[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Game Thread: New York Knicks @ Toronto Raptors - Wednesday, October 27, 2010 - 7:00 PM EST
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/27/2010  10:49 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
martin wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:We need more big man help

Mosgov is NO starter in the nBA and I hope that they realize this or he might regress from what he had going for him. He is good off the bench for 15 minutes or so.

I see the opposite. Moz is a quick learner and got better in the Worlds and Preseason each and every game. This is a kid that just needs minutes. There is not another free agent or C that you can trade for. This is the season to play him as much as you can.

He got jobbed on 1 foul and probably 2. no worries.

He was also going up against one of the more mobile big men in the league for his first start.

Not a put down on Mosgov--just that pro players will easily put 2 fouls on him every time he starts within 3 minutes once they see tape on him. I want to put Mosgov in position to help the team--which he can do--but that position is not starting 5 man--not yet--maybe in a year or two. If Mosgov can go against 2nd line players--I see him going 8-4-2 in 18 minutes. If he goes against the top guys--hell be on his arse on the bench too much.

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
10/27/2010  10:51 PM
I'm not sure why Chandler is getting praise. He had a nice game but I felt he forced the action on the offensive end too many times. He really killed any offensive flow every time he got the ball by going 1-on-1 each time or taking a jumper.

Yes, he hit them but he didn't play much of a team game tonight.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/27/2010  10:56 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:I'm not sure why Chandler is getting praise. He had a nice game but I felt he forced the action on the offensive end too many times. He really killed any offensive flow every time he got the ball by going 1-on-1 each time or taking a jumper.

Yes, he hit them but he didn't play much of a team game tonight.

I thought Chandler looked great. I think his role coming off the bench is to be very aggressive.
I also like the move by D'Antoni bringing him off the bench. I thought either he or Gallo needed to be on the second unit.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
10/27/2010  11:03 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:I'm not sure why Chandler is getting praise. He had a nice game but I felt he forced the action on the offensive end too many times. He really killed any offensive flow every time he got the ball by going 1-on-1 each time or taking a jumper.

Yes, he hit them but he didn't play much of a team game tonight.

I thought Chandler looked great. I think his role coming off the bench is to be very aggressive.
I also like the move by D'Antoni bringing him off the bench. I thought either he or Gallo needed to be on the second unit.

I guess everyone has their own definition of great.

I thought Chandler played selfish and was lucky to be hitting some of those shots.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
10/27/2010  11:21 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:I'm not sure why Chandler is getting praise. He had a nice game but I felt he forced the action on the offensive end too many times. He really killed any offensive flow every time he got the ball by going 1-on-1 each time or taking a jumper.

Yes, he hit them but he didn't play much of a team game tonight.

I thought Chandler looked great. I think his role coming off the bench is to be very aggressive.
I also like the move by D'Antoni bringing him off the bench. I thought either he or Gallo needed to be on the second unit.

I guess everyone has their own definition of great.

I thought Chandler played selfish and was lucky to be hitting some of those shots.

Chandler played solid defense. Had a good solid game.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/27/2010  11:56 PM
were not going to get away with a lack of size--we haev to address it quick. These teams out west are enormous---Amare is going to be tripled team every night unless we can a starting NBA caliber player at that 5 position.
RIP Crushalot😞
martin
Posts: 76295
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/28/2010  12:13 AM
BRIGGS wrote:were not going to get away with a lack of size--we haev to address it quick. These teams out west are enormous---Amare is going to be tripled team every night unless we can a starting NBA caliber player at that 5 position.

not sure why you keep harping this. Starting C's don't grow on trees. Knicks gonna have to develop and grow Moz and AR to shore up their front line.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
10/28/2010  12:17 AM
BRIGGS wrote:were not going to get away with a lack of size--we haev to address it quick. These teams out west are enormous---Amare is going to be tripled team every night unless we can a starting NBA caliber player at that 5 position.

was he tripled every night next to 6'7" PF shawn marion?

it's more important that gallo spreads the floor with his shooting, wilson keeps the mid-range game going and AR and Mozgov develop.

this team has a lot size. not traditional bangers, but mozgov, turiaf, amare, AR, gallo and wilson are six big and skilled guys.

¿ △ ?
Knixkik
Posts: 35463
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
10/28/2010  12:19 AM
I think we are fine when it comes to quality centers considering how difficult they are to find. Mozgov won't develop overnight but he will get there. He is the perfect compliment to Amare similar to how Lopez was that last season. Turiaf is fine off the bench for 16-20 minutes as well. Also, there will be plenty of opportunity for Randolph to play at center and he still has a chance to be a big time player alongside Amare. I don't think this is a major concern for us, our bigs we have now will figure it out, it will just take some time.
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

10/28/2010  12:25 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:I'm not sure why Chandler is getting praise. He had a nice game but I felt he forced the action on the offensive end too many times. He really killed any offensive flow every time he got the ball by going 1-on-1 each time or taking a jumper.

Yes, he hit them but he didn't play much of a team game tonight.

I thought Chandler looked great. I think his role coming off the bench is to be very aggressive.
I also like the move by D'Antoni bringing him off the bench. I thought either he or Gallo needed to be on the second unit.

I guess everyone has their own definition of great.

I thought Chandler played selfish and was lucky to be hitting some of those shots.

Just to play devil's advocate- you can probably say the same about Amare, even though he is our designated "go to" superstar import.

If Chandler goes 5/15 with 5 turnovers the next 2 games playing the same way he did vs Toronto, and does nothing to adjust his game, then I would say your comments are warranted. On the other hand, if Chandler can play like this 80% of the time and the team benefits, what do you say then?

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
10/28/2010  12:43 AM
Paladin55 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:I'm not sure why Chandler is getting praise. He had a nice game but I felt he forced the action on the offensive end too many times. He really killed any offensive flow every time he got the ball by going 1-on-1 each time or taking a jumper.

Yes, he hit them but he didn't play much of a team game tonight.

I thought Chandler looked great. I think his role coming off the bench is to be very aggressive.
I also like the move by D'Antoni bringing him off the bench. I thought either he or Gallo needed to be on the second unit.

I guess everyone has their own definition of great.

I thought Chandler played selfish and was lucky to be hitting some of those shots.

Just to play devil's advocate- you can probably say the same about Amare, even though he is our designated "go to" superstar import.

If Chandler goes 5/15 with 5 turnovers the next 2 games playing the same way he did vs Toronto, and does nothing to adjust his game, then I would say your comments are warranted. On the other hand, if Chandler can play like this 80% of the time and the team benefits, what do you say then?

it's time for Chandler to find some consistency in his effort. maybe coming off the bench allows him to do that.

i have no problem with Chandler playing a little selfish. his problem for years was that he was too unselfish.

¿ △ ?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/28/2010  12:55 AM
Paladin55 wrote:
Solace wrote:A win... nice! Not bad. Chandler was great. Fields also very impressive. Amare turned it on when it counted. Can't complain too much.

Can't live with 9 turnovers from Amare, though. On the reviewed play when the ball was knocked off his foot, Gallinari was waiting for pass about 4 ft from the basket and Amare tried to force things anyway with his head down.

Decent way to start the season, though, and a nice all around effort from everyone against a team we should beat.

And we actually out rebounded a team.

Yeah, 9 is bad. If only he had 10, he would've had a triple double, right?

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Nalod
Posts: 71204
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/28/2010  12:57 AM
Ugly win, but a win is always prettier than losing.

Rainman looked better at times.

I had to watch thru the Toronto feed which was brutal. Real Homers.

When it counted Gallo hit a big shot and grabbed some rebounds down the stretch. He had a nice post up move once or twice.

Regarding the Moz, he is what we thought he would be or feared as such. A foul machine. The moves are there, the attempts are there, and you can see the potential.

