sidsanders wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:I can't believe some of you guys. You cry like lovesick schoolboys when Gallinari gets traded and then you cry over some low first-round pick when we get a better version of Gallinari back. The only real issue is the salary. But you can argue that it was already dead money since it was being invested in Novak and Camby.

No 1 cares about the salary at all, no 1 cares about the players either, we care that are GM's treats Draft picks like they are worthless. You know what we could of done with those 3 picks next year with Amares expiring contract. Im speechless really how did they get bent over so bad to add a 3rd pick. Its unbelievable they were going to amnesty him. We should of told them u take 1 pick or we walk away.

I care about salary because we cared about salary when it came to Lin and a year later we take on more salary after being a Tax Paying team?...Just goes to show how personal it was with Lin.

Oh and Bargs has a trade kicker, so we'll be paying $11.3mil not $11mil. This trade gets worse by the millisecond.

So what 11.3 or 11 im not paying his contract I could care less. No matter what we are over the apron. The money is actually a benefit for the Knicks because they clear Novak on the 2015-16 year. The problem is giving up draft picks. I think we could of dealt Amare possibly at the deadline with those picks for a much much better player or at least over the 2014-15 summer. The Knicks still arent better then Brooklyn,Indian,Chicago,Miami and we pissed away 3 more assets

There really is no financial benefit when you're paying butt loads in extra Tax Dollars and Bargs contract is $7.5mil richer in value than what we gave up assuming Raps buyout Camby in his last year. We're going to get crushed with the repeater rates. Novak's 2015-2016 salary is inconsequential.

Again what do u care if he is paying repeater rates and Tax dollars Im glad he is because he is ruining the franchise maybe he will sell it. Novaks deal is not inconsequential at all thats 4 million more dollars we can spend on a better player then Novak. There are plenty of players making 4 million that are 10 times better then Novak

It's inconsequential in an expiring yr when there is no other money on the books. He could be deal at draft time that yr gimmie a break. $3.75mil is not a lot salary for 1 season.

agree, not seeing 4 mill as a big deal when possibly 70+ mill comes off that year. what about feltons PO for that year (think its a player option)? does he need to go to save 2015 $?

Bargnani is 7 feet tall.

Chandler????
Bargnani
Melo
Shump
Felton

Not bad.

loweyecue wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:I can't believe some of you guys. You cry like lovesick schoolboys when Gallinari gets traded and then you cry over some low first-round pick when we get a better version of Gallinari back. The only real issue is the salary. But you can argue that it was already dead money since it was being invested in Novak and Camby.

No 1 cares about the salary at all, no 1 cares about the players either, we care that are GM's treats Draft picks like they are worthless. You know what we could of done with those 3 picks next year with Amares expiring contract. Im speechless really how did they get bent over so bad to add a 3rd pick. Its unbelievable they were going to amnesty him. We should of told them u take 1 pick or we walk away.

I care about salary because we cared about salary when it came to Lin and a year later we take on more salary after being a Tax Paying team?...Just goes to show how personal it was with Lin.

Oh and Bargs has a trade kicker, so we'll be paying $11.3mil not $11mil. This trade gets worse by the millisecond.

So what 11.3 or 11 im not paying his contract I could care less. No matter what we are over the apron. The money is actually a benefit for the Knicks because they clear Novak on the 2015-16 year. The problem is giving up draft picks. I think we could of dealt Amare possibly at the deadline with those picks for a much much better player or at least over the 2014-15 summer. The Knicks still arent better then Brooklyn,Indian,Chicago,Miami and we pissed away 3 more assets

There really is no financial benefit when you're paying butt loads in extra Tax Dollars and Bargs contract is $7.5mil richer in value than what we gave up assuming Raps buyout Camby in his last year. We're going to get crushed with the repeater rates. Novak's 2015-2016 salary is inconsequential.

