TMS wrote:itchetrigr wrote:loweyecue wrote:
Don't waste your time, some people can't see the forest because of the trees.
some people are bent out of shape over a few assets, now i know its tough swallowing come draft day and we're not picking a first or trading away unrealized potential but cap space itself is a great asset, and miami proved it. sure if walsh knows what we all do now, he keeps hill & those picks, signs amare or boozer and watches the other teams fight it out for supremacy having no real shot at lebron or wade. so we end up with our picks in the same position we are now minus a mosgov\felton or the david lee trade, their choice & trying to sell a combination of that to denver...
get one of them to explain to me how that scenario is so much better than what we have now
so because we tried & we failed, you consider the trade a success? hey, the Yankees tried to make the WS this year by trading for scrubs like Javy Vazquez & Lance Berkman, but they didn't get there... try telling Yankee fans how successful those trades ended up being this year.
some people would like for this franchise to make SMART trades & not give away future assets for $9M in cap space that ended up getting us Ray Felton.
damned if you do damned if you dont. Everyone knew Lebron had NY ties and this was the most unheard of player movement as far as stars go in the history of the league. You and I have debated from the MSG boards to this one for close to 10 years now about the Knicks and I thinnk you would agree with me... it comes down to how to get a super star you can build your team around. In Walsh's mind a core of Gallo/Chandler/Douglas/Walker was not good enough to lure a superstar FA here. WE need to be able to court TWO star players that would be a combo.
TMS there isnt a single rational person here that will tell you the Hill trade was a good BB trade. Walsh himself said it wasnt. It was a financial trade and the gamble was to end up with two max guys.
Your suggesting by not making that trade we would have better assets to build around Amare, but thats having your cake and eating too. The Knicks were a 29 win team and losing their best players (Lee, Harrington, etc). How can you say Amare would want to come here with no immediate help on the way?
The arguement shouldnt revolve around the Hill trade, because that trade and space was key in getting Amare here. The ability to add another star was key. You can deny that was a big factor in coming here.
If you want to make an arguement that we should just have passed on the FA thing, resigned Lee and focused on the draft fine. But I can only imagine fan's reaction to the Knicks not being involved in this summer.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs