Posted by oohah:
I'll guess: Bob Cousey?
No!
In my brief research, Cousy played with only one Rookie of the Year: 1956-57 - Tom Heinsohn
***
Larry Brown seemingly prefers Jamal at point:
Or perhaps he prefers Marbury to Crawford at Shooting Guard?
is LB just a Steph-hater as well?
Maybe he is. But I doubt he would take the same stance as you regarding Marbury's relative rank amongst today's point guards.
they lost Joe Johnson in gm 1 agains Dallas. His fga's went up but so did Amare's.
Okay, makes sense...
In the end the shots still came from the player who gave them the best chance to win
I don't know what games you were watching, but the Dallas series was the Steve Nash show, with Nash taking and making most of the shots right down to the end. Against the Spurs, Stoudemire shot more down the stretch.
Allen Iverson .......24.2 - 7.9
Gilbert Arenas .....19.0 - 5.1
Baron Davis.........16.3 - 7.9
S. Marbury .........15.9 - 8.1
Mike Bibby .........15.8 - 6.8
Sam Cassell ........15.6 - 7.3 (03-04 since he was injured 04-05)
Jason Kidd ..........15.5 - 8.9 (02-03 his last healthy full season)
Kirk Hinrich ........14.5 - 6.4
Tony Parker ........13.9 - 6.1
Jeff McInnis ........12.0 - 5.1
Steve Nash .........11.4 - 11.5 (jumped to 17.9 shots in Playoffs)
With the exception of Arenas, the guys on that list (not counting AI cause he is a 2) still adhere to that one key principal. Marbury is the chief strayer from that underlying directive.
I would have to disagree. The first seven players on the list: Iverson, Arenas, Davis, Marbury, Bibby, Cassell, and Kidd all tend to take quite a few shots down the stretch. Nash too. In fact Kidd, Bibby, Nash, and Cassell are all well known for being 'clutch shooters', so they must be taking some shots at the end of the game, that is how you build that sort of reputation.
oohah
[Edited by - oohah on 10-25-2005 2:52 PM]
Thanks for looking it up. It was a throw out guess. Cousey did make those around him better.
INteresting debates and history.
Have to remember, Marbs as a Net Dissed the knicks many times. I don't think just cuz he gets traded here one should throw their undying love. Seems shallow. Just like we should not wish those departed ill just cuz they don't play for us.
Marbs reputation was not exactly the best and for the most part he is trying. He gets my benefit of the doubt, and my respect for his extreme talent, but the love he got to earn with wins, not stats.
To each his own.