Again what do u care if he is paying repeater rates and Tax dollars Im glad he is because he is ruining the franchise maybe he will sell it. Novaks deal is not inconsequential at all thats 4 million more dollars we can spend on a better player then Novak. There are plenty of players making 4 million that are 10 times better then Novak

That's one way to look at it. The other way is that there are plenty of players making half of what Bargnani makes that are 10 times better than him.

Yes and if his deal was longer then 2 years no way Id want him but with all are money locked into those 2 years it doesnt matter see how that works right

AnubisADL wrote:I hate trading picks but when the Knicks draft guys like Hardaway JR. Then maybe they should trade the pick.

Bargnani is 7 feet tall.

Chandler????
Bargnani
Melo
Shump
Felton

Not bad.

Still need to upgrade PG

BigDaddyG wrote:I can't believe some of you guys. You cry like lovesick schoolboys when Gallinari gets traded and then you cry over some low first-round pick when we get a better version of Gallinari back. The only real issue is the salary. But you can argue that it was already dead money since it was being invested in Novak and Camby.

Because any advanced stats (and the eye test) will tell you that Gallo is a much better player than Barg. Sorry, nothing to cheer about. That guy has always sucked and the NY media will eat him alive.

fishmike wrote:http://instagram.com/p/bNIKGzvXdC/

lol who's IG is this?

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

sidsanders wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

3G4G wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:I can't believe some of you guys. You cry like lovesick schoolboys when Gallinari gets traded and then you cry over some low first-round pick when we get a better version of Gallinari back. The only real issue is the salary. But you can argue that it was already dead money since it was being invested in Novak and Camby.

No 1 cares about the salary at all, no 1 cares about the players either, we care that are GM's treats Draft picks like they are worthless. You know what we could of done with those 3 picks next year with Amares expiring contract. Im speechless really how did they get bent over so bad to add a 3rd pick. Its unbelievable they were going to amnesty him. We should of told them u take 1 pick or we walk away.

I care about salary because we cared about salary when it came to Lin and a year later we take on more salary after being a Tax Paying team?...Just goes to show how personal it was with Lin.

Oh and Bargs has a trade kicker, so we'll be paying $11.3mil not $11mil. This trade gets worse by the millisecond.

So what 11.3 or 11 im not paying his contract I could care less. No matter what we are over the apron. The money is actually a benefit for the Knicks because they clear Novak on the 2015-16 year. The problem is giving up draft picks. I think we could of dealt Amare possibly at the deadline with those picks for a much much better player or at least over the 2014-15 summer. The Knicks still arent better then Brooklyn,Indian,Chicago,Miami and we pissed away 3 more assets

There really is no financial benefit when you're paying butt loads in extra Tax Dollars and Bargs contract is $7.5mil richer in value than what we gave up assuming Raps buyout Camby in his last year. We're going to get crushed with the repeater rates. Novak's 2015-2016 salary is inconsequential.

Again what do u care if he is paying repeater rates and Tax dollars Im glad he is because he is ruining the franchise maybe he will sell it. Novaks deal is not inconsequential at all thats 4 million more dollars we can spend on a better player then Novak. There are plenty of players making 4 million that are 10 times better then Novak

It's inconsequential in an expiring yr when there is no other money on the books. He could be deal at draft time that yr gimmie a break. $3.75mil is not a lot salary for 1 season.

agree, not seeing 4 mill as a big deal when possibly 70+ mill comes off that year. what about feltons PO for that year (think its a player option)? does he need to go to save 2015 $?

Your acting like Novak is worth the money he isnt so get rid of him.No reason to have him on the books for another year. That 4 million is the difference between 3 max deals

Start naming the 3 players we hand out Max Contracts to that season and then how we fill up the other 9 roster spots. That may have been the most ridiculous reply I've seen yet on this board.

Novak's salary in 2015-2016 is inconsequential....absolute fact when looking at this crap deal.

Bargnani > Novak

Camby didnt play all season.

We basically got a better Danilo Gallinari back...