knicks1248 wrote:I was thinking about a

Chandler/Novak
FOR
Omer Asik/SnT arron brooks

I think Novak is perfect for their system, played very well with lin and so did chandler..

Bonn1997 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:I was thinking about a

Chandler/Novak
FOR
Omer Asik/SnT arron brooks

I think Novak is perfect for their system, played very well with lin and so did chandler..

Houston has a lot of cap space. They're not gonna use it up on Tyson. They really need a PF too.

Tyson leadership alone compensates for his extra $ and I think it's a much better option then that clown DH..They have a young team with no real leader..I think it makes perfect sense for both teams.

Asik is not a paint clogger like tyson and with novak as another shooter to there already loaded guns, Houston would benefit more in that area..

yellowboy90 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:I was thinking about a

Chandler/Novak
FOR
Omer Asik/SnT arron brooks

I think Novak is perfect for their system, played very well with lin and so did chandler..

Houston has a lot of cap space. They're not gonna use it up on Tyson. They really need a PF too.

Tyson leadership alone compensates for his extra $ and I think it's a much better option then that clown DH..They have a young team with no real leader..I think it makes perfect sense for both teams.

Asik is not a paint clogger like tyson and with novak as another shooter to there already loaded guns, Houston would benefit more in that area..

The only way fhe knicks get asik is if Howard goes to H-town and the want to shave some cap space so they get involved in a 3way trade taking back non guaranteed contracts.

I am surprised that they would give Howard money and not Tyson considering Tyson is better than Howard.

yellowboy90 wrote:

knickscity wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:I was thinking about a

Chandler/Novak
FOR
Omer Asik/SnT arron brooks

I think Novak is perfect for their system, played very well with lin and so did chandler..

Houston has a lot of cap space. They're not gonna use it up on Tyson. They really need a PF too.

Tyson leadership alone compensates for his extra $ and I think it's a much better option then that clown DH..They have a young team with no real leader..I think it makes perfect sense for both teams.

Asik is not a paint clogger like tyson and with novak as another shooter to there already loaded guns, Houston would benefit more in that area..

The only way fhe knicks get asik is if Howard goes to H-town and the want to shave some cap space so they get involved in a 3way trade taking back non guaranteed contracts.

I am surprised that they would give Howard money and not Tyson considering Tyson is better than Howard.

What is Tyson better than Dwight at?

read some of the earlier Tyson vs Howard threads.

it was your comment so i figured i'd ask you.

yellowboy90 wrote:

knickscity wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:

knickscity wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:I was thinking about a

Chandler/Novak
FOR
Omer Asik/SnT arron brooks

I think Novak is perfect for their system, played very well with lin and so did chandler..

Houston has a lot of cap space. They're not gonna use it up on Tyson. They really need a PF too.

Tyson leadership alone compensates for his extra $ and I think it's a much better option then that clown DH..They have a young team with no real leader..I think it makes perfect sense for both teams.

Asik is not a paint clogger like tyson and with novak as another shooter to there already loaded guns, Houston would benefit more in that area..

The only way fhe knicks get asik is if Howard goes to H-town and the want to shave some cap space so they get involved in a 3way trade taking back non guaranteed contracts.

I am surprised that they would give Howard money and not Tyson considering Tyson is better than Howard.

What is Tyson better than Dwight at?

read some of the earlier Tyson vs Howard threads.

it was your comment so i figured i'd ask you.

I was being facetious. Howard, imo, is better than Tyson but some think Tyson was better than Dwight.