system allows players to take these shots?

Houston would cut a player if they take these shots unless there is a really good excuse.

SA does not take these shots either (even though Parker and Duncan or holdover mid range players who can hit them).

Cleveland and Atlanta stay away from these as well.

Jason smith and bargs camp here and its okay for them to just keep chucking mid range shots ... I don't get it. So old school.

Edit: I just checked and Jason Smith shoots 45% of his shots between 16 and 23 feet!!!! WTF?? And Phil went out to get this guy?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

4/8/2015  10:59 PM
I think those midrange numbers will go down IF we add more and better/smarter talent around our team. Excluding Jason Smith who is has lived at the midrange his whole career, it mostly comes down to the fact that our guards aint that talented or smart enough to penetrate/kickout or go to the rim. The only guard we have that can consistently do these things is Shved. Galloway and Larkin are too scared, or don't show the moves to get to the basket. A big part of this is coaching. When they are running the triangle and the guard gets the handoff from the bigman, if I were fisher I would say always attack the basket instead of taking the spot up jumper.
The Future is Bright!
blkexec
Posts: 28443
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
4/8/2015  10:59 PM
Your talent will dictate the shot chart.....Mudiay for example is a slasher and playmaker....hes going to the rim.....ok4 is going to the rim. If you dont have slashing abilities and your strength is jump shooting....then thats all you will do in this system. But you need that in your roll players to open the court for your stars. Thats why phil picked these guys.....
Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/8/2015  11:06 PM
blkexec wrote:Your talent will dictate the shot chart.....Mudiay for example is a slasher and playmaker....hes going to the rim.....ok4 is going to the rim. If you dont have slashing abilities and your strength is jump shooting....then thats all you will do in this system. But you need that in your roll players to open the court for your stars. Thats why phil picked these guys.....

why are players aloud to constantly set up in these areas?

Jason smith has shot these shots his whole career, why get this guy?

I have seen too many times that our guards drive and kick it out to smith for a 20 footer, and it was designed.

Philly stinks and have a lot to prove but they will not take these stupid shots. Why?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/8/2015  11:16 PM
mreinman wrote:
nixluva wrote:Technically any of our rookies that come back next year will be VETS. 2 Years from now they'll be even more experienced. There's nothing wrong with having some young players in your development program between the D League and the Pro team. Some of the guys that people are bringing up as Free Agent targets are not long time vets but young vets. Guys like Kris Middleton, Cory Joseph, Brandon Knight, Enis Kanter or Muscala. Phil is trying to build up the quality of young prospects in our system from the D League up thru the Pro team and that's going to take a lot of young players. This is the only way to start to establish a pipeline of good young players who can be brought up already familiar with our system and immersed in our culture. It's a long term approach.

Nix, why do you think that the knicks take so many long mid range shots (and lead the league)? Do you think that this will change with better players or is it part of the system and the system allows players to take these shots?

Houston would cut a player if they take these shots unless there is a really good excuse.

SA does not take these shots either (even though Parker and Duncan or holdover mid range players who can hit them).

Cleveland and Atlanta stay away from these as well.

Jason smith and bargs camp here and its okay for them to just keep chucking mid range shots ... I don't get it. So old school.

You're basing too much on what the team looks like with these particular players. It will look different with different players. If they bring in a Danny Green i'm pretty sure he'll be looking to take 3's rather than step in and take 2's. Schved, THJ and Ledo have no problem with taking 3's, but they have to be efficient. Minus Melo at SF we don't have a lot of 3pt shooting except for Early who was hurt a lot as well. We don't have a reliable stretch 4 either. These things more than anything are the reason for the lack of 3pt shots.

One of the big issues is getting penetration either via a real low post player or from a guard or SF. We don't get enough plays at the basket because many of the guys we have aren't capable. Now when we had Schved you saw more penetration and 3's. It's not really just the offense because you can get whatever shots you want in this offense. You have to have the talent tho. IMO some of the best offense is being able to draw fouls. The more our players can draw fouls the better.

This offense is very flexible but it really starts with better defense which would allow more fast break opportunities. The very 1st part of the offense is to push the ball and look for early offense. I expect the team to get out and run more next year than they have this year. The Triangle itself is so that you have some actions to get into when the defense is set. You're not supposed to slow it down for no reason.

Phil:

Finally, I want the offense to flow from rebound to fast break, to quick offense, to a system of offense.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

4/8/2015  11:44 PM
nixluva wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nixluva wrote:Technically any of our rookies that come back next year will be VETS. 2 Years from now they'll be even more experienced. There's nothing wrong with having some young players in your development program between the D League and the Pro team. Some of the guys that people are bringing up as Free Agent targets are not long time vets but young vets. Guys like Kris Middleton, Cory Joseph, Brandon Knight, Enis Kanter or Muscala. Phil is trying to build up the quality of young prospects in our system from the D League up thru the Pro team and that's going to take a lot of young players. This is the only way to start to establish a pipeline of good young players who can be brought up already familiar with our system and immersed in our culture. It's a long term approach.

Nix, why do you think that the knicks take so many long mid range shots (and lead the league)? Do you think that this will change with better players or is it part of the system and the system allows players to take these shots?

Houston would cut a player if they take these shots unless there is a really good excuse.

SA does not take these shots either (even though Parker and Duncan or holdover mid range players who can hit them).

Cleveland and Atlanta stay away from these as well.

Jason smith and bargs camp here and its okay for them to just keep chucking mid range shots ... I don't get it. So old school.

You're basing too much on what the team looks like with these particular players. It will look different with different players. If they bring in a Danny Green i'm pretty sure he'll be looking to take 3's rather than step in and take 2's. Schved, THJ and Ledo have no problem with taking 3's, but they have to be efficient. Minus Melo at SF we don't have a lot of 3pt shooting except for Early who was hurt a lot as well. We don't have a reliable stretch 4 either. These things more than anything are the reason for the lack of 3pt shots.

One of the big issues is getting penetration either via a real low post player or from a guard or SF. We don't get enough plays at the basket because many of the guys we have aren't capable. Now when we had Schved you saw more penetration and 3's. It's not really just the offense because you can get whatever shots you want in this offense. You have to have the talent tho. IMO some of the best offense is being able to draw fouls. The more our players can draw fouls the better.

This offense is very flexible but it really starts with better defense which would allow more fast break opportunities. The very 1st part of the offense is to push the ball and look for early offense. I expect the team to get out and run more next year than they have this year. The Triangle itself is so that you have some actions to get into when the defense is set. You're not supposed to slow it down for no reason.

Phil:

Finally, I want the offense to flow from rebound to fast break, to quick offense, to a system of offense.

so why did he get Jason Smith? All he can do is take terrible long range shots.

Why has philly decided that even though they are bad, they will not take these terrible shots?

Why is Jason smith even set up there on every play?

We will see next year but there are no more excuses if we lead the league in this category again.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/9/2015  12:39 AM
mreinman wrote:
nixluva wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nixluva wrote:Technically any of our rookies that come back next year will be VETS. 2 Years from now they'll be even more experienced. There's nothing wrong with having some young players in your development program between the D League and the Pro team. Some of the guys that people are bringing up as Free Agent targets are not long time vets but young vets. Guys like Kris Middleton, Cory Joseph, Brandon Knight, Enis Kanter or Muscala. Phil is trying to build up the quality of young prospects in our system from the D League up thru the Pro team and that's going to take a lot of young players. This is the only way to start to establish a pipeline of good young players who can be brought up already familiar with our system and immersed in our culture. It's a long term approach.

Nix, why do you think that the knicks take so many long mid range shots (and lead the league)? Do you think that this will change with better players or is it part of the system and the system allows players to take these shots?

Houston would cut a player if they take these shots unless there is a really good excuse.

SA does not take these shots either (even though Parker and Duncan or holdover mid range players who can hit them).

Cleveland and Atlanta stay away from these as well.

Jason smith and bargs camp here and its okay for them to just keep chucking mid range shots ... I don't get it. So old school.

You're basing too much on what the team looks like with these particular players. It will look different with different players. If they bring in a Danny Green i'm pretty sure he'll be looking to take 3's rather than step in and take 2's. Schved, THJ and Ledo have no problem with taking 3's, but they have to be efficient. Minus Melo at SF we don't have a lot of 3pt shooting except for Early who was hurt a lot as well. We don't have a reliable stretch 4 either. These things more than anything are the reason for the lack of 3pt shots.

One of the big issues is getting penetration either via a real low post player or from a guard or SF. We don't get enough plays at the basket because many of the guys we have aren't capable. Now when we had Schved you saw more penetration and 3's. It's not really just the offense because you can get whatever shots you want in this offense. You have to have the talent tho. IMO some of the best offense is being able to draw fouls. The more our players can draw fouls the better.

This offense is very flexible but it really starts with better defense which would allow more fast break opportunities. The very 1st part of the offense is to push the ball and look for early offense. I expect the team to get out and run more next year than they have this year. The Triangle itself is so that you have some actions to get into when the defense is set. You're not supposed to slow it down for no reason.

Phil:

Finally, I want the offense to flow from rebound to fast break, to quick offense, to a system of offense.

so why did he get Jason Smith? All he can do is take terrible long range shots.

Why has philly decided that even though they are bad, they will not take these terrible shots?

Why is Jason smith even set up there on every play?

We will see next year but there are no more excuses if we lead the league in this category again.


You're basically answering your question when you ask why is Jason Smith taking those shots. He's not much different than Bargs in that he has been a very good career midrange shooter. If your offense is going to have some shots taken from that area then you better be good at it. The mistake tho is to assume that when we have better players that we will continue to get MOST of our shots in those areas.

The missing ingredient right now is the low post big who can help to space the floor, pass out of the post and score in close to the basket. Then you also need a PG and wings who can shoot from 3. The midrange shooting big is only a small part of the overall scheme in a properly built team but on our team we simply have a big hole were our low post big should be. Remember that this team is a torn down version of what it's supposed to be. Don't base anything off what you see this year.

Now you just have to imagine for example a lineup of Towns, Monroe, Melo, Danny Green & Schved. You've got threats on the perimeter behind the 3pt line and two low post threats, with Towns also able to step into the midrange spot to take a jumper or drive. Since both Towns and Monroe are good passing bigs that helps the shooters to get those spot up 3's or fake and drive on scrambling defenders. You also have the Pinch post 2 man game on the weak side opposite the strong side triangle.

The real difference of this style is that it allows you to play with 2 bigs and not be stagnant or crowded due to the spacing and constant movement of the wings.

Ricky Ledo

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy