[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Rebuilding around Melo...
Author Thread
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

1/21/2014  11:09 AM
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
I just refuse to kid myself into believing that we are better off without him.

That depends entirely on how his $21 mil salary is replaced. You make it sound like people want to waive him and replace him with an NBDL player.
look around the league. Use your brain. What happens if Melo walks? What is your plan to rebuild the roster? We are then a team with no impact players. So how are you replacing that? Tell me names. It sure seems to me your picking from a cheap FA pool (NBDL caliber guys) or your going to overpay for a guy who has more holes in his game and is lower impact than Melo anyway... guys like Jennings, Josh Smith, Al Jefferson... your looking at another extended period of 30 win seasons while you pine for an impact player to build around.

Bonn you make it sounds as simple as our impact player isnt good enough to win a title, so lets get a new one. It took this organization 10 years to accomplish that.

Fish, I completely think u are spoofing me the last few weeks with your posting..We never agree and now u are writing the exact things I would say..U got me, nice one...

AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/21/2014  11:15 AM
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
I just refuse to kid myself into believing that we are better off without him.

That depends entirely on how his $21 mil salary is replaced. You make it sound like people want to waive him and replace him with an NBDL player.
look around the league. Use your brain. What happens if Melo walks? What is your plan to rebuild the roster? We are then a team with no impact players. So how are you replacing that? Tell me names. It sure seems to me your picking from a cheap FA pool (NBDL caliber guys) or your going to overpay for a guy who has more holes in his game and is lower impact than Melo anyway... guys like Jennings, Josh Smith, Al Jefferson... your looking at another extended period of 30 win seasons while you pine for an impact player to build around.

Bonn you make it sounds as simple as our impact player isnt good enough to win a title, so lets get a new one. It took this organization 10 years to accomplish that.


Whether we keep Melo or not, we're many years away from being good - unless Melo stays here and is our 2b or 3rd option. But then you can't pay him close to 30 mil per.
I never said it would be easy. The bar is pretty low if all we have to do is be a .400 team to repeat this performance though.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/21/2014  11:17 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/21/2014  11:17 AM
Now if he walks, you're not going to be able to replace him with something valuable until a year later when we have cap room but I do think that 20 to 30 mil can be spent much better, and the bar is set pretty low to beat what we've accomplished over the past 4 years.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/21/2014  11:18 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/21/2014  11:19 AM
Fish I agree with you that Melo is a player we can keep and build a team around him properly this time around. This requires a GM with a plan in place, backup plans and a good coach who over comes injuries and has all 15 men ready at all times. You build around your stars. Cover their diffiencies. Surround them with a top notch PG, shooters, defenders, rebounders etc

But Fish are you ok with Maxing out Melo into his 30's $30mil per year. He leads the league in minutes played. We've seen this play out before. Do you want to see him in a suit on the bench for th remainder of his contract and another decade down the drain?

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/21/2014  11:24 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/21/2014  11:25 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
I just refuse to kid myself into believing that we are better off without him.

That depends entirely on how his $21 mil salary is replaced. You make it sound like people want to waive him and replace him with an NBDL player.
look around the league. Use your brain. What happens if Melo walks? What is your plan to rebuild the roster? We are then a team with no impact players. So how are you replacing that? Tell me names. It sure seems to me your picking from a cheap FA pool (NBDL caliber guys) or your going to overpay for a guy who has more holes in his game and is lower impact than Melo anyway... guys like Jennings, Josh Smith, Al Jefferson... your looking at another extended period of 30 win seasons while you pine for an impact player to build around.

Bonn you make it sounds as simple as our impact player isnt good enough to win a title, so lets get a new one. It took this organization 10 years to accomplish that.


Whether we keep Melo or not, we're many years away from being good - unless Melo stays here and is our 2b or 3rd option. But then you can't pay him close to 30 mil per.
I never said it would be easy. The bar is pretty low if all we have to do is be a .400 team to repeat this performance though.

people here in Atlanta used to say the same thing bonn " we can't lose Joe johnson, who are we going to get?" well they traded joe, for peanuts basically, no real impact players came in the trade, yet the hawks without horford right now are 21-19.

Can't predict the future, we have no idea who may become available, but I want to be in position to make moves.. we stink right now with carmelo.. so what is the big deal with losing him.. time for a culture change around here. can't make moves, or refuse to make moves out of fear..

as you said, it may not be easy, but building a good team is never really easy.. it takes work..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/21/2014  11:24 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:Now if he walks, you're not going to be able to replace him with something valuable until a year later when we have cap room but I do think that 20 to 30 mil can be spent much better, and the bar is set pretty low to beat what we've accomplished over the past 4 years.

I like the option of having $30mil to spend

Vs

A) Melo walking
B) paying Melo $30mil and seeing yet another knick finishing his career at the end of the bench in a suit for half a decade and then having to wait another decade to clear the mess AGAIN

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/21/2014  11:31 AM
gunsnewing wrote:Fish I agree with you that Melo is a player we can keep and build a team around him properly this time around. This requires a GM with a plan in place, backup plans and a good coach who over comes injuries and has all 15 men ready at all times. You build around your stars. Cover their diffiencies. Surround them with a top notch PG, shooters, defenders, rebounders etc

But Fish are you ok with Maxing out Melo into his 30's $30mil per year. He leads the league in minutes played. We've seen this play out before. Do you want to see him in a suit on the bench for th remainder of his contract and another decade down the drain?

guns, we agree a lot of the time, but this is the problem i have with this thinking, and it is not just you, that I heard this from..

I agree with you that Melo is a player we can keep and build a team around him properly this time around.

ok, so if you feel that way, there should be no problem paying him whatever.. the money should not be an issue.. would you have a problem paying a 30 year old durant or lebron, 30 mil a year? I don't think so, you would just pay them.. and why? because you feel you could build a winner.. so if you feel this way, the money should not be an issue...

You build around your stars. Cover their diffiencies. Surround them with a top notch PG, shooters, defenders, rebounders etc

in that case you are not building around a star... a top notch PG in most cases is going to be a star.. why not just get a top notch PG, and a group of good players who can defend, shoot and rebound?

But Fish are you ok with Maxing out Melo into his 30's $30mil per year. He leads the league in minutes played. We've seen this play out before.

again, what should that matter, if you agree that you can properly build around him, then go for it.. I guess it depends what you are trying to build guns? I hope you are alluding to building a real contender... if not then no need to keep carmelo, even at 15 mil a year.. just start over... go with a younger player with real two way potential..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/21/2014  11:34 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Now if he walks, you're not going to be able to replace him with something valuable until a year later when we have cap room but I do think that 20 to 30 mil can be spent much better, and the bar is set pretty low to beat what we've accomplished over the past 4 years.

I like the option of having $30mil to spend

Vs

A) Melo walking
B) paying Melo $30mil and seeing yet another knick finishing his career at the end of the bench in a suit for half a decade and then having to wait another decade to clear the mess AGAIN

Losing Melo for nothing means we still have $67,686,515.00 in salary.

The current NBA Salary Cap is $58,679,000.00.

We are still way over the cap. There is no $30mil to spend.

Only option is to trade him now.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/21/2014  11:41 AM
Durant is still young and hasn't showed signs of breaking down

Lebron is a freak of nature and he is on HGH

Jordan never broke down

Kobe is only breaking down now at 37

Melo is missing 10-20 games at in his 20s
He is leading the league in minutes
And his team sucks so he is working harder to score so we only lose by 30 and not 60

I don't want to max Melo at $30mil per

I want under 28yr old stars and I want draft picks. I want our own star. I'm tired of overpaying for players

fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/21/2014  11:41 AM
gunsnewing wrote:Fish I agree with you that Melo is a player we can keep and build a team around him properly this time around. This requires a GM with a plan in place, backup plans and a good coach who over comes injuries and has all 15 men ready at all times. You build around your stars. Cover their diffiencies. Surround them with a top notch PG, shooters, defenders, rebounders etc

But Fish are you ok with Maxing out Melo into his 30's $30mil per year. He leads the league in minutes played. We've seen this play out before. Do you want to see him in a suit on the bench for th remainder of his contract and another decade down the drain?

I think it would be one year he makes $30... whats the contract extension he's eligible for 5/$125? Thats what these guys cost. If you dont want to pay a star player fine, but look around the NBA. The teams that get hurt by money are the ones that overpay role players not stars.

Im pretty emotional and more than capable of my share of knee jerks. But after the Melo trade which I hated I settled down and watched. What I saw was that Melo was as flawed a player as I thought. He's also better then I thought. He's not a ball mover or much of a facilitator, but he is good enought to carry a team for extended periods. He's good enough to outplay any star in the league. He's good enough to never had played on a losing team in 11 years. If you watch you can see his impact. Even his bullheaded takes too many shots approach has its positive impact on the game.

holfresh, I try to call it like I see it. Ive blasted Melo in the past. Ive documented his poor postseason play as and terrible record and help him accountable. I didnt like the trade that got him here either, but if you watch the Knicks and be honest over the last couple years Melo is NOT the problem, and if he is PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE give me more problems like him.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

1/21/2014  11:42 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
TeamBall wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
dk7th wrote:i know the difference between winning and losing. i also know the difference between constructive behavior and destructive behavior. melo has been to the playoffs every year? BFD. he's made it past round 1 twice. think about that. melo was honest? BFD. he was greedy-- that part you left out. and how did he help his own cause or the knicks? dude is greedy and stupid, and that trumps honesty.

melo is a destructive loser-- a malignant narcissist-- and you think the knicks can build a winner around him.

clearly you dont... dude's been in the league 11 years and has never had a losing season. Garbage in garbage out.

Seems like the one year they set out to build a roster to compete they won 54 games and had JR and Tyson not completely sucked donkey dick against the Pacers we would have played the Heat in the conference finals.

So we replace veterans like Kidd and Sheed, guys who played at a very high level for stretches with Bargs and Beno and its the problem is Melo? Didnt we see what happens last year when Melo's supporting cast plays well?

Folks who claim to know basketball and claim to know what they are seeing have some funny opinions. For two months the entire backcourt on our roster shoots 35% but the problem is you cant build around Melo?

If we trade Melo we will still need exactly what we need now: more talented and consistent players. Only then we will be back to the David Lee, Gallo, Wilson Chandler days of winning 30 games and wondering if the #s these guys put up mean anything.

Melo wins games. You have to really phuck up a roster to play sub .500 ball when you have this guy on your team


Yet people using the eyeball test didn't realize how ****ed up the roster was until the results were obvious. Isn't that interesting?!

No, not really.

Well, it's interesting to people who want to learn about and better understand the game. New information is never interesting to those who don't want to learn though.

Even the doom-and-gloom crew aka the anti-Melo's(including you) predicted that we'd be above .500 and as a lower seed playoff team. The general consensus on the board before the season started was that we were NOT going to win 54 games again and at best, made lateral moves. I think you're mischaracterizing the sentiments of many on the board.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/21/2014  11:43 AM
NYKBocker wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Now if he walks, you're not going to be able to replace him with something valuable until a year later when we have cap room but I do think that 20 to 30 mil can be spent much better, and the bar is set pretty low to beat what we've accomplished over the past 4 years.

I like the option of having $30mil to spend

Vs

A) Melo walking
B) paying Melo $30mil and seeing yet another knick finishing his career at the end of the bench in a suit for half a decade and then having to wait another decade to clear the mess AGAIN

Losing Melo for nothing means we still have $67,686,515.00 in salary.

The current NBA Salary Cap is $58,679,000.00.

We are still way over the cap. There is no $30mil to spend.

Only option is to trade him now.

That's what I meant. I'm looking last 2015 when these bums are off the books and you cap space and picks from trading Tyson and melo

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/21/2014  11:45 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/21/2014  11:50 AM
5yrs $131mil I believe

I agree fish I see Melos impact too. This year made it more clear and he is the only one playin at an NBA level but I still think we should trade him. Let's draft our own stars and then sign free agents and make smart trades that don't mortage the future for inury riddled players and malcontents

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/21/2014  11:46 AM
holfresh wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
holfresh wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
holfresh wrote:It's time for this organization to start thinking about rebuilding around Melo..JVG said it last night...They have to entertain trade scenarios around Chandler, Shump, etc...We might have to take a second look at Lowry...

Havent we rebuilt around Melo already?

Why exactly would first place Toronto sell their starting PG that ship passed

We have little to rebuild around Melo we made a big commitment to Bargnani you know thats that. Jim Dolan said this is a championship team--a guy like that does not admit mistake EVER. He will have the company line as injuries and well be back next year or 7-8th seed this year or whatever. This is a bad team for a dozen years sans 1--get ready for the next decade.

Simply put, NO..We need to put the pieces in place and clear the dead weight for day Amare's contract expires...Lowry isn't staying in Toronto unless they pay him a fortune...Toronto will lose him for nothing...We didn't make any commitment to Bargs that goes beyond Amare's deal, so thats no issue...Dolan will resign Melo...We have a couple of years to find pieces that fit around him and the next guy...

Toronto is in first place and can pay Lowry the going price-they play the game to win right--so why would a first place team trade their starting PG for beans--they are not.. Remember cap space next year is limited throughout the league. It s the following year 25 teams have it. I have to say we did rebuild around Melo--did we not acquire Tyson Chandler and Felton then the next year Bargs? JR Smith? Weve rebuilt around him once--that is fact.

U can't say we rebuilt with Amare size contract on the cap ...Melo became the main piece because Amare couldn't go...First place Toronto was trying to trade him before...Toronto is not a destination for anyone except Landry Fields type..How many players have bolted Toronto the first chance they get..But doesn't have to be Lowry, but we do have to rebuild and Melo will be here..

No they retooled--theyve spent plenty of money and traded many pieces and picks since Melo's been here retooling. This time it will be much worse. We dont have much cap space if Melo did resign to the super max and 25 other teams have more cap space than we do in 2015.

RIP Crushalot😞
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

1/21/2014  11:46 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:Now if he walks, you're not going to be able to replace him with something valuable until a year later when we have cap room but I do think that 20 to 30 mil can be spent much better, and the bar is set pretty low to beat what we've accomplished over the past 4 years.

Good point.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

1/21/2014  11:48 AM
gunsnewing wrote:Durant is still young and hasn't showed signs of breaking down

Lebron is a freak of nature and he is on HGH

Jordan never broke down

Kobe is only breaking down now at 37

Melo is missing 10-20 games at in his 20s
He is leading the league in minutes
And his team sucks so he is working harder to score so we only lose by 30 and not 60

I don't want to max Melo at $30mil per

I want under 28yr old stars and I want draft picks. I want our own star. I'm tired of overpaying for players

That's bull and you know it. Melo has had to carry the load for his teams. Jordan, Kobe and Durant ALL had 1b's and in some cases 1c's to make the games easier for them. That's the reason why those guys have or are projected to play at a high level in their late 30's.

fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/21/2014  11:52 AM
I would rather pay Melo $25mm a year then split it between overpriced guys, which is what Gallo became. Melo has no cronic issues physically. The minutes are on the coaches and the roster depth.

I would have no problem if the Knicks took a different direction and traded him, but my gut feeling is they would totally hose that, as well as hose the draft picks or the player development.

