holfresh wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:holfresh wrote:TeamBall wrote:holfresh wrote:TeamBall wrote:holfresh wrote:TeamBall wrote:So you don't see guys switching and doubling out there?
I saw guys doing lots of stuff that I'm certain the coach didn't tell them to do...
I saw guys doing stuff that I'm certain the coach did tell them to do like switching and doubling when they didn't need to. That's the issue.
Then you are calling the coach a liar...
Actually I'm not. He stated that he only doesnt want the 1 and the 5 to switch (which they do anyway). He still has our other guys switch when they don't need to.
That's not what I actually heard Woodson say in interviews..
Either way you look at it its on Woody for not immediately calling a timeout the 1st time he saw a unnecessary switch. I gave Woody the benefit of the doubt but he does so many things that go against winning.
True, he could have called a time out after Blatche 4th consecutive wide open jumper..
Why wait so long? Why continue to play Bargs and Tyson together despite the fact that they suck together? Why comment on how good teams keep the same line up and then say he will adjust his lineups based on who the knicks play. Why have a long hook with Felton after several back 2 back 2 back 2 back 2 back...... bad plays. Why continue to run Melo/Tyson into the ground in a blowout. Why send subs immediately to the table after a time out with 2 minutes left in a blow out instead of subbing during? That's a lot of whys. lol.
Anyway, Why not go zone? Their zones have actually been pretty good. I think it would be interesting to try it. A box in one with Shump out front and Bargs/Felton high & Melo/Chandler low. I want Bargs high for his length and the wing three is the hardest three and I don't trust him guarding the corners.