Briggy, I guess you have a point but MDA is giving the kid minutes and every opportunity.

Only thing that bugged me was Amares turn overs in the paint turning into double teams.

We win a road game. Thats good!

On too Boston. Moz vs. Shaq. I pray for the Moz.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/28/2010  1:10 AM
The reason Amar'e had all those turnovers is because he isn't being setup in the PnR like he should be. He's getting the ball to far out on the court with no real advantage and thus he has to create his own shot. Now he could pass the ball back, but that's not what he's used to doing. He's a finisher and our guards are giving up their dribble WAY to early and making stupid long distance passes to him where he has no shot and has to force it. Unless they fix that tendency we're gonna see a lot of TO's by Amar'e this year.

Also the PG's miss Moz in the paint WAY too often. He's too freakin big not to see him with his arms up in the paint.

Chandler wasn't forcing his offense, he's got to be a bit selfish out there. He's one of our primary scoring options. If we can get Gallo to be that way too, it would really help the team a lot.

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34060
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

10/28/2010  3:06 AM
JamaicanJetFan wrote:So this is what a star player stepping up in crunch time looks like

I needed a new sig

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
fishmike
Posts: 53848
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/28/2010  8:06 AM
this was a great for a few reasons. We NEVER won these kinds of games in recent years. We did not shoot well at all, but we played great defense (Tor shot 39%), we outrebounded them and we had 10 blocks in the game. We really attacked the rim (52 points in the paint) and played physical. It was a good grind it out win, and Chandler looked great as the primary bench scorer. Amare did what he's paid to do.

We missed a lot of 3s but I thought they were pretty good shots in the flow of the offense. Walker and Mason looked terrible. I like the Douglas/Felton backcourt. Seems like one of them is simply to fast for opposing SGs and that guy scores pretty easily.

Mosgov will be fine. I hope MDA doesnt do some panic crap and pull him for Turiaf after one game. Mosgov is really a key to our long term success here. Turiaf was great. Knicks really went after that ball on defense. 10 blocks is awesome.

Fields is like our Shane Battier. He's just a really good player. The kind of guy who looks great playing with talent

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
VDesai
Posts: 42766
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
10/28/2010  9:41 AM
Its good to have a closer. Amare is a closer- a guy who can take the ball at the end and actually score. We haven't had that in forever. Marbury could do it somewhat but also seemed to go 50% at the foul line at the end of games.

Ill Will was great. He looks so much more confident offensively right now - I think he's poised for a breakout season.

Landry Fields has proven to be what I thought he was- a guy who is just a flat out good player that people slept on for no real reason. He should've been a first round pick.

I think Felton did a real nice job at times last night, but I could do without him shooting 3's.

I really like Turiaf

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/28/2010  10:06 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/28/2010  10:32 AM
Amar'e showed why he's the man last night. Those 3 consecutive buckets late really stabilized everything for us during that stretch..Nix mentioned on another thread that he's not getting the ball in the right spots and I totally agree with that (Ray and TD must do a better job, Felton in particular. He seems to be able to do some incredible things at times when he puts his mind to it but then at other times he gets incredibly lax &/or has so much trouble executing the easiest of plays it seems -- last night late he didn't seem to have the same energy whereas earlier in the game he was going to the rim at will -- late when that game was close and going back and forth I was looking for Ray to take it to the rim for some buckets and it never came. Maybe he just ran outta gas?) but what I really like about Amar'e is that he's one of the few bigs in the league that can go get his own shot wherever he happens to be in the halfcourt. You can give this guy the ball 20-25 feet out and he'll put it on the floor and get to the rim for either the bucket or the foul. That's really rare in this league for a guy 6'10" or bigger -- you combine that skill with the improved jumper w/range and the ability to get out and run & finish and you got a supreme offensive package... He's gonna block shots and he's always gonna give solid effort. Good leadership skills as well. I'm very please with him. Only thing is he's just not a great rebounder given his size and supreme athletic ability even though last night he managed double figures which was good. I wonder if his hands are a little on the small size for a guy that big. Seems like he's right there for rebounds but has trouble gaining control and sometimes fumbles it away or has it taken away. Last night he was solid though -- I'll sign up for 10 rebs/night from him every night.

The refs need to cool it with the quick whistles on Moz. Gimmie a break with some of these calls -- he's barely even touching guys. The touch fouls are driving me crazy...Let him play his guy. Some of it's one him -- the dude's got some work to do obviously but at other times I feel like he's an advantage that the refs simply aren't letting us use. It's almost as if the refs are anticipating him committing quick fouls in the 1st period. Good refs shouldn't anticipate anything - instead let it unfold and just call it like you see it.

Turiaf deserves a ton of credit for last night's win. Dude played very well. He's really a plus shot-blocker. Box score said he got 4 last night and I tell ya he must have altered at least another 4. Even the ones he didn't get, he was all over any Raptor that took the ball to the basket or looked to score in close..Like Amar'e he doesn't seem to be a great rebounder given his size and athleticism but the effort's definitely there...Decent offensive player too when given a chance. He's got decent touch (people don't realize this but he actually can shoot a little w/o embarrassing himself) and he can also score it on the pick and roll and finish with authority. I think he's gotta touch it more on offense and be allowed to take the shot if it's there. Very decent backup big man that doesn't get enough credit by some on this board. Having said that, I still would've looked to add another rebounder at the end of the bench in the event that any combination of Amar'e, Moz, AR, Gallo, Turiaf aren't getting it done. It definitely looks to be a weakness with most of our bigs and I'd like Mike to have an alternative specialist-type to go to in a pich to correct the problem. Last night we did fine but it's obvious on some nights we're gonna struggle on the glass. I would hate for that to cost us some games.

Gallinari continues to disappoint -- he hit the defensive glass a little late in the game which was good but otherwise he was invisible. Dude just plays so goddamn soft for a guy that big. Same old problem with the shot-selection last night that we've been seeing -- camped out deep on the perimieter launching up 3 balls. Dude offers little else. My God -- will that ever change?????????????

Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

10/28/2010  10:38 AM
Gallinari continues to disappoint -- he hit the defensive glass a little late in the game which was good but otherwise he was invisible. Dude just plays so goddamn soft for a guy that big. Same old problem with the shot-selection last night that we've been seeing -- camped out deep on the perimieter launching up 3 balls. Dude offers little else. My God -- will that ever change?????????????

Papabear Says

Mayby thats what D"Antoni wants him to do.

Papabear
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/28/2010  10:55 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/28/2010  10:56 AM
Papabear wrote:
Gallinari continues to disappoint -- he hit the defensive glass a little late in the game which was good but otherwise he was invisible. Dude just plays so goddamn soft for a guy that big. Same old problem with the shot-selection last night that we've been seeing -- camped out deep on the perimieter launching up 3 balls. Dude offers little else. My God -- will that ever change?????????????

Papabear Says

Mayby thats what D"Antoni wants him to do.

I don't believe that at all -- D'Antoni talks often about Gallo taking the next step as a player. He's not gonna go out of his way to limit or restrict one of his players esp. a guy he and the rest of the organization are looking at to become an all-star level player for this club. This kid just doesn't seem to be comfortable doing anything else besides shooting perimieter shots. Funny thing is he talked extensively about working to improve "his explosiveness and his post up game" in Italy during the offseason. I don't think that's a lie -- I believe him. I just can't comprehend why he's shying away from implementing the things he worked on. If I spent hours upon hours working on specific things during my offseason I'd be chomping at the bit to show my improvement to everybody, esp. the doubters.

Game Thread: New York Knicks @ Toronto Raptors - Wednesday, October 27, 2010 - 7:00 PM EST

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy