Posted by djsunyc:
after another regime change, it looks like going all out for a title team doesn't seem to be the #1 priority for the franchise. there's nothing wrong with that. if you're an owner of a team, you want to see your team in the press, make money, fill seats, and sell merchandise. the knicks will do that. hiring d'alsh will help achieve that. there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
but for those fans that really want to see them go after it...try to start building towards a title, these past few days may get them down.
the team will be better. the team will play better. there will be more excitement. at some point, they will achieve their goal of getting back to the playoffs. but would that be the ceiling or will that just be another rung in the ladder? imho, i think playoffs is the only goal at the moment and anything after that will take pure luck.
[Edited by - djsunyc on 06-29-2008 12:35 PM]
Hey man, I respect your opinion a lot, but I don't think we can say, based on Walshtoni's limited body of work here, that winning a title is not a long-term goal; and I don't think that desiring a more profitable, marketable team and desiring a championship has to be mutually exclusive. You are right that winning a chip will require a lot of luck. The truth is, that is the case for all teams, all sports.
Championship squads result from the perfect convergence of hard work, opportunity and luck. The Celts got lucky that everything fell into place for them to go all in. The Spurs lucked out they won the Duncan sweepstakes. The Lakers lucked out on gambling a big vet (Vlade) for a then unproven 18 year old high school kid (Bryant). The Heat got lucky that the teams ahead of them passed on Wade and they were even more lucky that Shaq and Kobe couldn't get along. The Pistons got lucky that Ainge was there to help them get Rasheed. The Bulls got lucky that Portland selected Sam Bowie. The list goes on and on. Every team works hard to put themselves in position to capitalized on opportunity, but once you get there -- you need that extra bit of luck.
I don't see any indications that Knicks brass are foregoing true contention for pure marketability. They picked a guy that got unanimously booed by the home crowd. They picked a guy that is supposedly a project. Walshtoni even admits he's a project. The Knicks were actively shopping for another lottery pick. That doesn't sound like a team with short-term goals to me. If the Knicks only concern was winning short term, our pick would have been better used in a trade for a proven vet. The Knicks are trying to trade their best young asset (Lee) for what?? Not a vet. They are trying to trade Lee to get a lottery pick or another young player that plays a position of need.
Sure, hiring a big splash coach indicates a desire to sell some tickets and play an entertaining brand of bball. Every other move indicates the Knicks are being patient and planning for the future. Not one move of the current regime has done anything to hurt our future. In fact, drafting DG just solidified another year of struggle; another lottery pick. As long as DG eventually pans out, and the next lotto pick does the same -- the Knicks will be poised to make that next step. We all have to realize that we're talking about two more seasons of struggle; and we are counting on some luck along the way (just like 29 other teams).
With that said, if Walshtoni start making some win-now moves -- I'll take this all back. I just don't think we can say any recent moves, outside of hiring D'Antoni, suggest that the Knicks will be anything but patient in the rebuilding process. As far as selling tickets goes, at this point, after the last few seasons, I'm pretty sure Dolan is convinced that it doesn't matter what type of product is out there -- MSG will always be a hot ticket, maybe he's finally given the green light on the rebuild.
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo