Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by Cash:

Two things that I thought were interesting about this.

1.) From the Berman blog:

1. Was very amused that Knicks trotted out Mark Aguirre in the fourth quarter on their MSG Network telecast to rave about Curry's conditioning. It looked like a preemptive strike, knowing that a critical column on Curry being a no-show at the Las Vegas workouts was forthcoming. Aguirre said Curry is "way ahead of schedule.'' Actually when I spoke to Aguirre two weeks ago, he said Curry wouldn't start real serious conditioning until mid-July.

2. The statement from Curry's camp about how Isiah needs to figure out how this will work.

I'm hopeful after a full season of Isiah coaching Eddy Curry personally and Isiah knowing that he will have to deal with the consequences of how he sets up the team in the future because he personally will be coaching it(and can't just dump his team that fits together terribly on someone else) he is more mindful of how things
work.

I'm hopeful that Isiah is now selling other gm's instead of selling us knicks fans. I'm hoping that Curry is on his way out, and that Aquire is just covering.

Cash why would you assume Berman is being honest about anything?
He has showed in the past how biased he is and that makes his credibility nill.

Who is Currys camp? I didnt know Curry had a "camp" An unidentified quote from Berman? That carries no weight. In my opinion Berman just like Larry Brooks whenever he wants to say something he just makes up an imaginary unidentified source. I know the Post is a tabloid and Berman is far from a reporter but he couldnt get a job at the Star or the Globe with his nonsense.

Zach and Curry are friends off the court.

Why would a beat reporter risk his livelihood by completely fabricating stories? Especially concerning an organization that is as media conscious as the Knicks and who are more than willing to be vengeful towards people they think did them wrong?

You think being biased (funny how you don't mention reporters like Howard Beck, that are biased towards Isiah) ruins credibility? Fabricating stories completely destroys careers.

LOL You think everything the NY Post prints is true? Peter Vescey must love guys like you.

Berman is not a Reporter. He is a columnist. Reporters are supposed to report the truth. Columnists give there opinions.

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by Cash:

Two things that I thought were interesting about this.

1.) From the Berman blog:

1. Was very amused that Knicks trotted out Mark Aguirre in the fourth quarter on their MSG Network telecast to rave about Curry's conditioning. It looked like a preemptive strike, knowing that a critical column on Curry being a no-show at the Las Vegas workouts was forthcoming. Aguirre said Curry is "way ahead of schedule.'' Actually when I spoke to Aguirre two weeks ago, he said Curry wouldn't start real serious conditioning until mid-July.

2. The statement from Curry's camp about how Isiah needs to figure out how this will work.

I'm hopeful after a full season of Isiah coaching Eddy Curry personally and Isiah knowing that he will have to deal with the consequences of how he sets up the team in the future because he personally will be coaching it(and can't just dump his team that fits together terribly on someone else) he is more mindful of how things
work.

I'm hopeful that Isiah is now selling other gm's instead of selling us knicks fans. I'm hoping that Curry is on his way out, and that Aquire is just covering.

Cash why would you assume Berman is being honest about anything?
He has showed in the past how biased he is and that makes his credibility nill.

Who is Currys camp? I didnt know Curry had a "camp" An unidentified quote from Berman? That carries no weight. In my opinion Berman just like Larry Brooks whenever he wants to say something he just makes up an imaginary unidentified source. I know the Post is a tabloid and Berman is far from a reporter but he couldnt get a job at the Star or the Globe with his nonsense.

Zach and Curry are friends off the court.

Why would a beat reporter risk his livelihood by completely fabricating stories? Especially concerning an organization that is as media conscious as the Knicks and who are more than willing to be vengeful towards people they think did them wrong?

You think being biased (funny how you don't mention reporters like Howard Beck, that are biased towards Isiah) ruins credibility? Fabricating stories completely destroys careers.

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by Pharzeone:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by Cash:

Two things that I thought were interesting about this.

1.) From the Berman blog:

1. Was very amused that Knicks trotted out Mark Aguirre in the fourth quarter on their MSG Network telecast to rave about Curry's conditioning. It looked like a preemptive strike, knowing that a critical column on Curry being a no-show at the Las Vegas workouts was forthcoming. Aguirre said Curry is "way ahead of schedule.'' Actually when I spoke to Aguirre two weeks ago, he said Curry wouldn't start real serious conditioning until mid-July.

2. The statement from Curry's camp about how Isiah needs to figure out how this will work.

I'm hopeful after a full season of Isiah coaching Eddy Curry personally and Isiah knowing that he will have to deal with the consequences of how he sets up the team in the future because he personally will be coaching it(and can't just dump his team that fits together terribly on someone else) he is more mindful of how things
work.

I'm hopeful that Isiah is now selling other gm's instead of selling us knicks fans. I'm hoping that Curry is on his way out, and that Aquire is just covering.

Cash why would you assume Berman is being honest about anything?
He has showed in the past how biased he is and that makes his credibility nill.

Who is Currys camp? I didnt know Curry had a "camp" An unidentified quote from Berman? That carries no weight. In my opinion Berman just like Larry Brooks whenever he wants to say something he just makes up an imaginary unidentified source. I know the Post is a tabloid and Berman is far from a reporter but he couldnt get a job at the Star or the Globe with his nonsense.

Zach and Curry are friends off the court.

Why would a beat reporter risk his livelihood by completely fabricating stories? Especially concerning an organization that is as media conscious as the Knicks and who are more than willing to be vengeful towards people they think did them wrong?

You think being biased (funny how you don't mention reporters like Howard Beck, that are biased towards Isiah) ruins credibility? Fabricating stories completely destroys careers.

LOL, ask Latrell. Berman never proved whether the boat story was true. The post lawyers said that Sprewell and his people couldn't prove that someone told him that story or not, so Sprewell couldn't prove that he it was defamation of character with malicious intent. The Daily News and Times blasted him and the Post for not supporting the story. I am still waiting for support for that story but as he said I guess he doesn't need it to support it.

So what are you saying? That there was no evidence that Berman fabricated a story?

Thanks.

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by Pharzeone:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by Cash:

Two things that I thought were interesting about this.

1.) From the Berman blog:

1. Was very amused that Knicks trotted out Mark Aguirre in the fourth quarter on their MSG Network telecast to rave about Curry's conditioning. It looked like a preemptive strike, knowing that a critical column on Curry being a no-show at the Las Vegas workouts was forthcoming. Aguirre said Curry is "way ahead of schedule.'' Actually when I spoke to Aguirre two weeks ago, he said Curry wouldn't start real serious conditioning until mid-July.

2. The statement from Curry's camp about how Isiah needs to figure out how this will work.

I'm hopeful after a full season of Isiah coaching Eddy Curry personally and Isiah knowing that he will have to deal with the consequences of how he sets up the team in the future because he personally will be coaching it(and can't just dump his team that fits together terribly on someone else) he is more mindful of how things
work.

I'm hopeful that Isiah is now selling other gm's instead of selling us knicks fans. I'm hoping that Curry is on his way out, and that Aquire is just covering.

Cash why would you assume Berman is being honest about anything?
He has showed in the past how biased he is and that makes his credibility nill.

Who is Currys camp? I didnt know Curry had a "camp" An unidentified quote from Berman? That carries no weight. In my opinion Berman just like Larry Brooks whenever he wants to say something he just makes up an imaginary unidentified source. I know the Post is a tabloid and Berman is far from a reporter but he couldnt get a job at the Star or the Globe with his nonsense.

Zach and Curry are friends off the court.

Why would a beat reporter risk his livelihood by completely fabricating stories? Especially concerning an organization that is as media conscious as the Knicks and who are more than willing to be vengeful towards people they think did them wrong?

You think being biased (funny how you don't mention reporters like Howard Beck, that are biased towards Isiah) ruins credibility? Fabricating stories completely destroys careers.

LOL, ask Latrell. Berman never proved whether the boat story was true. The post lawyers said that Sprewell and his people couldn't prove that someone told him that story or not, so Sprewell couldn't prove that he it was defamation of character with malicious intent. The Daily News and Times blasted him and the Post for not supporting the story. I am still waiting for support for that story but as he said I guess he doesn't need it to support it.

So what are you saying? That there was no evidence that Berman fabricated a story?

Thanks.

OK Isles let me ask you a question.

If Marc Berman writes something in the paper does that mean it is true? Yes or no?

I think it means that he believes it to be true when he writes it. Be it personal knowledge or from sources that he believes to be reliable.

I don't think he just makes crap up and prints it the way you do.

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by Pharzeone:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by Cash:

Two things that I thought were interesting about this.

1.) From the Berman blog:

1. Was very amused that Knicks trotted out Mark Aguirre in the fourth quarter on their MSG Network telecast to rave about Curry's conditioning. It looked like a preemptive strike, knowing that a critical column on Curry being a no-show at the Las Vegas workouts was forthcoming. Aguirre said Curry is "way ahead of schedule.'' Actually when I spoke to Aguirre two weeks ago, he said Curry wouldn't start real serious conditioning until mid-July.

2. The statement from Curry's camp about how Isiah needs to figure out how this will work.

I'm hopeful after a full season of Isiah coaching Eddy Curry personally and Isiah knowing that he will have to deal with the consequences of how he sets up the team in the future because he personally will be coaching it(and can't just dump his team that fits together terribly on someone else) he is more mindful of how things
work.

I'm hopeful that Isiah is now selling other gm's instead of selling us knicks fans. I'm hoping that Curry is on his way out, and that Aquire is just covering.

Cash why would you assume Berman is being honest about anything?
He has showed in the past how biased he is and that makes his credibility nill.

Who is Currys camp? I didnt know Curry had a "camp" An unidentified quote from Berman? That carries no weight. In my opinion Berman just like Larry Brooks whenever he wants to say something he just makes up an imaginary unidentified source. I know the Post is a tabloid and Berman is far from a reporter but he couldnt get a job at the Star or the Globe with his nonsense.

Zach and Curry are friends off the court.

Why would a beat reporter risk his livelihood by completely fabricating stories? Especially concerning an organization that is as media conscious as the Knicks and who are more than willing to be vengeful towards people they think did them wrong?

You think being biased (funny how you don't mention reporters like Howard Beck, that are biased towards Isiah) ruins credibility? Fabricating stories completely destroys careers.

LOL, ask Latrell. Berman never proved whether the boat story was true. The post lawyers said that Sprewell and his people couldn't prove that someone told him that story or not, so Sprewell couldn't prove that he it was defamation of character with malicious intent. The Daily News and Times blasted him and the Post for not supporting the story. I am still waiting for support for that story but as he said I guess he doesn't need it to support it.

So what are you saying? That there was no evidence that Berman fabricated a story?

Thanks.

OK Isles let me ask you a question.

If Marc Berman writes something in the paper does that mean it is true? Yes or no?

I think it means that he believes it to be true when he writes it. Be it personal knowledge or from sources that he believes to be reliable.

I don't think he just makes crap up and prints it the way you do.

Really? so his opinions as a Columnist are facts? And our opinions are just made up?

Did you think Berman was telling the truth when he said "Curry, meanwhile, will enjoy New Orleans next February in the main event of All-Star weekend. Bank on it."

Oh damn hurry up and back track, lol.

[Edited by - COSSUCKS on 07-14-2007 12:11 AM]

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by Pharzeone:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by Cash:

Two things that I thought were interesting about this.

1.) From the Berman blog:

1. Was very amused that Knicks trotted out Mark Aguirre in the fourth quarter on their MSG Network telecast to rave about Curry's conditioning. It looked like a preemptive strike, knowing that a critical column on Curry being a no-show at the Las Vegas workouts was forthcoming. Aguirre said Curry is "way ahead of schedule.'' Actually when I spoke to Aguirre two weeks ago, he said Curry wouldn't start real serious conditioning until mid-July.

2. The statement from Curry's camp about how Isiah needs to figure out how this will work.

I'm hopeful after a full season of Isiah coaching Eddy Curry personally and Isiah knowing that he will have to deal with the consequences of how he sets up the team in the future because he personally will be coaching it(and can't just dump his team that fits together terribly on someone else) he is more mindful of how things
work.

I'm hopeful that Isiah is now selling other gm's instead of selling us knicks fans. I'm hoping that Curry is on his way out, and that Aquire is just covering.

Cash why would you assume Berman is being honest about anything?
He has showed in the past how biased he is and that makes his credibility nill.

Who is Currys camp? I didnt know Curry had a "camp" An unidentified quote from Berman? That carries no weight. In my opinion Berman just like Larry Brooks whenever he wants to say something he just makes up an imaginary unidentified source. I know the Post is a tabloid and Berman is far from a reporter but he couldnt get a job at the Star or the Globe with his nonsense.

Zach and Curry are friends off the court.

Why would a beat reporter risk his livelihood by completely fabricating stories? Especially concerning an organization that is as media conscious as the Knicks and who are more than willing to be vengeful towards people they think did them wrong?

You think being biased (funny how you don't mention reporters like Howard Beck, that are biased towards Isiah) ruins credibility? Fabricating stories completely destroys careers.

LOL, ask Latrell. Berman never proved whether the boat story was true. The post lawyers said that Sprewell and his people couldn't prove that someone told him that story or not, so Sprewell couldn't prove that he it was defamation of character with malicious intent. The Daily News and Times blasted him and the Post for not supporting the story. I am still waiting for support for that story but as he said I guess he doesn't need it to support it.

So what are you saying? That there was no evidence that Berman fabricated a story?

Thanks.

OK Isles let me ask you a question.

If Marc Berman writes something in the paper does that mean it is true? Yes or no?

I think it means that he believes it to be true when he writes it. Be it personal knowledge or from sources that he believes to be reliable.

I don't think he just makes crap up and prints it the way you do.

Really? so his opinions as a Columnist are facts? And our opinions are just made up?

Did you think Berman was telling the truth when he said "Curry, meanwhile, will enjoy New Orleans next February in the main event of All-Star weekend. Bank on it."

Oh damn hurry up and back track, lol.

[Edited by - COSSUCKS on 07-14-2007 12:11 AM]

Seriously, what the **** are you talking about? Are you really this obtuse? What you just quoted is obviously an opinion. Berman talking about what Aguirre said to him, and what you suggested was a fabrication, is not opinion.

I'm not even sure why you're going off on this tangent about fact or opinion. Go back to your premise that Berman intentionally fabricates stories. Offering his opinion every now and then is completely different. Where is your proof that he does?

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Your name calling in every post just shows your desparation.

By the way since imply the NY Post only prints the truth why did they pay the Ramseys millions of dollars to settle a libel suit?

Wow, now who's making stuff up? Talk about desperation.

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Posted by islesfan:

Posted by COSSUCKS:

Your name calling in every post just shows your desparation.

By the way since imply the NY Post only prints the truth why did they pay the Ramseys millions of dollars to settle a libel suit?

Wow, now who's making stuff up? Talk about desperation.

Oh the NY post did not pay millions to settle a libel lawsuit brought by the Ramseys? OK whatever you say.
After all newspaper writers never print things that are not true. Good call,lol. :)

And yet another example of how clueless you are.

I've never implied anything that you're now claiming that I did. Not even close but that's not stopping you from running with it.

Pathetic and it reeks of desperation.

Posted by islesfan:

Why would a beat reporter risk his livelihood by completely fabricating stories?