[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Melo Is As Good As It Gets
Author Thread
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
2/1/2014  9:07 AM
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
AUTOADVERT
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/1/2014  10:14 AM
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

I don't post anywhere else, so spare me your comparisons to your other pals. And I'm pointing out your own logic/arguments to you, and you find that spiteful and nasty?

You understand the game? do you even play the game? You want the Knicks to build to a championship, and they're not doing it to your satisfaction. I, on the other hand, am a Knicks fan, no matter what the **** they do. How much understanding, negative bravado do I need to hang with the dktf on the NBA SME level that you obviously own? I'd like to think of myself in terms of positive homerism Mooby worship (Copyright Nalod Inc, LLC 2014), rather than any kind of negativism. For the love of shinola, I've got a part time job now sticking up for Crazy crackhead JerseyRiver Smith, how much more positive do I need to be?

And you do realize you're calling a homer out for "negative bravado" when you're a card carrying Somber peeing on a 4 game win streak, right? How does that work for you?

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

2/1/2014  10:16 AM
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

I don't post anywhere else, so spare me your comparisons to your other pals. And I'm pointing out your own logic/arguments to you, and you find that spiteful and nasty?

You understand the game? do you even play the game? You want the Knicks to build to a championship, and they're not doing it to your satisfaction. I, on the other hand, am a Knicks fan, no matter what the **** they do. How much understanding, negative bravado do I need to hang with the dktf on the NBA SME level that you obviously own? I'd like to think of myself in terms of positive homerism Mooby worship (Copyright Nalod Inc, LLC 2014), rather than any kind of negativism. For the love of shinola, I've got a part time job now sticking up for Crazy crackhead JerseyRiver Smith, how much more positive do I need to be?

And you do realize you're calling a homer out for "negative bravado" when you're a card carrying Somber peeing on a 4 game win streak, right? How does that work for you?

Personally i think you go a bit too far. Im a positive Knick fan but i also like that other fans have different opinions.
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/1/2014  10:23 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

I don't post anywhere else, so spare me your comparisons to your other pals. And I'm pointing out your own logic/arguments to you, and you find that spiteful and nasty?

You understand the game? do you even play the game? You want the Knicks to build to a championship, and they're not doing it to your satisfaction. I, on the other hand, am a Knicks fan, no matter what the **** they do. How much understanding, negative bravado do I need to hang with the dktf on the NBA SME level that you obviously own? I'd like to think of myself in terms of positive homerism Mooby worship (Copyright Nalod Inc, LLC 2014), rather than any kind of negativism. For the love of shinola, I've got a part time job now sticking up for Crazy crackhead JerseyRiver Smith, how much more positive do I need to be?

And you do realize you're calling a homer out for "negative bravado" when you're a card carrying Somber peeing on a 4 game win streak, right? How does that work for you?

Personally i think you go a bit too far. Im a positive Knick fan but i also like that other fans have different opinions.

Ahhhhhhhh it's just the internet. I'm killing time at work not working. My post count isn't even that high. Pathetically low, actually
I just have a personal tic about incoherency, or what I percieve as incoherent. It's not like I'm banning people or anything. Frankly, my one goal in UK life is to get on everyone else's ignore list

And you're right, if everyone was all positive and happy it would get boring in here. I've already expressed my appreciation of posters like tkf.

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

2/1/2014  10:26 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/1/2014  10:27 AM
jrodmc wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

I don't post anywhere else, so spare me your comparisons to your other pals. And I'm pointing out your own logic/arguments to you, and you find that spiteful and nasty?

You understand the game? do you even play the game? You want the Knicks to build to a championship, and they're not doing it to your satisfaction. I, on the other hand, am a Knicks fan, no matter what the **** they do. How much understanding, negative bravado do I need to hang with the dktf on the NBA SME level that you obviously own? I'd like to think of myself in terms of positive homerism Mooby worship (Copyright Nalod Inc, LLC 2014), rather than any kind of negativism. For the love of shinola, I've got a part time job now sticking up for Crazy crackhead JerseyRiver Smith, how much more positive do I need to be?

And you do realize you're calling a homer out for "negative bravado" when you're a card carrying Somber peeing on a 4 game win streak, right? How does that work for you?

Personally i think you go a bit too far. Im a positive Knick fan but i also like that other fans have different opinions.

Ahhhhhhhh it's just the internet. I'm killing time at work not working. My post count isn't even that high. Pathetically low, actually
I just have a personal tic about incoherency, or what I percieve as incoherent. It's not like I'm banning people or anything. Frankly, my one goal in UK life is to get on everyone else's ignore list

And you're right, if everyone was all positive and happy it would get boring in here. I've already expressed my appreciation of posters like tkf.

Ok cool. The only reason i was saying that is because despite being a positive Knick fan i also understand why some are upset a lot. The past 14 yaers havent been too kind to knick fans especially for people like me who grew up watching the great 90's knicks
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/1/2014  11:14 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

I don't post anywhere else, so spare me your comparisons to your other pals. And I'm pointing out your own logic/arguments to you, and you find that spiteful and nasty?

You understand the game? do you even play the game? You want the Knicks to build to a championship, and they're not doing it to your satisfaction. I, on the other hand, am a Knicks fan, no matter what the **** they do. How much understanding, negative bravado do I need to hang with the dktf on the NBA SME level that you obviously own? I'd like to think of myself in terms of positive homerism Mooby worship (Copyright Nalod Inc, LLC 2014), rather than any kind of negativism. For the love of shinola, I've got a part time job now sticking up for Crazy crackhead JerseyRiver Smith, how much more positive do I need to be?

And you do realize you're calling a homer out for "negative bravado" when you're a card carrying Somber peeing on a 4 game win streak, right? How does that work for you?

Personally i think you go a bit too far. Im a positive Knick fan but i also like that other fans have different opinions.

Ahhhhhhhh it's just the internet. I'm killing time at work not working. My post count isn't even that high. Pathetically low, actually
I just have a personal tic about incoherency, or what I percieve as incoherent. It's not like I'm banning people or anything. Frankly, my one goal in UK life is to get on everyone else's ignore list

And you're right, if everyone was all positive and happy it would get boring in here. I've already expressed my appreciation of posters like tkf.

Ok cool. The only reason i was saying that is because despite being a positive Knick fan i also understand why some are upset a lot. The past 14 yaers havent been too kind to knick fans especially for people like me who grew up watching the great 90's knicks
You can always second guess what the team/organization is doing. However, some keep harping on one guy and since he has been here he has played his @ss off and the Knicks have won more than they have in a decade. The topic gets pushed into almost every thread and can be annoying. Sometimes it is fun to point out the ridiculousness of what is being said but for a team fan site, a couple of posters seem very intent on pushing a negative agenda against the team and one player.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
2/2/2014  2:59 PM
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-1
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

update they are now 2-11 against legitimate playoff teams

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/3/2014  12:15 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/3/2014  12:23 PM
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

Great point and having dealings with those individuals myself, I can see exactly what you mean. Instead of addressing what you post they tend to focus on the poster, as if they know you. i do find it nasty and out of line..... I don't get it..

not to direct this at Jrod per say, (although at times, he will seem to go after the poster a bit in a snide way) but when you mentioned those other names from the other site it brought to mind some of my darker times on internet forums.. LOL

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/3/2014  12:29 PM
well... the winning streak is over, and look who shows up. Typical
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/3/2014  3:20 PM
fishmike wrote:well... the winning streak is over, and look who shows up. Typical

Don't focus on the poster, fish, only the posts. Even when they're about the poster. Or something like that.


Somber logic is so confusing. Must need a master's degree in subject matter expertise to grasp it.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/3/2014  3:22 PM
fishmike wrote:well... the winning streak is over, and look who shows up. Typical

hey shamgod.. and what does this have to do with winning and losing.. we are not even talking about a game.. and what winning streak? rofl

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/3/2014  3:23 PM
jrodmc wrote:
fishmike wrote:well... the winning streak is over, and look who shows up. Typical

Don't focus on the poster, fish, only the posts. Even when they're about the poster. Or something like that.


Somber logic is so confusing. Must need a master's degree in subject matter expertise to grasp it.


keep proving dk correct..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

2/3/2014  5:09 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Uptown wrote:
dk7th wrote:now that some of you have had your fun with venom and vitriol, lets come back to reality.

knicks wins against new jersey generals-level nba teams just don't turn my crank. if you infer that i don't watch or comment because melobury is doing well in these empty regular-season games that's on you. just consider that what he does lately is against non-playoff competition. exciting

when the knicks reach .500 i will start watching again in earnest. until then i will watch only those games against good legitimate playoff teams. how do you imagine melo will do against these teams? here is the record so far:

miami 1-0
indiana 0-2
okc 0-1
portland 0-1
clippers 0-2
spurs 1-1
houston 0-2

they are 2-10 this season against legitimate teams. but hooray for melo!

Dude, you were trashing the Knicks last year when were 25+ games over .500 and were beating elite teams in the reg season....All you do is adjust your hate accordingly....

the operative phrase in your post is "regular season" since it's all about the playoffs.... ergo there is no need to "adjust" since the end result will be the same: best case scenario is another second round annihilation. see how that works? besides, i have said since before the season that implosion was a distinct probability, with 37 wins the end result. do you realize that if they play .500 ball from here on out they will reach that lofty goal of 37 wins? and that in order to reach 43 wins and a presumed 3rd seed that they will have to go 24-12 which is .660 ball?

even so it's all about playoff success. first round appearances mean absolutely nothing, zero, nada, zilch. how is a first round appearance any sort of accomplishment? or edifying? or a second round annihilation? knicks fans standards are too low.

a competitive second round was a melo/woodson knick squad incarnation's ceiling, and they didn't even get to that. this season will end worse. how does that make you feel? bitter maybe? or does eternal hope and the fallback position of being entertained sweeten things?

Just wondering why you are always asking fans how they feel. Obviously fans are excited that there has been some good play and hope that things turn around and maybe there will be some magic this spring. You missed out on a great ride last year focusing in on negativity. Fans root for their team. They are up when they are winning and down when they aren't. It really is pretty basic. Most fans don't have an agenda against the team or players on the team they root for.

nothing is more basic than winning and losing. "ups and downs"? what does that mean unless you just live for the moment? i want my team to build a champion. what do you want?

So lets see what turns the crank:
1) Not living for the moment, but pointing out any and all past failures, current angst, and downgrading any current wins and past successes.
2) A Chip. Now.
3) Boo Melo Boo!
4) 1st round wins 2nd round playoffs soon to be followed by: 2nd round wins ECF ECF wins Finals Chip or nothing

Lather, rinse, repeat.

martin, is there any possibility of installing a "new, fresh and inventive Melo hate post" function?

you remind me a great deal of my old pals at realgm, moocow and godshamgod. they are not really into talking about basketball, just all about being spite and nasty. do you actually understand the game? or is all the negative bravado simply a front to mask this deficiency?

I don't post anywhere else, so spare me your comparisons to your other pals. And I'm pointing out your own logic/arguments to you, and you find that spiteful and nasty?

You understand the game? do you even play the game? You want the Knicks to build to a championship, and they're not doing it to your satisfaction. I, on the other hand, am a Knicks fan, no matter what the **** they do. How much understanding, negative bravado do I need to hang with the dktf on the NBA SME level that you obviously own? I'd like to think of myself in terms of positive homerism Mooby worship (Copyright Nalod Inc, LLC 2014), rather than any kind of negativism. For the love of shinola, I've got a part time job now sticking up for Crazy crackhead JerseyRiver Smith, how much more positive do I need to be?

And you do realize you're calling a homer out for "negative bravado" when you're a card carrying Somber peeing on a 4 game win streak, right? How does that work for you?

Personally i think you go a bit too far. Im a positive Knick fan but i also like that other fans have different opinions.

Ahhhhhhhh it's just the internet. I'm killing time at work not working. My post count isn't even that high. Pathetically low, actually
I just have a personal tic about incoherency, or what I percieve as incoherent. It's not like I'm banning people or anything. Frankly, my one goal in UK life is to get on everyone else's ignore list

And you're right, if everyone was all positive and happy it would get boring in here. I've already expressed my appreciation of posters like tkf.

Ok cool. The only reason i was saying that is because despite being a positive Knick fan i also understand why some are upset a lot. The past 14 yaers havent been too kind to knick fans especially for people like me who grew up watching the great 90's knicks

Papabear Says

Yes but some people take it so personal that no matter what the team does it's not good enough. They personally hate a player with emotions almost like they want to see that person harmed or hurt or injured.There are lots of people on this forum who have a negative opinion on the Knicks But when the knicks does something good or positive they are happy and speak positive about it. But some haters are not even satisfied even if we win. Thats still not good enough. When we won 54 games last season they still could not be positive. They say regular season games are not important and irrilavent. My thing is so why are they posting now.

Papabear
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/3/2014  5:17 PM
Maybe "they" enjoy tormenting you!
Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

2/3/2014  5:35 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/3/2014  5:37 PM
Papabear Says

One of the poster haters I do have on ignore because when a person is so riddled with such hate personally on a player I believe is crossing the line. This Knicks team is owned by Dolan. There are many teams in the NBA. None of these guys have one dime invested in this franchise. No one tells them what type of suit to buy if they own one So they can't tell Dolan how to spend his money. I was a big Coca Cola fan years ago until I found out that right after world war 2 they went to Germany and gave Max Schmeling 1 million dollar to be a sponsor of Coca Cola and didn't give Joe Lewis the Boxing Champ a dime. Government took all of Joe Lewis money and property because of taxes on gross monies he earned and they added interest. The sad thing was that they charge Lewis on monies that was paid to his managers and other workers. I hated Coca Cola. But you know what?? in time I changed because Coca Cola changed. They sponsored a lot of things in poor neighborhoods. I started drinking Coca Cola again. All is forgiven. Maybe some of you Melo haters can take a second look and see the good Melo is doing with his game and you can change your hating way?? Naa I doubt it Keep on hatin. That's all you know how to do. I will never believe they are true knick fans.

Papabear
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
2/3/2014  6:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/3/2014  6:14 PM
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

One of the poster haters I do have on ignore because when a person is so riddled with such hate personally on a player I believe is crossing the line. This Knicks team is owned by Dolan. There are many teams in the NBA. None of these guys have one dime invested in this franchise. No one tells them what type of suit to buy if they own one So they can't tell Dolan how to spend his money. I was a big Coca Cola fan years ago until I found out that right after world war 2 they went to Germany and gave Max Shelling 1 million dollar to be a sponsor of Coca Cola and didn't give Joe Lewis the Boxing Champ a dime. Government took all of Joe Lewis money and property because of taxes on gross monies he earned and they added interest. The sad thing was that they charge Lewis on monies that was paid to his managers and other workers. I hated Coca Cola. But you know what?? in time I changed because Coca Cola changed. They sponsored a lot of things in poor neighborhoods. I started drinking Coca Cola again. All is forgiven. Maybe some of you Melo haters can take a second look and see the good Melo is doing with his game and you can change your hating way?? Naa I doubt it Keep on hatin. That's all you know how to do. I will never believe they are true knick fans.


I would be the first to admit that I dislike Melo for reasons on and off the court
I do not consider myself a hater though and I do give ways in which I think we can build a contending team with MELO and for him to take less money for 1 year and then get rewarded after in contracts and becoming future partners with Dolan in other area's to generate more money
He is a talented scorer but he needs highly skilled players that compliment him like he had in TEAM USA but those talents don't come cheap
I don't think you can pay a starting salary at 27m with raises starting this summer for those reasons, for GOD SAKES that is half the entire salary cap for a 12 man roster
With that salary you can pay 2 MAX salaries that are younger, it is just not money well spent, and with this CBA we loss our ability to BUY talent, especially overpaying for it


I am a Knick's fan first Papa Bear, in other words, I root for the best interest of the Knick's and the best team that they possibly can be in order to contend
We have different opinions and I am fine with that, but sometimes you go too far with your own opinions and dislikes for others thoughts here

If we are thinking about ever contending, my ideal team has to be able to challenge the Indiana Pacer's because I see their team only improving and they are all young with a few veterans
I can't justify paying Melo what Paul George and Hibbert would both add up to, and I do think Paul George is the more complete player, something I said last year already
Now if you are happy with POSSIBLY making the playoffs and possibly being in the 6th to 12th in the East, then overpaying in order to keep Melo isn't a bad idea if it continues to fill seats as a business
But if we continue to lose, it won't justify the prices for the tickets, and it wont be good for business

Unlike some other posters that you might characterize me as a "HATER" for Melo, I give examples on how we pay Melo a large amount of money AFTER 2016 both on and off the court for MELO's POV, Dolan's POV, and have a team that has the talent to contend

but by going this route, like Brigg's has said, we are losing leverage on possible trades, and risk losing him walk for NO COMPENSATION at all, or OVERPAYING for him that will NOT allow us to ever contend as long as he is here
In the end, we have to develop players, Lance Stephenson is a prime example that took years to develop and a risk
He was surrounded with high character players, a TEAM SYSTEM, and veterans
However, we don't believe in the development of players and that is something I think we need to change in order to get better

Getting rid of Woodson, all of the coaching staff, a new GM, and having coaches that will take no CRAP and lay the law with success and Dolan out of his business such as Poppavich and Buford. A team of coaches, that values development, finding the balance between talent, work ethic, motivated leaders (like Durant/Westbrook/Harden, Lebron/Wade/Bosh, Paul George/Roy Hibbert/David West, the work they put in off and off the court has a multiple chain reaction effect on one another, and veterans to mentor them

NO ONE person is greater than the game and sacrifices must be made on and off the court, it is what it is
In the end the greatest stat and only stat that matters is the W, not personal achievements

We need a coach that is willing to put these players in their place, as Woody once called in accountability, instead of enabling poor shot selection and schemes/plays that do not work
Woodson doesn't utilize his rotations and players well, he runs mainly a spread offense, with mainly ISO, some PnR, and tries to use the C to pull the opponents Center out from shot blocking/rebounding with Chandler

I have no doubt and believe we could have built a much better team than the one we currently had if Donnie Walsh finished his job, instead of Dolan stepping in
Call me what you want, our record in the playoffs speaks for itself, even without the trade for Melo, could we have done any worse than we did that year?
He was a WANT, not a NEED, we had 3 fine F's in Fields/Wilson Chandler/Gallo that working working well together and were young, heck we could have flipped some of them for future assets as well, being part of future CP3 and D12 trade talks at the right price, if we got rid of Felton at a high price like Denver was smart enough to do

We could have kept all those assets and just continue to watch spending, collect assets
Wait patiently, another team will want those assets, especially when you collect enough assets, like Houston did and now the Sun's, Boston, Celtics are all doing, they got an ALL STAR in Harden for less than half of what we gave up, including saving Denver 50m in salary/taxes

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/3/2014  6:16 PM
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

One of the poster haters I do have on ignore because when a person is so riddled with such hate personally on a player I believe is crossing the line. This Knicks team is owned by Dolan. There are many teams in the NBA. None of these guys have one dime invested in this franchise. No one tells them what type of suit to buy if they own one So they can't tell Dolan how to spend his money. I was a big Coca Cola fan years ago until I found out that right after world war 2 they went to Germany and gave Max Schmeling 1 million dollar to be a sponsor of Coca Cola and didn't give Joe Lewis the Boxing Champ a dime. Government took all of Joe Lewis money and property because of taxes on gross monies he earned and they added interest. The sad thing was that they charge Lewis on monies that was paid to his managers and other workers. I hated Coca Cola. But you know what?? in time I changed because Coca Cola changed. They sponsored a lot of things in poor neighborhoods. I started drinking Coca Cola again. All is forgiven. Maybe some of you Melo haters can take a second look and see the good Melo is doing with his game and you can change your hating way?? Naa I doubt it Keep on hatin. That's all you know how to do. I will never believe they are true knick fans.


You seem to care more about Melo than about the Knicks. Most of these guys just want the Knicks to win and don't police or monitor everyone's thoughts about Melo or any other player.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

2/3/2014  8:52 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

One of the poster haters I do have on ignore because when a person is so riddled with such hate personally on a player I believe is crossing the line. This Knicks team is owned by Dolan. There are many teams in the NBA. None of these guys have one dime invested in this franchise. No one tells them what type of suit to buy if they own one So they can't tell Dolan how to spend his money. I was a big Coca Cola fan years ago until I found out that right after world war 2 they went to Germany and gave Max Schmeling 1 million dollar to be a sponsor of Coca Cola and didn't give Joe Lewis the Boxing Champ a dime. Government took all of Joe Lewis money and property because of taxes on gross monies he earned and they added interest. The sad thing was that they charge Lewis on monies that was paid to his managers and other workers. I hated Coca Cola. But you know what?? in time I changed because Coca Cola changed. They sponsored a lot of things in poor neighborhoods. I started drinking Coca Cola again. All is forgiven. Maybe some of you Melo haters can take a second look and see the good Melo is doing with his game and you can change your hating way?? Naa I doubt it Keep on hatin. That's all you know how to do. I will never believe they are true knick fans.


You seem to care more about Melo than about the Knicks. Most of these guys just want the Knicks to win and don't police or monitor everyone's thoughts about Melo or any other player.
This
alwaysaknick
Posts: 20192
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 12/9/2013
Member: #5711

2/4/2014  1:02 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says

One of the poster haters I do have on ignore because when a person is so riddled with such hate personally on a player I believe is crossing the line. This Knicks team is owned by Dolan. There are many teams in the NBA. None of these guys have one dime invested in this franchise. No one tells them what type of suit to buy if they own one So they can't tell Dolan how to spend his money. I was a big Coca Cola fan years ago until I found out that right after world war 2 they went to Germany and gave Max Schmeling 1 million dollar to be a sponsor of Coca Cola and didn't give Joe Lewis the Boxing Champ a dime. Government took all of Joe Lewis money and property because of taxes on gross monies he earned and they added interest. The sad thing was that they charge Lewis on monies that was paid to his managers and other workers. I hated Coca Cola. But you know what?? in time I changed because Coca Cola changed. They sponsored a lot of things in poor neighborhoods. I started drinking Coca Cola again. All is forgiven. Maybe some of you Melo haters can take a second look and see the good Melo is doing with his game and you can change your hating way?? Naa I doubt it Keep on hatin. That's all you know how to do. I will never believe they are true knick fans.


You seem to care more about Melo than about the Knicks. Most of these guys just want the Knicks to win and don't police or monitor everyone's thoughts about Melo or any other player.

Right. Maybe he is the one to be personal?

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/4/2014  12:16 PM
i think for all intent and purpose, it looks like melo really doesn't make that big a difference.

the team wins or losses b/c of everyone else.

melo gets his #'s every single game. he plays the same way and he will always give you the same numbers.

but that really has little effect on the w/l column.

it's his supporting cast that determines that. it's on them to perform.

with that said, it's obvious that melo does not lift the play of his teammates...and dare i say, his teammates are scared of him. they constantly defer to him.

the only example i can really use is my own raptors when rudy was playing here. the team just didn't seem at easy and everyone played much tighter b/c they felt they had to give rudy the ball and everyone's touches were very limited throughout the game. it wasn't until he left did everyone get used and everyone stayed on their toes engaged in the action.

knicks have 2 choices, build a team that caters to melo - meaning surround him with strong defenders and guys that don't mind if they don't get shots. plus they also need to be long distance shooters.

OR

move him, build up the value of the players they do have and then move them. so basically a re-set.

very tough predicament since they are handcuffed by an idiot owner.

Melo Is As Good As It Gets

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy