mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:Aldridge not a bunch of 3s, hasn't gone to the line muchBecause he makes high percentage shots near and/or in the paint
FG% FTW
Should aldridge add a 3 to his game?
His 10reb/gm probably says NO!
10 rebounds a game means he does not need to improve his game?
No it means I don't want 10reb/gm
To turn into 7reb/gm, because my big is trying to be cute
Shooting 3s at 33-36%, because that's what will be the median result
Aldridge has taken more 3s this year and what does cutting out long range 2s for 3s have to do with defensive rebounding
Yes ... I just wanted to see if he realized that because I am sure that he did not.
Aldridge needs to add the 3 to his game and he is obviously starting.
Hhhhhmmmm really ??
I knew he took more 3s
of course you did
WHat gets me is that Aldrige offensively is a worse version of Melo yet that's okay. I am not even talking about F5 either but most people view him as a great offensive player even though he takes a lot of contested mid range jumpers.
yes. people are clueless and just like to say stuff and pound their chest.
Melo is a better offensive player than aldridge. there is no question about that.
I don't think anyone would disagree
The game has more to it than offense right?
Aldridge better rebounder and defender
Which probably makes up the offensive gap whatever it may be
Therefore since Melo makes Max so should Aldridge
But if you guys have beefs with his contested offensive play
Don't bring him into any discussion for free agent signing at boo-koo bucks
so flip it around ...
if aldridge deserves the max than melo deserves the max?
didn't you say that melo was worth about 14 million?
I think that aldridge deserves the max if he cuts out those stupid long 2's and turns them into 3's. His efficiency is awful.
As you say ... he is in the league for all these years and has made it to the second round only once ... and his playoff performances ...
I'm going off of current market standards
But in an ideal world there should only be a handful of players making max
It's something these dumb owners have yet to figure out
What qualifies a player as Max worthy
Trying to reverse timelines work fly with me
I'll say it again I'm one who doesn't think Gasol should get Max
But he will and justifiably so based on market
so if you were portlands GM, what would you pay him?
If L.A. pulled the same bullcrap that Melo pulled on us[I highly doubt it]
Then I'm looking into a S&T towards the team he's threatening to leave to
Because I still have Lillard and some very complementary pieces
Ummmmm but if he's truly committed to staying with no BS then yes I'm paying him Max
I'm gonna figure San Antonio and Dallas age out and we're 1 piece
Away from winning it all with a exploding Cap on the horizon
See the difference Portland is in contention, has the pieces around L.A.
And are a near lock to win 50gms a season in the West
They are as close as they can be to winning
And that's all any franchise can ask for, is for a shot
We're not anywhere close to that and we already have a maxed out dude