[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Now I like Isiah more. He is not always a snake, sometimes he is honest...
Author Thread
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/18/2007  10:55 PM
Alternate Take

Person one: Isiah is a snake

Person two: Does that mean Bill Belichiek a snake?

Person one: hey stop changing the subject

Person two: I'm just asking a question

Person 3, 4, 5 and 6: What are you talking about?

Person 7 : Just let me share a viewpoint on institutionalized racism in america...

Person 8: You need to get over it

Person 7: Lemme explain...

Person 9: You are a racist for mentioning race

Person 7: but I'm trying to share an opinion

Person 4: I don't wanna hear it, besides now I'm getting tired

Person 10: Isiah is a snake

once a knick always a knick
AUTOADVERT
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/18/2007  11:08 PM
Allanfan - how does speaking of race "hurt" the quality of this "great" message board?

If this message board was so "great" it would seem to me that it would welcome divergent opinion on any topic that tangetally relates to basketball - which race does.

As uncomfortable as it may feel, you may need to consider the harsh reallity that the subject isn't going to disappear anytime soon.





once a knick always a knick
Allanfan20
Posts: 36027
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
9/19/2007  1:06 AM
Misterearl, I am not blind. I am well aware that the issue will not dissapear anytime soon. However, this is a basketball forum. Not a race forum. I don't mind talking about it now and then, but when most people come on, I would assume they get turned away b/c most of the topics are leading to race as opposed to basketball. Also, most of us, including myself, would far rather be talking about basketball instead. Hence, I said go to a race forum if you really want to talk about it.

And for the record, a number of posters have said they don't come here anymore b/c race was being spoken of too much, and they were good posters.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
NineMike2Whiskey
Posts: 20381
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/10/2004
Member: #732
9/19/2007  1:41 AM
Posted by misterearl:

Allanfan - how does speaking of race "hurt" the quality of this "great" message board?

If this message board was so "great" it would seem to me that it would welcome divergent opinion on any topic that tangetally relates to basketball - which race does.

As uncomfortable as it may feel, you may need to consider the harsh reallity that the subject isn't going to disappear anytime soon.



Well it wouldnt hurt to put race discussions in the OT board like playa2, i mean we've diverted from the topic so much and getting at each other - For what - Isiah????.

Seriously my main beef here is what the hell was Isiah thinking when he made that remark. The media is playing it up, this coming after Marbs clown act outside the courtroom. What is so hard with saying i've got a foul mouth and which may have been intepreted differently by certain ppl. Was there a need to bring up who can and cannot use the b word?. Can the organisation and the ppl that represent it just for once come out with some amount of class this offseason? The trial is starting to look like a pissing match between Anucha and Isiah. Anucha got her some laughs in court at Isiah's expense and Isiah's looking to get one back.

[Edited by - NineMike2Whiskey on 09-19-2007 01:46 AM]
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/19/2007  7:42 AM
"And for the record, a number of posters have said they don't come here anymore b/c race was being spoken of too much, and they were good posters."

Allanfan - please include my name on the list of "bad" posters who critique at the world with a broader perspective than a basketball court.

Any discussion of basketball, specifically Knicks basketball, is welcomed with open arms.

Any mention of race should be banned until the collateral damage of the Anucha-Gate trial is cleaned up or Charlie Weis is fired at Notre Dame. Whichever comes first.
once a knick always a knick
Marv
Posts: 35574
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
9/19/2007  9:05 AM
man i think this is the best thread we've had in a while. if there were ever a place where interest in race relations and interest in the knicks intersect, wouldn’t this be the place?

i find that what makes any post in any thread good or bad is what degree of thought or self-reflection goes into it. when guys are posting just to be battering rams, hammering the same rote point home in the same manner time and time again, then a thread, or at times the whole board, becomes tedious and turns people off.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/19/2007  9:24 AM
"Now Serving 2247..."

Marv - basketballjones made a great point, "No one has to read any thread they don't want to read, and once a topic is moved to the OT area, it dies. I say if guys wanna work on the hard stuff, and can do it civilly, why not let them go for it?"

The only problem with a discussion of race, is that it forces people to think and use parts of the brain that don't get a lot of execrise. That can be an uncomfortable feeling.

Sports, for me, is one of the few remaining places to escape the daily grind. That is one reason I will pull for the Knicks to win, no matter who is ringmastering the circus. Players may may be perceived as useless clowns, and the other guys clowns always seem funnier or more talented - but I will never resort to using insulting language such as calling them "dumb", "lazy" or "stupid" because they are only people with the same human flaws we all walk around with every second of our lives.

It's only basketball. Right?
once a knick always a knick
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/19/2007  9:38 AM
Again when race is appropriate it should be talked about. But in casual everyday conversation it becomes nothing but an annoyance. It is being used on this board as an intimidation tactic, a shout down tactic and the people that do it don't realize they do it. If Marbs or ISiah does something someone doesn't like, they talk about it. Sometimes their choice of words is harsh because this is their team and they are fan(atics). The race card is brought up because of their choice of words. In order to avoid being called a racist or the perception that there criticism was race related they start to avoid and constantly think about the words they use. Instead of speaking from the heart they are now sugarcoating their words. The political correct police strike again with the constant "what did you mean by that". Soon that poster gets sick of sugarcoating and defending themselves everytime they use a word that another poster finds inappropriate that they migrate to another board.

Allanfan and I have posted with a lot of the same posters for 4 or 5 years now. I have gotten the same feedback that he has gotten. We are losing posters that just want to talk basketball. It's sad. Yes race is important. Yes there are times it should be brought up. But so is my family. My family is the most important thing in the world to me. My family shapes every thought I have on every topic. To me my family is always relevant. Yet I do not talk about them here constantly because this is not a family forum. It is a Knick forum. I bring them up on the occassion that a story might be relevant to the topic. I do not search for every excuse to bring them up. This is A forum where Knick fans come to talk about, rant about, complain about and cheer for their favorite team.



[Edited by - bippity10 on 19-09-2007 10:12 AM]
I just hope that people will like me
Nalod
Posts: 72438
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/19/2007  9:39 AM

Jordan and his domestic situation was always kept very private. He did his job on the court and kept his image up. He kept his end of the bargin and promoted the league and his sponsers whom profited from his talent and image. IT has widely been noted his marriage was not that great but they kept an arangement in tact until it no longer could be maintained. Even still, Jordan is selling underwear!

Isiah marriage and public image has also been rather postitive and despite his effeminate smile he kept a nice image up while he was a championship caliber player. He opened his mouth at the wrong times but it was not big deal. What Isiahs problem alway was overstepping his boundries and ability off the court. He polorized Jordan and lost, expressed a bitterness even if sarcastically about Bird being white, and somehow also polorized himself with Bill Davidson and divorced form the piston organization. It seems he has an overinflated sense of self off the basketball court. Race has nothing to do with it.

Does Race play into both Jordan and ISiah? Of course, it plays big. There are a cross section of the american public that enjoys seeing a black man fail. But lets be real, Isiah is a successful man despite the current problem. Jordan is a magnificent success! These men fall from very high levels but still land in the Penthouse! Isiah lacks substance and his reputation does not give him the benefit of the doubt here.

Race will always play around here but really I think most of the posters have handled it as good as one could. In fact, it may be said that our forum shows a great deal of maturity and is a good example of many people form differnt backgrounds are able to come together dispite those differences and have a good time!

If only the world was as good as UK!
Killa4luv
Posts: 27774
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
9/19/2007  10:51 AM
Posted by Nalod:


Jordan and his domestic situation was always kept very private. He did his job on the court and kept his image up. He kept his end of the bargin and promoted the league and his sponsers whom profited from his talent and image. IT has widely been noted his marriage was not that great but they kept an arangement in tact until it no longer could be maintained. Even still, Jordan is selling underwear!

Isiah marriage and public image has also been rather postitive and despite his effeminate smile he kept a nice image up while he was a championship caliber player. He opened his mouth at the wrong times but it was not big deal. What Isiahs problem alway was overstepping his boundries and ability off the court. He polorized Jordan and lost, expressed a bitterness even if sarcastically about Bird being white, and somehow also polorized himself with Bill Davidson and divorced form the piston organization. It seems he has an overinflated sense of self off the basketball court. Race has nothing to do with it.

Does Race play into both Jordan and ISiah? Of course, it plays big. There are a cross section of the american public that enjoys seeing a black man fail. But lets be real, Isiah is a successful man despite the current problem. Jordan is a magnificent success! These men fall from very high levels but still land in the Penthouse! Isiah lacks substance and his reputation does not give him the benefit of the doubt here.

Race will always play around here but really I think most of the posters have handled it as good as one could. In fact, it may be said that our forum shows a great deal of maturity and is a good example of many people form differnt backgrounds are able to come together dispite those differences and have a good time!

If only the world was as good as UK!
Aplaud this man. Nalod, you have kept it pretty real in here and I'd like to applaud you. I co-sign everything you've said here.

This is all I've ever been looking for, is an honest assessment of Isiah and the way race plays into this whole thing. I never pretended to know what actually happened, but I am painfully aware of the way media and 'a cross section of america' as you put it, have framed this, the vick situation and others. Regardless of whether (Isiah, Vick, Bonds, et al) are right or wrong, there is a certain venom with which they are attacked that, to me, is an indication that race 'plays big' in many minds.

Thats been my main point, and also that saying "I dont give a **** about these white people" in the context in which it was allegedly said, isnt a racist remark. But the people who get worked up about it, do not truly grasp what racism and discrimination are about.

And this has been a very civil discussion in here too. Very mature and respectful, no name calling. This is actually more civil than many of the basketball threads.

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 09-19-2007 11:10 AM]
Killa4luv
Posts: 27774
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
9/19/2007  11:07 AM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Killa4luv:

The reality is this:
White people are not being systematically discriminated against, period.
In a host of different ways other groups, people of color, women, gays, poor people are.

And yet, you feel this is undeniably fact, while many would say it's highly debatable (With the exception of gays; That's obvious). For every group you mentioned (including whites), you could argue either side.

Yet you continue to wonder why you come off as hostile. If you want one race to be judged fairly, stop judging another race unfairly.

[Edited by - Solace on Sep 18 2007 2:47 PM]

Simply because many would say its debatable, does not mean these things are actually debatable. There are people 'debating' 2nd hand smoke, global warming and evolution, etc, and none of that mmatters because the science on these things is very clear, global warming, evolution, and second hand smoke are observable, verifiable realities. And tough as it may be to accept, this country didn't solve 300+ years of racism and sexism with an Affirmative action program. Racism and other forms of discrimination are also observable, verifiable realities.

I dont know on what basis one could argue that institutionalized discrimination is not a reality, but I'd love to hear it. We could start with what I think is not debatable (which is what I thought I was doing in the last post) by going back to the 60's.

Do you think in the 60s there was institutionalized discrimination in this country?
If it existed then, and it doesn't exist now, how exactly do you think the USA eradicated these things?
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/19/2007  11:10 AM
rac·ism [rey-siz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

A person can be guilty of making a racially insensitive remark without raising it to the level of being Racist. For some reason people want to go to far with anything having to do with Isiah. People seem to WANT to find reasons to hate Isiah. If you read the News articles written by Women on the Anucha vs MSG case you get a LOT of venom and a tone that reflects belief in all the accusations made against Isiah. One thing I read really hit home. Someone wrote that the truth is likely somewhere in the middle of all the extremes. Neither side is likely being 100% truthful, so why is it so easy to believe that Isiah must be lying and is likely guilty? After all there is no tape of Isiah actually saying "I don't give a bleep about these white people" That comes from Anucha, who has all kinds of incentive to lie in this case. In fact $10 million reasons. Still this thread and many news articles seem to suggest that people believe he said it. WHY? This is where race seems to come into the equation.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
9/19/2007  11:44 AM
Posted by nixluva:

rac·ism [rey-siz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

There is not more than one human race.
https:// It's not so hard.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/19/2007  1:07 PM
bippity - if the topic makes you so unhappy, why do you keep posting on this thread?



once a knick always a knick
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
9/19/2007  1:23 PM
what if a non-black nba head coach says "i don't give a f*** about those black boys" (when referring to his players in a league where the heavy majority is black), can that statement be put into context? or since this country is still only a few years removed (in the grand scheme of things) from heavy segregation, would this coach be considered a racist?

just curious to hear thoughts on it.

[Edited by - djsunyc on 09-19-2007 1:23 PM]
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/19/2007  1:28 PM
"And this has been a very civil discussion in here too. Very mature and respectful, no name calling. This is actually more civil than many of the basketball threads."

killa4 - totally agree. Unlike bippity who claims people are simply shouting one another down.

I suspect that when the content does not follow the pre-srcibed "majority" view then that view is portrayed as subversive, as if those who talk about race are out to destroy something precious and dear.

The world loves to watch celebrities fall and when stars like Jordan, Barry Bonds, or OJ or Isiah are on the cliff - the world loves to watch the drop. The media repetition makes the fall that much more entertaining by the added number of reps and angles.

Donovan McNabb had the nerve to bring up the subject of race and perception and his days in Philly, win or lose, are undoubtably counting off that much quicker.

Meanwhile, their counterparts - the Bill Belichieks, the Raphael Palmiero's, the Mark McGwire's, the Blackwaters, the Brownie's ("you're doin' a helluva job") are just conducting nefarious business as usual.

and how much hate mail (which is too polite a term for it)and how many death threats did Hank Aaron receive anyway?

and howcum Dee Brown's house in Boston(just as Bill Russell's house in the city he won countless championships) was vandalized to send a clear message "his kind" was not wanted?

certainly not because he used Reebok pumps in the NBA slam dunk contest

and I say, "hell no I ain't "over it" with a calm and controlled voice based on current facts



[Edited by - misterearl on 09-19-2007 1:48 PM]
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/19/2007  1:36 PM
djsu - nice try but...

...the more relevant question dj, is to ask and understand why Spree REALLY felt like strangling Carlissimo?

now, we're talkin' basketball!

[Edited by - misterearl on 09-19-2007 1:51 PM]
once a knick always a knick
Nalod
Posts: 72438
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
9/19/2007  1:51 PM
"I dont give a **** about these white people"

From this white mans perspective that is not a racist statement. Its just really stupid comment. And, given his position as president of the knicks it is grounds for being fired as it shows a lack of any judgement.

The president of any organization should show leadership. To me its ok for Isiah to think such a thing, but never let anyone hear it. It should not be said infront of other co-workers regardless of race.

It is not right, but a black executive at any company is always going to have to be just a bit better than his contemporaries as minorities in this country move up the ladder. It ain't right, but its about moving up the latter.

A white man saying "I don 't give a dam about our black fans" would be fired instantly. There are legions of people that would bring such a statement to light and call for their heads. If Rod Thorn said such a thing Sharpton and his minions would be all over it!

stupid comments are some times just that, but they become racist when bought to the surface.

Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/19/2007  2:39 PM
Once again you twist my words. I have not said anything negative about this particular post. But it definitely does get tedious when a poster questions or criticizes a player/coach/GM and his motives are constantly questioned and race is constantly injected. CAn't make it anymore clear. Respect my point of view on this subject or not. I don't care. It is still my point of view and valid.

On this very website I was once called an uncle tom because I listed my two favorite players on the team as DAvid Lee and Renaldo Balkman. Yes, despite what some believe race is definitely brought from out of no where. If it is relevant such as here it is open season to discuss it. But there are about 4 or 5 people that can somehow make it relevant in any situation as seen in the David Lee/Balkman example

[Edited by - bippity10 on 19-09-2007 2:41 PM]
I just hope that people will like me
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
9/19/2007  3:32 PM
bippity - being callad an Uncle Tom is not an insult.

Actually, it's quite funny.
once a knick always a knick
Now I like Isiah more. He is not always a snake, sometimes he is honest...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy