Posted by crzymdups:
oh, so i can decide zach was a +10 in the milwaukee game instead of the -10 he actually was? yes, it's more detailed which is cool, but it's still a plus/minus. i like it, but i don't think it's fundamentally different than a plus/minus stat. it's just far more detailed. which, again, cool. but a plus/minus will tell you the basic story.
i don't think either is complex enough to tell the whole story of the game, but whatever. theyre both useful.
Eh, you're over dramatizing it.
What I am saying is some sites will just say Zach was -10 for an entire game. This site lets you see each and every single aspect of a game. So you can see where he was, say, -90 for a spell... then, say, +50 for a spell.
And then you can see that maybe when he was -90 we only were down 5. Yet, when he was +50 we went up by 15.
So, in that, maybe he's -40, but in the end he was a part of the run that put us way ahead, so he wasn't REALLY as big a negative as these whacky formulas (ft+fg+stls-tos-fatness+loveappeal-baddressing+obamawinning-russiainvadinggeorgia+imdrunk-somerandomjerkrobbedabank = Zach -40) would lead you to believe.
You know, it lets YOU decide, not some clowns on some site that got it wrong.
82games.com has some of the best players in the game as absolute trash in their +/- and total scrubs in the top of their list. That's right? No, it's not, and sites like the one I showed you allows.....
YOU to make the call.
See what I mean?