I would rather watch us try to get some good players over the next couple of years then try to rebuild. I dont see MSG as being able to accomplish that.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/21/2014  11:53 AM
NardDogNation wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Durant is still young and hasn't showed signs of breaking down

Lebron is a freak of nature and he is on HGH

Jordan never broke down

Kobe is only breaking down now at 37

Melo is missing 10-20 games at in his 20s
He is leading the league in minutes
And his team sucks so he is working harder to score so we only lose by 30 and not 60

I don't want to max Melo at $30mil per

I want under 28yr old stars and I want draft picks. I want our own star. I'm tired of overpaying for players

That's bull and you know it. Melo has had to carry the load for his teams. Jordan, Kobe and Durant ALL had 1b's and in some cases 1c's to make the games easier for them. That's the reason why those guys have or are projected to play at a high level in their late 30's.

That's what I said. Melo is having to work harder here because the supporting class stinks and are always injured therefore Melo himself is breaking down faster

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/21/2014  11:54 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
holfresh wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
holfresh wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
holfresh wrote:It's time for this organization to start thinking about rebuilding around Melo..JVG said it last night...They have to entertain trade scenarios around Chandler, Shump, etc...We might have to take a second look at Lowry...

Havent we rebuilt around Melo already?

Why exactly would first place Toronto sell their starting PG that ship passed

We have little to rebuild around Melo we made a big commitment to Bargnani you know thats that. Jim Dolan said this is a championship team--a guy like that does not admit mistake EVER. He will have the company line as injuries and well be back next year or 7-8th seed this year or whatever. This is a bad team for a dozen years sans 1--get ready for the next decade.

Simply put, NO..We need to put the pieces in place and clear the dead weight for day Amare's contract expires...Lowry isn't staying in Toronto unless they pay him a fortune...Toronto will lose him for nothing...We didn't make any commitment to Bargs that goes beyond Amare's deal, so thats no issue...Dolan will resign Melo...We have a couple of years to find pieces that fit around him and the next guy...

Toronto is in first place and can pay Lowry the going price-they play the game to win right--so why would a first place team trade their starting PG for beans--they are not.. Remember cap space next year is limited throughout the league. It s the following year 25 teams have it. I have to say we did rebuild around Melo--did we not acquire Tyson Chandler and Felton then the next year Bargs? JR Smith? Weve rebuilt around him once--that is fact.

U can't say we rebuilt with Amare size contract on the cap ...Melo became the main piece because Amare couldn't go...First place Toronto was trying to trade him before...Toronto is not a destination for anyone except Landry Fields type..How many players have bolted Toronto the first chance they get..But doesn't have to be Lowry, but we do have to rebuild and Melo will be here..

No they retooled--theyve spent plenty of money and traded many pieces and picks since Melo's been here retooling. This time it will be much worse. We dont have much cap space if Melo did resign to the super max and 25 other teams have more cap space than we do in 2015.

Good point. We will be battling other teams for players with limited cap space and no picks to dangle

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/21/2014  11:54 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/21/2014  11:59 AM
fishmike wrote:I would rather pay Melo $25mm a year then split it between overpriced guys, which is what Gallo became. Melo has no cronic issues physically. The minutes are on the coaches and the roster depth.

I would have no problem if the Knicks took a different direction and traded him, but my gut feeling is they would totally hose that, as well as hose the draft picks or the player development.

I would rather watch us try to get some good players over the next couple of years then try to rebuild. I dont see MSG as being able to accomplish that.

so what you are saying is you rather overpay melo and lose than over pay gallo and another player and win... I mean lets face it, they are all overpaid.... kind of odd why you picked gallo, dude is on a winning team...

you wouldn't overpay gallo and lawson instead?

iggy and David lee?

I mean I can keep going on and on.. not sure why you singled out gallo, but whatever.. LOL

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Rebuilding around Melo...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy