mrKnickShot wrote:dk7th wrote:CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:GustavBahler wrote:DK7th what about is it about this team that you do like? Is there anything that you enjoy about watching this team or is Melo all you want to talk about? You spoke of "reaping what you sow". Truer words were never spoken. If you only post about the things you don't like about about this squad, the negatives, you shouldn't be surprised if you get nothing but negativity in return.
let me be clear: if other posters-- not you-- believe that i don't want the knicks to win then any fruitful dialogue is impossible. seems to me there are a lot of guys who believe i root for the knicks to fail. hence my critique is often spun. take a good close look at my signature if you want to see where my heart is.
i have spoken glowingly of jason kidd this season but oftentimes people want to stress the negative of what i write, forgetting that a critique will sometimes be critical.
i am a big fan of sheed and kidd. i love shumpert and can't wait to have him back. i admire chandler and hope he and camby get more time together. can't not like thomas. all these guys have various degrees of old school about them and i am a big fan of old school.
i am kind of indifferent to brewer and novak and copeland. prigioni is growing on me.
not a fan of felton, smith, or melo.
not a big fan of woodson either.
Dk I have to ask if you watch the Knicks much. I can't ever remember you participating in a game thread or referencing actual plays on the court. Call me out on this if i am wrong.
i use a desktop and don't own a laptop or smartphone. i am assuming you guys do own these things. the desktop does not face the same direction as the television either. it is laborious and distracting to participate in game threads although i gave it a shot one game this year.
as to referencing actual plays on the court of course i have. people just don't like my take on things so they are predisposed to teasing out the negative i guess. it's unfair but posters like to get worked up. ideally we would be sitting in the same room and watching the games so we could explain to each other the value of a particular play or player in the moment.
dk, you did participate in ONE game thread this season. Your goal was (and it was evident with each post) was to point out every heat check, non pass, low pct shot and lack of defense by a certain player. I believe that this certain player went on to have a very good / efficient game that the knicks won and I believe that this gave you a bad taste for game threads.
A certain unethical player is not playing tonight so it may be a good time for you to once again attempt the game thread.
i watch the games with the sole object of seeing if my team is looking like it can contend for a title. i am not looking at carmelo anthony with a rah-rah attitude. you better believe i am going to criticize mistakes that, looking forward to a playoff matchup in the second around and beyond, he will make his team pay for dearly. same with smith and same with felton, same with stat. they take the most shots and i don't like players who take more than their share of shots. not the right way to play and awful hard to win that way. you may not agree but that's not the point here. i want to see ball played in a way that is proven to win titles and if i don't see it then i am going to comment.
i am not a fan of his game but that does not mean i can's see past the end of my nose and am in fact predisposed to not liking what i see from him. give me more credit than that! same goes for felton and smith. but the essential question here must be: do their games translate to championship caliber play? so i see no reason to be gaga right now. i refuse to get too caught up in the moment during the regular season. "too caught up" means projecting titles or finals appearances.
do you see a champion or a finalist yet?
that said, since i don't know him personally i can only go by the way he carries himself on the court and the way he deals with matters financial and otherwise off the court. and from what i see there isn't a whole lot to admire about the guy. doesn't mean i can't separate the person from the player. if he plays the game the right way i get excited and my hopes get raised.
obviously i separate the two sides of garnett and pierce-- but you see i am a fan of their games. maybe if they were knicks i would care about their character.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%