[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Choosing JYD to waive is dumb! (IT'S OFFICIAL)
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/15/2005  2:53 PM
Hey, Isles, what if they wanted to keep Jackie Butler? How would waiving Shandon make sense then?
yes. Because your paying them both anyway. By using the rule on Shandon you save more $$$ because his deal is bigger. So you just cut JYD, and amnesty Shandon and you save about $1.5mm

Its not my money, but $1.5mm is $1.5mm
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/15/2005  2:53 PM
Posted by simrud:

Rose did nothing to help SA. He was the weakest part of their rotation. Their achilles hill if you will.


I remember back in 99 I was extatic every time he came into the game because it meant somthing good for the Knicks every time he touched the ball.

Why do you think they gave up 2 1st round picks to get rid of him if he was so good.


With all the players the Knicks have the contract is the main thing that scares people off. They're almost uniformly overpaid. If Malik was free, if Mo T was free, they'd sign with teams and get PT.
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
8/15/2005  2:53 PM
Posted by simrud:

Rose did nothing to help SA. He was the weakest part of their rotation. Their achilles hill if you will.


I remember back in 99 I was extatic every time he came into the game because it meant somthing good for the Knicks every time he touched the ball.

Why do you think they gave up 2 1st round picks to get rid of him if he was so good.


Well I think Pop realized that the Spurs were going to have trouble winning another championship without a legit starting center next too Tim Duncan and that Rasho NESTERRRRRAVIC (couldn't resist the Stephen A way of saying it) wasn't going to cut it.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/15/2005  2:54 PM
not for nothing, but allan better play 70 games this season - that's all i'm saying.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/15/2005  2:54 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Hey, Isles, what if they wanted to keep Jackie Butler? How would waiving Shandon make sense then?
yes. Because your paying them both anyway. By using the rule on Shandon you save more $$$ because his deal is bigger. So you just cut JYD, and amnesty Shandon and you save about $1.5mm

Its not my money, but $1.5mm is $1.5mm

Where does the roster space to keep Jackie come from?


¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/15/2005  2:55 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

not for nothing, but allan better play 70 games this season - that's all i'm saying.


that would be a certified disaster. I'll think Larry will make a sincere pitch to Allan to retire and work with the team in some capacity after seeing him hobble in training camp.
¿ △ ?
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/15/2005  2:55 PM
In case you did not get it back in school, that quoate was meant to make people feel better. There were plenty of things to fear during the great depression. Roosvelet realized the problems he was just trying to fire up the nation.

We don't need to be fired up to be Knick fans, we can handle the truth very well. And the truth is that waiving JYD could be the start of more ****ty moves.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/15/2005  2:56 PM
OH MY GOD...SOMEONE THAT ACTUALLY HAS A MEMORY OF LAST YEAR.
Posted by crzymdups:

Guys, I have to say I'm moving into the tomverve camp on this one.

...

People seem to forget that the 2-18 stretch included a long stretch where JYD was starting. It wasn't pretty.
[Edited by - crzymdups on 08-15-2005 2:38 PM]


all kool aid all the time.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/15/2005  2:57 PM
Posted by simrud:

Stats don't tell the story when comparing JYD and Taylor.

Taylor is a lazy out of shape no defense dog. JYD is an energy player who provides a spark of the bench. Taylor type players destroy teams, JYD type players make them.

Taylor only contributes on offense where we already have plenty, and if swill post anybody it should be Sweetney first, Q second, and JJ thrid. JYD was our only defensive stopper.


yeah but JYD wasn't going to play on this team. He barely played last year and this year we added James, frye & lee. That is the only reason I'm brushing this move aside. Its not a big deal. I just hope the team realizes they need a real frontcourt player not malik rose for 35mins after Frye struggles early on and sweetney and james are in foul trouble
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/15/2005  2:57 PM
yes... RV thats great. Hell, I'm going to apply that to my whole life. Thanks to FDR's great words I can now have great confidence that
a) Isiah will remake the Knicks into a great team (before I die)
b) my friends will come home from Iraq and see thier babies again
c) the lady on her cell phone in the minivan behind me wont smash into my car because she's distracted by a red sign that says "SALE"

Good old FDR
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/15/2005  2:59 PM
Fish...I gotta say this...what in the hell has happened to you...when I joined the board, your sig said Kool Aid...now you deride every marginal move as the end of the world...what has changed...you've gotten...Crazy.
all kool aid all the time.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/15/2005  3:00 PM
So its JYD fault we went 2-18? I mean blamin the least importantp layer in the startin five and not even the most important player when of bench makes all the sense in the world I guess.

We should have traded Marbury long ago by that logic. He went 2-18 while playint he most minutes, it must be his fault!
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
8/15/2005  3:00 PM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by rvhoss:

Why did taylor have better stats than JYD? Just answer that question and I'll go to another argument...if taylor sucks, JYD shouldn't be in the league.

JYD's game high rebounds with knicks = 11, MoT's high rebounds with knicks = 10
Mot's game high points with knicks = 19, JYD's high points with knicks = 15

we already know the averages.

What exactly do we need JYD for again? (that we don't already have btw)
Posted by simrud:

Taylor sucks and he should have been waived or better yet never traded for. He should never get any play in time over Sweetney or Frye or Rose. Which puts 4 bigs in front of him including James.

JYD we could have actually traed at some point. Taylor is unfreakin movable.

Idiots who liked the Mo Taylor trade manup!!!



JYD could have been a situational player- guarding a Dirk or KG out on the perimeter

He can play 10 mins and be effective.

Other players (Lazy Marbs, Q & Craw) could be see JYD go at it and pick up there games.

What does rose give us?

The best post defense against midgets in the NBA.



I completely agree with that. JYD's effectiveness is not seen on the stat sheet but he was not going to get any playing time this year so this move is not the end of the world. It gives Lee & Ariza more minutes and both guys are more part of the future than rose, taylor and jyd
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/15/2005  3:01 PM
Posted by rvhoss:

Fish...I gotta say this...what in the hell has happened to you...when I joined the board, your sig said Kool Aid...now you deride every marginal move as the end of the world...what has changed...you've gotten...Crazy.
when the season starts it will go back to koolaid. I love the Knicks and when they play I root for every guy. It would just be nice to root for better players for once.


"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/15/2005  3:02 PM
Lets make this as long as the "Idios who liked the Mo Taylor trade manup!!!" thread LOL.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/15/2005  3:03 PM
again, waiving jyd makes sense if the following happen:

1. h20 retires
2. malik gets traded before the season starts

otherwise, i'm not sure what the rationale was.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
8/15/2005  3:03 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by franco12:

for everyone saying Lee is able to replace JYD, Lee is a rookie and might not get it

Rose is a freagin midget and his rings don't mean anything except that he was playing alongside Tim Duncan.

I'm betting JYD ends up in miami!

There's no doubt that there's a market for JYD now that nobody has to pay him his contract, besides the Knicks. I'd bet that he's scooped up by a contender real quick. Contenders are always looking for athletic guys who hustle, plays defense and is a team player.


You can say the same thing for Malik Rose...


Except that he was sitting on a major contenders bench all last year and was then traded away.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/15/2005  3:03 PM
and JYD did WHAT for us last year?

Keeping in mind when he started we were 2 and 8.
and when he didn't start, we only won 31 games.

I repeat, Rose guarded shaq on his way to a ring, JYD has done what exactly in his career?

Posted by simrud:

he did nothign for us last year other then puttin up meaningless numbers in a couple of meannigless games.


all kool aid all the time.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/15/2005  3:04 PM
If Rose does get traded I would agree with you. But who in the world is takin on his salary?

I cringe at the thought of player we'd get back and his contract length.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
8/15/2005  3:05 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Hey, Isles, what if they wanted to keep Jackie Butler? How would waiving Shandon make sense then?
yes. Because your paying them both anyway. By using the rule on Shandon you save more $$$ because his deal is bigger. So you just cut JYD, and amnesty Shandon and you save about $1.5mm

Its not my money, but $1.5mm is $1.5mm


What Fish said.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Choosing JYD to waive is dumb! (IT'S OFFICIAL)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy