mreinman wrote:tkf wrote:
you are notorious for creating these arguments I never claimed to have made and then arguing against it..
30 points a game does not make an argument against inefficiency. To me, this is a big of "flip flopping".
This is not that hard bro.. Iverson although an inefficient player was better than carmelo....
got it? where did I say iverson was efficient?Leading the league in steals was a detriment to his team and team defense
is that like saying carmelo leading the knicks in scoring was detrimental to the offense? OK if that is the road you want to go down... now next explain to me how was that so.. and please don't say iverson gambled on defense, is there really any proof of that? 3 time all NBA first team does not argue the numbers either.
what numbers are we arguing here? Iverson has better numbers, but a poster said carmelo was an all NBA player, he used that as a defense.. I countered with iverson being and all nba first team player 3 times... I don't get your point here..
"simple a better player than carmelo" maybe, but an empty statement
empty like, "top 5 player", "Best pure scorer", "best player on the knicks"?
nothing empty about it, Iverson was a better player....
I am notorious for creating these arguments? Ok ... You have not mentioned about how good/great a player that AI was? I never said that you said he was efficient, did I? You still see the issue here right?
You don't need to call me bro or get mad, just argue your points.
The steals being a detriment was from Clyde Frazier saying that he gambled too much and lost and that hurt his team defensively.
Leading the league in anything is great if its done efficiently. Jacking up 27 shots to lead the league in scoring at 31 per is horrible (Iverson). I would rather Melo not ever lead the league in scoring and shoot 47pct and average 5 assists.
I don't care how many times Iverson was All NBA, that does not change anything, people are obviously misinformed and bad GM's.
"simple a better player than carmelo" maybe, but an empty statement
empty like, "top 5 player", "Best pure scorer", "best player on the knicks"?
nothing empty about it, Iverson was a better player....
Again, a horribly empty argument/statement with lots of chest pumping. Neither of them were/top 5 players. Melo in my bood is 10-15 but he could be closer to top 5 if he made those adjustments.
Please read the Wages of Wins article about Iverson before responding. Funny but there is also an article in there that talks about how Iverson and Melo were a horrible pairing. And, when billups replaced him, they did much better.
Papabear Says
Iverson great player poor business man. He is now broke. I bet one thing when Melo retires he will retire as one the the most financially secured NBA players in history. Iverson had loads of talent but he could have been better. He traveled with his home boys and gave them money now he is broke. A sad story.