Posted by knicks1248:
Bip I would then give him a little more credibility...but that would more so be a MDA pick rather then walsh hand picking him his self. At the same time if the Tyler hansborough or any of the 5 after Hill develope in better players he can easily be criticize as well. So as we all already know "There's a thin line btwn love and hate"
Exactly, so why are we criticizing him now. That's my whole point. Don't you have to give the guy time to have his moves develop before we criticize or praise. All the criticism he's getting is based on hypotheticals and not reality.
As for the 2nd part of your post, this to me has been 100% of the problem for the Knicks over the years. We forget that this is a team game and not one against the other. Who cares who made the selection and who didn't. To build this team we need a group of people that can make the right decisions. We don't need the coach pitted against the GM trying to gain credit for good picks or pass blame for bad picks. It doesn't matter if Walsh made the pick, D'Antoni or the lowest scout on the totem pole. In the end, it's a team selection and they all get credit or blame. If a rookie scout picks out the next Kobe Bryant and we draft him 25th and win 18 titles, then that rookie scout gets credit for a great scouting eye. The coaching/scouting team gets credit for listening. The GM gets credit for hiring/retaining a staff that includes the rookie scout that was smart enough to make the decision.
We have to get back to that 70's Knicks mentality. We are in this as an organization. The Spurs do this. The Jazz do this. The Lakers do this. No more blaming individuals and firing coaches after a year or firing GM's after a year. We are never going to get anywhere with that approach.