fishmike wrote:There is a mountain of evidence that shows you win nothing without star players that impact the game. Im pretty sure that will be the driving force behind his resigning here. As for his value thats your opinion. The fact is however his value is set by supply and demand. That value is a max contract. So if the Knicks are going to retain that talent is reuqires writing checks. As for letting him walk I have yet to see the arguement that makes sense. I would prefer to pay Durant or CP3 the max but we have Melo and he is an impact player.If your plan to win a title isnt immediate then it makes even more sense to sign him. Like the Lakers do you rebuild while you win. Look at ALL the moves since Melo got here, and the Knicks with all that ineptitude still made the playoffs 3/4 times (first losing record in Melo's NBA career btw). Why does having MElo here mean Phil cant use the draft and make good trades as he did with Dallas?
If you want a tank I hear you, but thats a blueprint that yields even less than trying to win a title with a flawed player.
Those teams were built under the old CBA which makes any comparison pretty much worthless in this discussion. Old CBA where u can add a full MLE player every year and sign and trade players overpaying wasnt that big of a deal because u could add a legit starter every season. This CBA it more important ot manage your cap properly and my opinion overpaying Melo is a bad idea.
Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com