fishmike wrote:gunsnewing wrote:So fish you are saying it's better to be in a position where at least you have a player like Carmelo than be the Washington wizards. Years of high draft picks and complete roster mismanagement?My ideal scenario requires the Knicks front office to operate like the pacers, spurs celtics and lakers. I'd like to think that being in New York has soon level of cache to attrack players. It shouldn't be impossible. This regime makes it seen impossible but hopefully the day will come when Dolan let's basketball people run the team
better than the Wizards? Everyone looks better then the Knicks right now...but thats not saying much. Wiz have a couple potential blue chips... time will tell. The main thing would be to add a couple max guys before they have to pay Wall. Thats the real KEY. My thing with Melo is simply that while he has his faults he's also a rare breed of player. Very few guys can take over games like he can, and I dont mean hero ball stand and watch Melo, I mean be a pressense that the other team just cant deal with, but for that to happen for ANY player the supporting cast needs to be effective.
Remember how the Knicks used to beat the Heat? Let Zo get his, and stop the other guys. Rather than double Alonzo we let Ewing guard him and they kind of nuetralized each other. We would win because Houston, Spree, LJ, Camby.. those guys were simply better than Hardaway, thunder Dan, etc etc
What happens in the playoffs? Teams trap Melo and force the other guys to beat them. So what have we seen so far? Melo has had some big playoff moments, and some bad shooting nights as well, but game 1 of the Pacers series is a perfect example. 38 points, 8 rebs on 15-29 shooting and we lose by 8. Thats a Michael Jordan stat line, but we dont have Pippin, we have JR.
I would like to address a couple of things here.. First of all the Wizards already paid wall, so I really don't see why they need to add more max guys to a young team like theirs, the next step for them is to improve organically.. they have vets like ariza and nene, gortat there, and they have young players in wall, Beal and otto porter.
Remember how the Knicks used to beat the Heat? Let Zo get his, and stop the other guys. Rather than double Alonzo we let Ewing guard him and they kind of nuetralized each other. We would win because Houston, Spree, LJ, Camby.. those guys were simply better than Hardaway, thunder Dan, etc etc
I would not say that spree and Houston and camby were simply better than Hardway and marjele.. or even PJ brown... Those series were highly contested we beat them when we were an 8th seed thanks to that bounce we got on that Houston shot.. I think we beat the heat 3 series to 1, but make no mistake those were hard fought series that could have gone either way... Same struggles we had with indy, we were all evenly matched teams
What happens in the playoffs? Teams trap Melo and force the other guys to beat them. So what have we seen so far? Melo has had some big playoff moments, and some bad shooting nights as well, but game 1 of the Pacers series is a perfect example. 38 points, 8 rebs on 15-29 shooting and we lose by 8. Thats a Michael Jordan stat line, but we dont have Pippin, we have JR.
that is over simplifying things.. the bulls won on the defensive end first.. Pippen and Jordan were all world defenders, it started there first, so it didn't matter if jordan shot 15-29 or 15-39 the constant was defense, and sharing the ball on offense... lets not make pippen out to be some offensive juggernaut... the bulls had guys like steve kerr, paxon and Hodges hitting big shot game after game.. are you telling me, carmelo didn't play with guys as good as them? why not point out that carmelo dominates the ball and doesn't create offense for others.. you see Jordan did that, carmelo had a total of 8 assists the entire pacers series, that was less than roy hibbert.. Jordan on the other hand averaged 6 assits per game in the playoffs fish and shot an outstanding 49% from the field while carmelo shot 41% from the field in his playoff career.. you see fish this is more about great players like jordan being great, not about him having a pippen... and this is more about carmelo not being great than him not having a pippen... You have to be great to win on the highest level, not great for a game, not great doing one thing, your overall effect has to be great.. Jordan scored, passed and defended on an elite level.. and the players who can do great things for extended periods of time tend to win and elevate those around them...
but game 1 of the Pacers series is a perfect example. 38 points, 8 rebs on 15-29 shooting and we lose by 8.
NO FISH THAT IS NOT A PERFECT EXAMPLE.. it is not accurate.. game 1 carmelo had 27/11 boards on 10/28 shooting that is 36% shooting...
BTW the guy you love to pick on, felton had 18/2/3 on an efficient 8-12 shooting.. not great, but he played the best game of any knick.... if not the best, the most efficient..
so if anything carmelo let down his teammates not the other way around..
carmelo is not a bad player.. just not a great one.. not good enough to command a max contract and build around if you want a winner.. no matter how much comparing you do, to guys like Ewing, MJ, it doesn't fit...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF