[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

nate,lee and frye spill the beans about last year (article)
Author Thread
martin
Posts: 79164
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/7/2006  2:44 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by djsunyc:


marbury's 8 assists are empty. 33 wins in his best statistical season. so much for making others around you better.

big picture killa: isiah was hired 2 1/2 years ago. the team he inherited won 37 games the sesaon before with a payroll in the $80 mil range. 2 1/2 seasons later, 2 coaches fired, payroll in excess of $120 mil...37 wins ain't gonna cut it. all of these players are isiah's. all of the coaches were isiah's. look at what we're talking about - .500. that's what this team is reduced to. AWESOME.

Yeah, you have addressed nonoe of my points, except the shocker that Marrb's 8apg were empty.
Here is a question I can never get an answer to from any of LB's concubines:
If LB were here, what win total would cut it?

None of you can answer this, because a) you dont want your double standard to be exposed and 2) you think there is something more magical about LB's wins than Zekes. If we win 45 games with Zeke, you will call those empty wins and find some other nonsensical way to discredit him and our teams progress. No one had mandate for LB above .500, but in Zekes one year, he must make the playoffs and be above .500? All i ask for is what I can never get from you guys, consistancy. An equal standard.

Its no different than how Briggs didn't like Frye and said time and time again that Frye has to average 14 and 7 in order for drafting him to make any sense. I root for the Knicks, not LB, Steph or Isiah. Apparently, LB is the only coach who knows how to win.

Actually BRIGGS said he thought Frye was a very solid pick. No need to put words in other people's mouths.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AUTOADVERT
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
7/7/2006  2:46 PM
Posted by codeunknown:

Some here have done that. But, the LB detractors are no less. Not only did LB throw the season but he tricked his family into moving to New York and buying a house. Scoundrel.
FYI, many Brownies conceede that he threw the season. What is your point about 'tricking' his family into buing a house? He bought a house in a city where he signed a 5 year 60 million dollar contract. He had a house in Michigan too. What is your point?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/7/2006  2:47 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:

Its no different than how Briggs didn't like Frye and said time and time again that Frye has to average 14 and 7 in order for drafting him to make any sense. I root for the Knicks, not LB, Steph or Isiah. Apparently, LB is the only coach who knows how to win.

Just to nitpick about one point. I don't believe Briggs ever said he didn't like Frye. He just thought we drafted him too high, gave him a guarantee WAY early in the game and that there were better options available at #8. He's not the only one that thought that way. I felt that way. Frye had a good season, so I'm not as disappointed, about what we missed out on, but I still question if he was the right pick at #8 (it's looking like there's a decent chance it may have been). While the Frye supporters have called it a coup from day one, I think some others still question the Frye draft choice a little. That doesn't mean that people hate Frye. He had a good rookie season, but he has some areas he needs to improve before people will annoint him "the next Tim Duncan" (which I've heard someone say on this board before). That's all.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
martin
Posts: 79164
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/7/2006  2:47 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by djsunyc:


marbury's 8 assists are empty. 33 wins in his best statistical season. so much for making others around you better.

big picture killa: isiah was hired 2 1/2 years ago. the team he inherited won 37 games the sesaon before with a payroll in the $80 mil range. 2 1/2 seasons later, 2 coaches fired, payroll in excess of $120 mil...37 wins ain't gonna cut it. all of these players are isiah's. all of the coaches were isiah's. look at what we're talking about - .500. that's what this team is reduced to. AWESOME.

Yeah, you have addressed nonoe of my points, except the shocker that Marrb's 8apg were empty.
Here is a question I can never get an answer to from any of LB's concubines:
If LB were here, what win total would cut it?

None of you can answer this, because a) you dont want your double standard to be exposed and 2) you think there is something more magical about LB's wins than Zekes. If we win 45 games with Zeke, you will call those empty wins and find some other nonsensical way to discredit him and our teams progress. No one had mandate for LB above .500, but in Zekes one year, he must make the playoffs and be above .500? All i ask for is what I can never get from you guys, consistancy. An equal standard.

Its no different than how Briggs didn't like Frye and said time and time again that Frye has to average 14 and 7 in order for drafting him to make any sense. I root for the Knicks, not LB, Steph or Isiah. Apparently, LB is the only coach who knows how to win.

I would say that 50 wins and having the team moving in the right direction would have been a very good year 3 total for LB. I hold Isiah to the same. This is his third year.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
7/7/2006  2:48 PM
Posted by martin:

Actually BRIGGS said he thought Frye was a very solid pick. No need to put words in other people's mouths.
Martin I am at home sick, I have nothing but time, do you want me to pull up one of the MANY threads where he said this? He wanted us to get Bynum, and said Frye was soft, etc.

joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/7/2006  2:49 PM
Yeah, you have addressed nonoe of my points, except the shocker that Marrb's 8apg were empty.
Here is a question I can never get an answer to from any of LB's concubines:
If LB were here, what win total would cut it?

This year or last?

Last year-.500
This year-(based on last year)- 38-41

Records based on the fact that Larry actually thinks he will have a hard time with this roster.

The higher expectaions are on Isiah because he states how wonderful this roster is.

~You can't run from who you are.~
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
7/7/2006  2:49 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by djsunyc:


marbury's 8 assists are empty. 33 wins in his best statistical season. so much for making others around you better.

big picture killa: isiah was hired 2 1/2 years ago. the team he inherited won 37 games the sesaon before with a payroll in the $80 mil range. 2 1/2 seasons later, 2 coaches fired, payroll in excess of $120 mil...37 wins ain't gonna cut it. all of these players are isiah's. all of the coaches were isiah's. look at what we're talking about - .500. that's what this team is reduced to. AWESOME.

Yeah, you have addressed nonoe of my points, except the shocker that Marrb's 8apg were empty.
Here is a question I can never get an answer to from any of LB's concubines:
If LB were here, what win total would cut it?

None of you can answer this, because a) you dont want your double standard to be exposed and 2) you think there is something more magical about LB's wins than Zekes. If we win 45 games with Zeke, you will call those empty wins and find some other nonsensical way to discredit him and our teams progress. No one had mandate for LB above .500, but in Zekes one year, he must make the playoffs and be above .500? All i ask for is what I can never get from you guys, consistancy. An equal standard.

Its no different than how Briggs didn't like Frye and said time and time again that Frye has to average 14 and 7 in order for drafting him to make any sense. I root for the Knicks, not LB, Steph or Isiah. Apparently, LB is the only coach who knows how to win.

I would say that 50 wins and having the team moving in the right direction would have been a very good year 3 total for LB. I hold Isiah to the same. This is his third year.
ROFL!! Ok.

codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/7/2006  2:51 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by codeunknown:

Some here have done that. But, the LB detractors are no less. Not only did LB throw the season but he tricked his family into moving to New York and buying a house. Scoundrel.
FYI, many Brownies conceede that he threw the season. What is your point about 'tricking' his family into buing a house? He bought a house in a city where he signed a 5 year 60 million dollar contract. He had a house in Michigan too. What is your point?

I'm saying that LB is a genius. That house was a great investment. He duped Jimmy, his family and now Stern. Thats 40 million big ones worth of house.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
7/7/2006  2:52 PM
i would've expected an above 500 record for larry brown this season - but i would have expected Isiah to make moves to bring in defenders/shooters and some leadership guys that lb wanted. Everywhere else he had a big turnaround in his second year, so with more defensive minded players I think he would've been above 500 this year. If they made deals that he asked for (and im not talking about the francis/jalen rose bs, i'm talking about getting guys in the shane battier mold, the types of players the LB has won with in the past)

Isiah needs to be above 500 because this is HIS team and he has spent 120 million to get these players - he HAS to believe that this team can win games and he HAS to have an idea of what it takes to make this team do well. If he can't win games with this team then he is a terrible GM. If he's traded the #2 pick this past year and probably our first round pick next year, he HAS to believe that this team can win games now, otherwise he is a terrible GM. If he can get this team above 500, then he shouldn't have hired larry brown as a coach in the first place- he should have understood the "strengths" of his players and picked the right coach accordingly. I will give him a pass if he is above 500 with this team.

If brown was here and he got his players I would've expected at least an above 500 record with him as well.
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/7/2006  2:54 PM
Posted by martin:

I would say that 50 wins and having the team moving in the right direction would have been a very good year 3 total for LB. I hold Isiah to the same. This is his third year.

As much as I think Isiah has screwed up, I think this is a little unfair. I would say that if Isiah gets the team playing at or near .500 and playing hard EVERY night, that would be enough for me. I think 35 wins would be enough for Dolan to get Isiah another year.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/7/2006  2:54 PM
Posted by oohah:
marbury's 8 assists are empty. 33 wins in his best statistical season. so much for making others around you better.

big picture killa: isiah was hired 2 1/2 years ago. the team he inherited won 37 games the sesaon before with a payroll in the $80 mil range. 2 1/2 seasons later, 2 coaches fired, payroll in excess of $120 mil...37 wins ain't gonna cut it. all of these players are isiah's. all of the coaches were isiah's. look at what we're talking about - .500. that's what this team is reduced to. AWESOME.

DJ, I think you are missing the point. The team won 23 games last year, now you want them to be a better than .500 team, just because Isiah is coaching the players he restocked the team with and they have a high payroll? It doesn't make sense! You don't go from 0MPH to 100MPH without a period of acceleration no matter what the conditions are!

I have a question for you: What record would have made you happy if LB were still coaching? A direct answer please.

oohah

the hiccup that was lb was under isiah's regime. he can't blame lb b/c he brought in lb. lb's failures is isiah's failures. they are not independant. it was under his regime. so in his first full season, the team won 33 games. in the 2nd season, it won 23 games. the GM during this time? isiah thomas. so we're now onto year three. when he was hired, and you were told the payroll is around $130 mil and after making 40+ transactions, what would you expect this season?

if lb remained, i would expect a pretty big roster overhaul. with that said, i have no idea who would be here or who wouldn't. lb was signed on for 5 years, which meant it was 4-5 year plan. looking at lb as year 1 of the new plan, i would expect the knicks to be challenging for playoffs in year 2 and definitely playoffs/division in year 3 and higher aspirations in year 4.

but lb was fired and blamed. so in essence, he was just a part of year 2 in the isiah plan. so now we're in year 3 of the isiah plan. that's the difference.

and with the players blaming lb. with dolan blaming lb. and with isiah blaming lb and saying "he likes our players and is comfortable with them", let's see what $135 mil gets you.

so to me, no playoffs, no .500, no isiah.
nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
7/7/2006  2:54 PM
YOu should start to see these things happen or yes it is Isiah's fault. You won't see it all at once because Brown didn't teach that to any of them. (Sorry, telling the NY Post that they need to play D or that you preach D doesn't equate with teaching the players)
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by newyorknewyork:

It comes down to what Larry Browns agenda was. Was it to basically take the season off to teach pure fundamentals. Or was it to undermine Isiah and get what he wants.

Even if it was to teach. The only person who understood what he was doing was Larry Brown. So if the players feel that the coach is tanking the season in order to get rid of them anyway how do you think they are going to respond?? Do you think they are going to trust him in his coaching? When they are *thinking* he is purposly putting them in a position to fail so he could get rid of them. Yes he has a track record of turning teams into winners. But do you think players don't know of his track record of trading players away. If it was clear to everyone that the season was stricly about learning fundamentals, and expirementing, and putting players in situations so they could learn from it. Then there would have been way less drama. But it wasn't clear.

Even if it was to teach. Larry Brown did a poor job of making everyone understand that. Which should have been an understanding at the door when Isiah was hiring Brown. That Brown was going to use last season to teach while record shouldn't matter. Which should have then been relayed to the players. So that none of this would come as a suprise to the players.


Okay that's fine. So that of course means that all our players are going to come into camp in shape and play ahrd all year long. The negative influence is gone. The guy that wanted them gone all along is now gone. Fired!! Now they have a coach that wanted them at all costs. So now that we got rid of Larry that means all our players are ready to go. No season is perfect, especially after last year, but I'm assuming that we will have few blips in terms of effort and commitement to the team concept and respect for the coach.

We have all reached the conclusion that our reason for the 23 wins and utter failure was LB. Now he's gone. We may not be good this year. But in terms of effort and lack of complaints we will be a model franchise. Am I wrong here?
Bip.. this is great. Exactly what I have been trying to say.

earl, Holfresh, Ki, ooha, RV, everyone and anyone else from the "this was all Larry's fault" camp can all agree on some of those simple things right?

Curry, JJ and Mo Taylor will all show up to camp in great, NBA basketball shape right?
That Curry and Frye will put a body on a man everytime a shot goes up because thats what good rebounders do right?
That Nate will hustle down court after he hits a shot so he doesnt get beat in transition showing off for the crowd right?
That Nate will pressure the ball because thats what a 5'9 guard should do right?
That Francis will gladly share minutes because its the right thing to do right? Work and earn his floor time.. right?
That a FranBury backcourt will be focused on defense and making the whole team better right?

I mean, now that all the distractions and Larry negativity are gone I'm looking forward to all these things happening. Ive always thought this roster had a lot of talent. Now that nothing is holding them back it should be really interesting to see them take over.

Hoops is fun right Earl?

BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

7/7/2006  2:55 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
I expect the difference between this season and last to be dramatic.

I do to, I just don't have faith it will last.

We were above .500 with Lenny until Marbury went on his self-aggrandizing rant and we immediately went into a franchise worst plummet that we've yet to come out of. The team chemistry was awful and in spite of trading KT he found new enemies, and we find ourselves with the players themselves still telling us this team needs guys who put the team before themselves while guys like Marbury and francis keep telling us what THEY need.

I expect us to get off to a brisk pace, just as we did in 04-05. I just don't trust the the entitlement gang wont wreak havoc over time and erode the fragile foundations of this club. In fact, with Marbury, Francis and Curry as foundations this club is on borrowed time until guys like Lee and Frye are ready to emerge as leaders and/or meaningful veteran leadership is added.

But a good start, or even a good year, is not out of the question.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/7/2006  3:00 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

But a good start, or even a good year, is not out of the question.

i agree. 40 wins is not out of the realm of possibility. and everyone here will be doing backflips. but when we don't break 45 wins 2 years after that with this roster is when the cycle will repeat.

big picture...always about the big picture.

9/10 man rotation will leave many poster's favorites riding the pine. i'd like to hear their reactions at that point.
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/7/2006  3:01 PM
LOL...The ENTITLEMENT GANG!!LOLOLOL....HAHAHAHAHAH....

http://www.ultimateentitlement.com.
~You can't run from who you are.~
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/7/2006  3:07 PM
and oohah - 0mph to 100mph is going from 23 wins to 56 wins.

i'm asking for 55mph (speed limit) since many think we should've been going 35mph last season.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/7/2006  3:09 PM
As I've said before, last year I expected the team to falter under Brown because that what his history dictates, but at the same time history dictates that in the 2nd year his teams jump in the Win column significantly and I would have expcted the same here. Somewhere around 45 wins I would have expected this year had the team still been under Brown. In the past Brown got his way and thats why the teams jumped in the Win column. Thats why I think the Knicks would have gotten 45 wins this year under Brown becuase like all other stops he would have gotten his players. Moot point now though.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07-07-2006 3:10 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
7/7/2006  3:12 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by codeunknown:

Some here have done that. But, the LB detractors are no less. Not only did LB throw the season but he tricked his family into moving to New York and buying a house. Scoundrel.
FYI, many Brownies conceede that he threw the season. What is your point about 'tricking' his family into buing a house? He bought a house in a city where he signed a 5 year 60 million dollar contract. He had a house in Michigan too. What is your point?

In all seriousness, Killa, the point is I don't believe he bought the house that late in the season as a front. I think he believed he was staying for the long haul. And that he was going to implement his strategy. And that itself circumstantially supports his commitment to the team. Whether or not you like his practices.

The other alternative, as I sarcastically described, is that he bought it to gain leverage in arbitration with Stern. One can't be sure. Only that slick bastard, LB, knows for a fact.

Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
7/7/2006  3:22 PM
Posted by codeunknown:
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by codeunknown:

Some here have done that. But, the LB detractors are no less. Not only did LB throw the season but he tricked his family into moving to New York and buying a house. Scoundrel.
FYI, many Brownies conceede that he threw the season. What is your point about 'tricking' his family into buing a house? He bought a house in a city where he signed a 5 year 60 million dollar contract. He had a house in Michigan too. What is your point?

In all seriousness, Killa, the point is I don't believe he bought the house that late in the season as a front. I think he believed he was staying for the long haul. And that he was going to implement his strategy. And that itself circumstantially supports his commitment to the team. Whether or not you like his practices.

The other alternative, as I sarcastically described, is that he bought it to gain leverage in arbitration with Stern. One can't be sure. Only that slick bastard, LB, knows for a fact.

Whether he planned on staying or not is irrelevant from my standpoint, it isn't my $40 million. What matters is the kind of job he did last year as our coach, and by any ojective standard, it was completely horrendous. We could have kept him, but based on all of the available evidence, he definitely earned this firing.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
7/7/2006  3:38 PM
the hiccup that was lb was under isiah's regime. he can't blame lb b/c he brought in lb. lb's failures is isiah's failures. they are not independant. it was under his regime. so in his first full season, the team won 33 games. in the 2nd season, it won 23 games. the GM during this time? isiah thomas. so we're now onto year three. when he was hired, and you were told the payroll is around $130 mil and after making 40+ transactions, what would you expect this season?

if lb remained, i would expect a pretty big roster overhaul. with that said, i have no idea who would be here or who wouldn't. lb was signed on for 5 years, which meant it was 4-5 year plan. looking at lb as year 1 of the new plan, i would expect the knicks to be challenging for playoffs in year 2 and definitely playoffs/division in year 3 and higher aspirations in year 4.

but lb was fired and blamed. so in essence, he was just a part of year 2 in the isiah plan. so now we're in year 3 of the isiah plan. that's the difference.

and with the players blaming lb. with dolan blaming lb. and with isiah blaming lb and saying "he likes our players and is comfortable with them", let's see what $135 mil gets you.

so to me, no playoffs, no .500, no isiah.

Oy, I still don't know the answer! Apparently IT and Dolan were not willing to make wholesale changes, so had LB stayed, and coached the same team that Isiah will coach, what record would have made you happy?

and oohah - 0mph to 100mph is going from 23 wins to 56 wins.

i'm asking for 55mph (speed limit) since many think we should've been going 35mph last season.

Well the "Speed Limit" to me right now is around .500 or the playoffs. Let's not forget, the last guy to drive this car F'ed up the transmission by switching gears at the wrong speed and slamming it into reverse. And he ruined the brakes with the constant starting and stopping.

So don't expect Isiah to slam on the accelerator. He needs to gradually get up to speed, learn the car and find out how it handles.

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 07-07-2006 3:42 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
nate,lee and frye spill the beans about last year (article)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy