[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If Frye Granger and Graham are gone by 8 who do you pick?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/23/2005  8:03 PM
of course you know who i would pick, so i wont rehash that--but lets hear the opinions!

let say for example
1 Bogut
2 D Williams
3 M Williams
4 Green
5 Granger
6 Frye
7 Graham


lets use this model--of course anything can happen in a draft and guys can slip--where do we go in this scenario?
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/23/2005  8:06 PM
Bynum or Webster
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
6/23/2005  8:08 PM
Bynum for sure.

our target players should be:

Frye, Taft, Bynum, Bogut, big......I am sorry but I hate the fact that we don't have a center...
The true Knickabocker..........
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/23/2005  8:09 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Bynum or Webster

agreed and if bynum and webster are gone than Wright then Villanueva, then taft
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
6/23/2005  8:11 PM
Villanueva and Taft? Hooray, two more guys who look like the next Tim Thomas. No thanks.

Take the best player available, a guy named Chris Paul.

Of course this wouldn't happen. Why would Utah take a PF/C when they have a PF and a C locked up in long term deals? Why would New Orleans take another 2 when they took one last year? This doesn't make much sense.
#Knickstaps
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/23/2005  8:24 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

Villanueva and Taft? Hooray, two more guys who look like the next Tim Thomas. No thanks.

Take the best player available, a guy named Chris Paul.

Of course this wouldn't happen. Why would Utah take a PF/C when they have a PF and a C locked up in long term deals? Why would New Orleans take another 2 when they took one last year? This doesn't make much sense.

i just put7 guys in the slots, basically making the point they were off the board
RIP Crushalot😞
VDesai
Posts: 42823
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
6/23/2005  8:30 PM
Definitely Bynum or Webster. I really wanted Webster but his spot seems to be duplicated by QRich.
KNICKSdom
Posts: 20799
Alba Posts: 8
Joined: 1/17/2004
Member: #545
USA
6/23/2005  8:32 PM
Next is Andrew Bynum. There is no doubt.
Knicks are happening and have a Unicorn.
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
6/23/2005  8:41 PM
Sean May of course

Seriously though, we should definitely go with Bynum.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
SKY
Posts: 20356
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2004
Member: #687
USA
6/23/2005  8:50 PM
Bynum, Paul, Felton

If we're picking a PG, see if we culd swing a deal for a C.
If not, move Marbury to SG. Craw as 6th man.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
6/23/2005  9:03 PM
I want Bynum more than Frye, Granger, or Graham.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/23/2005  9:13 PM
What? Where's Chris Paul? He's a lock to go top 5. This is an unrealistic projection.
¿ △ ?
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/23/2005  9:15 PM
Posted by KNICKSdom:

Next is Andrew Bynum. There is no doubt.
There is absolutely no doubt. Granger is the only player i would take ahead of him. I understand Frye as a pick but if the knics have Frye and Bynum ranked 2 and 3 respectively, I'd take Bynum, he's bigger, younger , and his potential is much higher. I'd also sign S Hunter with some of the MLE or Jerome James.
rain
Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353
USA
6/23/2005  10:23 PM
Trade down with LA, take Bynum... with agreement that they will Paul.

[Edited by - rain on 06/23/2005 22:24:15]
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/23/2005  11:39 PM
Andrew or Ike.. tough call. Either is a win win for me
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/24/2005  12:15 AM
this is actually a covert anti-Frye thread by the way:>)
RIP Crushalot😞
sbensol74
Posts: 20331
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/12/2004
Member: #795
USA
6/24/2005  12:26 AM
is there any chance frye wont be there for us to blow the draft with?
clydesofly.com
metra
Posts: 20743
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/11/2003
Member: #473
6/24/2005  12:37 AM
Frye's not bad, but he's not the solution. Camby needed Ewing and Frye needs a big. Since we can't get any proven bigs (maybe Fran V) let's just go to Granger or Graham. Either of those players would make me happy. Especially Graham though, to make up for our lack of D in Q, Craw and Marbs.
daddynel
Posts: 21222
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 12/2/2003
Member: #505
6/24/2005  12:39 AM
1. granger
2. frye
3. graham
IF that's all that's available.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/24/2005  12:40 AM
Posted by VDesai:

Definitely Bynum or Webster. I really wanted Webster but his spot seems to be duplicated by QRich.

exactly we need a 2-way player more than ever and Ariza is not the answer
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
If Frye Granger and Graham are gone by 8 who do you pick?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy