[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

2/11 Insider Trade Block
Author Thread
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
2/11/2005  10:58 AM
Most was about Utah willing to listen to offers for Boozer. A small bit on the Knicks.

The Rockets are trying hard to move either Maurice Taylor or Juwan Howard, two players they feel are too much alike, league sources told Insider. Ideally, they'd like to get a mobile, shot-blocking, rebounding big man in the mode of Kelvin Cato.

Until he was traded to the Magic last summer Cato – for all of his faults – was able to protect Yao Ming on the defensive end. Howard – who arrived from the Magic as part of the Francis-Tracy McGrady summer blockbuster – and Taylor aren't.

The Rockets have talked to a number of teams about deals. The most serious appears to be with the Knicks. The Rockets have been trying to pry Kurt Thomas out of New York. According to source, the Knicks are only willing to give up Jerome Williams at this point.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/11/2005  11:01 AM
Posted by Andrew:

Most was about Utah willing to listen to offers for Boozer. A small bit on the Knicks.

The Rockets are trying hard to move either Maurice Taylor or Juwan Howard, two players they feel are too much alike, league sources told Insider. Ideally, they'd like to get a mobile, shot-blocking, rebounding big man in the mode of Kelvin Cato.

Until he was traded to the Magic last summer Cato – for all of his faults – was able to protect Yao Ming on the defensive end. Howard – who arrived from the Magic as part of the Francis-Tracy McGrady summer blockbuster – and Taylor aren't.

The Rockets have talked to a number of teams about deals. The most serious appears to be with the Knicks. The Rockets have been trying to pry Kurt Thomas out of New York. According to source, the Knicks are only willing to give up Jerome Williams at this point.

No, we should be trying to trade Kurt, not Jerome Williams!
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
2/11/2005  11:03 AM
KT for Spoon and a #1 pick. Spoon expires after next year.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
2/11/2005  11:04 AM
...and Spoon could help Sweetney by eating up all the food before Sweets gets to the table.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
Nalod
Posts: 71376
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/11/2005  11:07 AM
Posted by Andrew:

...and Spoon could help Sweetney by eating up all the food before Sweets gets to the table.

Ahhhhhhh!
Nalod
Posts: 71376
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/11/2005  11:14 AM
Actually, JYD is not needed here. Lets face it, we are not trying to win, we are developing. TT is untradable, but JYD brings alot to the table, and a team making a playoff run could use him.

But we don't need Mo Taylor, and we don't need Juwan Howard. I'd rather keep KT. Mo is not going to get better, and KT is better than Juwan.

Don't get me wrong, I really like JYD and his game! ANd I don't see the Rockets giving anyting up we can use except MO and JUwan, so I would not see moving JYD, but it should be considered. WE ain't winning anything with JYD in the near future anyway!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/11/2005  11:15 AM
Posted by Andrew:

KT for Spoon and a #1 pick. Spoon expires after next year.

Houston does not have the ability to trade their pick because they dealt their 2004 one away.
RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/11/2005  11:15 AM
Sorry... gotta do better than Spoon for KT. While I sit in the front row on the trade KT band wagon the guy is a decent player and works his ass off every minute he's on the court.

If its Spoon it has to be this year's and 2007 #1 picks. you MUST get 2 #1s if your dealing KT for Spoon. Face it... we would release him anyway which means your paying abouy $7mm for a couple #1s in the late teens early 20s range. Not a great deal.

Hou will need to get another team involved
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/11/2005  11:21 AM
I think if Tor is serious about building around Bosh we have a very good chance of getting their #1 this offseason. The might squeek into the playoffs. If they dont their pick will be 10-13. If you offer then TT and $3mm for Rose and their #1 it gives them max cap space at the end of the year allowing them to sign or trade for a max level player before Bosh is due for an extension. It also saves them about $18mm in costs. I think thats pretty realistic for both teams. If not this offseason then next years deadline (and their 06 #1) is also an option.

Opportunities like that are why I dont want to use TT/Penny and take back huge salaries of over the hill type players this offseason.

If we get nothing done with them next year let their $30mm just walk off into the sunset
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
2/11/2005  11:21 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:

Houston does not have the ability to trade their pick because they dealt their 2004 one away.

Darn....where is the Houston pick going to? Orlando?
PURE KNICKS LOVE
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
2/11/2005  11:23 AM
Wait...Briggs. I think the rule is you can't trade 2 future picks in consecutive years.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/11/2005  11:26 AM
no... the rule is you must draft a player in the first round every other year. So if they traded last years pick they must draft a player this year. They can than trade that player, but they cant trade the pick.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
NYKBocker
Posts: 38420
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
2/11/2005  11:32 AM
Does that include draft day trades? A loop hole would be a hand shake deal and pick player the other team wants then send to them afterwards.
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
2/11/2005  11:32 AM
fish...thats not correct.

In addition, teams are restricted from trading away future first round draft picks in consecutive years. This is called the "Ted Stepien Rule." Stepien owned the Cavs from 1980-83, and made a series of bad trades that cost the Cavs several years' first round picks. The trades, as columnist Chris Young put it, "amounted to giving up Manhattan for a bag of beads." As a result of Stepien's ineptitude, teams are now prevented from making trades which might leave them without a future first-round draft pick in consecutive years.

This rule applies only to future first round picks. For example, if this is the 99-00 season, then teams can trade their 2000 first round pick without regard to whether they had a 1999 pick, since their 1999 pick is no longer a future pick. But they can't trade away both their 2000 and 2001 picks, since both are future picks. Teams sometimes work around this rule by trading first round picks in alternate years.

In addition, teams are required to have only a first round pick, and not necessarily their first round pick. So teams may trade away their own future picks in consecutive years if they have another team's first round pick in one of those years.


http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#70
PURE KNICKS LOVE
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/11/2005  11:36 AM
damn, my man andrew did some research.

you see andrew, that's why i kept telling you to get that G.E.D. :)

that's good to read. as for the spoon and a #1 for kurt. i proposed that a few weeks ago, and i LOVE that trade. yes, spoon is 1/2 the player kurt is, but we are still getting that #1, opening the spot for sweetney AND spoon is expiring next season. so instead of $40 expiring, we now have $46. which means, we don't have to trade nazr in some sort of money deal, we have spoon to move instead.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/11/2005  11:59 AM
KT & HOU's 2nd rounder for Mo Taylor & HOU's 1st rounder?

say no to Juwan Howard...we don't need that contract on our books.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/11/2005  12:12 PM
Posted by Andrew:

fish...thats not correct.

In addition, teams are restricted from trading away future first round draft picks in consecutive years. This is called the "Ted Stepien Rule." Stepien owned the Cavs from 1980-83, and made a series of bad trades that cost the Cavs several years' first round picks. The trades, as columnist Chris Young put it, "amounted to giving up Manhattan for a bag of beads." As a result of Stepien's ineptitude, teams are now prevented from making trades which might leave them without a future first-round draft pick in consecutive years.

This rule applies only to future first round picks. For example, if this is the 99-00 season, then teams can trade their 2000 first round pick without regard to whether they had a 1999 pick, since their 1999 pick is no longer a future pick. But they can't trade away both their 2000 and 2001 picks, since both are future picks. Teams sometimes work around this rule by trading first round picks in alternate years.

In addition, teams are required to have only a first round pick, and not necessarily their first round pick. So teams may trade away their own future picks in consecutive years if they have another team's first round pick in one of those years.


http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#70
Like Fish was saying, you can't trade consecutive future draft picks, but you can trade the player you draft with that pick. So, the Knicks cannot offer a team their 2005 draft pick now, but they can draft a player and trade that player on or after drafter night.
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/11/2005  12:24 PM
Andrew.. thanks for the correction. Thats a little scary though because it means we can trade this year's #1.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
joec32033
Posts: 30615
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/11/2005  12:25 PM
Posted by TMS:

KT & HOU's 2nd rounder for Mo Taylor & HOU's 1st rounder?

say no to Juwan Howard...we don't need that contract on our books.

That was the first thing that I thought of to after readinf about this...look at the contracts...Howard's isn't horrible based on production but it is garauntees through 07 then there is a PLayer Option in 08....KT for Juwan str8 is a bad trade...what kind of packages can Houston be offering?

The contracts are basically a wash (KT actually makes a tad more)but KT is almost a double double guy...Juwan isn't even a single double guy!

Although....Here is an interesting connection....The Rockets right now have the 21 pick.....Zeke went to Europe and reportedly looked hard at Johan Petro...Our own pick is around #9...Petro was predicted to go around 20....

just a thought

[Edited by - joec32033 on 02/11/2005 12:29:21]
~You can't run from who you are.~
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/11/2005  12:43 PM
Posted by fishmike:

Andrew.. thanks for the correction. Thats a little scary though because it means we can trade this year's #1.
But you can still trade the player you draft with your first round pick, can't you? What Andrew posted doesn't address that issue.
2/11 Insider Trade Block

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy