[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Should the Knicks run it back?


Author Poll
GustavBahler
Posts: 22663
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

Should the Knicks run it back?
Yes
No
View Results


Author Thread
GustavBahler
Posts: 42663
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/8/2025  3:18 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/8/2025  3:20 PM
Im concerned about a desperation trade for a superstar that wont leave us enough to contend. I believe we could have beaten the Pacers, at least a much better chance. With more attention paid to the bench. A less taxed starting lineup, and a coach who excels at making adjustments in game.

Not saying to avoid deals for role players. But otherwise a more balanced lineup. A starter or more to the bench. And this squad might have a new lease on life.

AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71026
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/8/2025  4:07 PM
Not concerned about a "desperate move". two reasons:

1. Leon and Rosas seemed to have measured moves thus far. While not perfect they have improved the year every year.
I doubt the starphuch comes now. Unless Dolan orders it of course.
2. If they do a deal for Giannis, or AD, or other "desperate move" hindsight will tell the story.

Personally I don't think we were that close to pacers. If so you don't fire coach nor have the issues. Last years team had a cohesive mix suitable to Thibs. This year talent won more than "team". It was not a blow out. Knicks lost game one. It happend for many reasons. Games can be close, but that don't mean you are. You either win or you don't.

smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
6/8/2025  4:10 PM
There are real chemistry issues between OG and Mikal- both want to be the 2nd or 3rd option or will be grumpy. I think the Knicks need to ultimately move one of them for a better fit at SG
blkexec
Posts: 28291
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
6/8/2025  6:44 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/8/2025  6:46 PM
smackeddog wrote:There are real chemistry issues between OG and Mikal- both want to be the 2nd or 3rd option or will be grumpy. I think the Knicks need to ultimately move one of them for a better fit at SG

Both are inconsistent on offense. OG especially. Mikal does better when you feed him because he stays in his mid range zone. I feel like OG is so talented in multiple areas on offense, but he’s not great at one thing. I don’t know OG go to move but we know mikals.

I want to keep them both and just bring Mikal off the bench. Stagger their mins on the court together. We need their defense which is the key skill set.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39730
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/8/2025  6:44 PM
smackeddog wrote:There are real chemistry issues between OG and Mikal- both want to be the 2nd or 3rd option or will be grumpy. I think the Knicks need to ultimately move one of them for a better fit at SG

I didn't see this. If anything, I think Mikal was too passive and was way too content letting OG or whoever else take the shots. But don't get me wrong. I think there was frustration and it was between OG and JB's tunnel vision ways. Brunson tool a step up in his playmaking this season, but he needs to do better.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27446
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/8/2025  9:54 PM
Im in run it back with an added bench.

If Giannis was truly available, that’s probably the only thing I’d think hard on.

You know I gonna spin wit it
Chandler
Posts: 26773
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

6/9/2025  7:42 AM
EwingsGlass wrote:Im in run it back with an added bench.

If Giannis was truly available, that’s probably the only thing I’d think hard on.

Me too

Guys need to touch the balll more

Alpha on bench

Get the starting 5 to complement each others play

(5)(7)
Nalod
Posts: 71026
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/9/2025  8:31 AM
I interpret "run it back" with our core intact.
Up in the air is who our bench can contribute and the status of Hart and Mitch.
Leon rumored to have made a play for Durant by the past deadline and curious what assets/salary he offered. Obviously it was not enough.

Rose has a vision of Kat and Mikal with Jalen? Of was those to obtained as currency for another day?

NYKBocker
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
6/9/2025  8:56 AM
I would keep the starting 5. Mitch, KAT, OG, Mikal and JB. Try to get a 3&D guy that is 6'7"+ using Deuce as a trade piece. Develop Dadiet, Huk, McCullar and Kolek.
ramtour420
Posts: 26249
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
6/9/2025  11:17 AM
I want to see what these guys ( even Hart ) can do in a system that prioritizes ball movement. We can and should be putting up points in a rush!
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
Nalod
Posts: 71026
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/9/2025  12:19 PM
https://www.nba.com/stats/teams/isolation?SeasonType=Regular+Season

one can filter playoffs vs Reg seasons, all kinds of activity.
I don't see the knicks as high iso in regular seasons. I do for playoffs but given the nature of the games I get it.
Im looking at transition points and knicks are second to Indy.
Eye test vs stats. No agenda here so I'd ask someone without one to look it over and dissect it.
Knicks had great ball movement at times in regular season. Mostly early in season.
18 playoff games we were heavy iso.
Oh wait, we had 18 playoff games!!!!!
Philc1
Posts: 28271
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

6/9/2025  2:31 PM
Replace Thibs with Jeff Van Gundy. Maybe next playoffs I won’t have to hear that fat obnoxious **** Stan Van Gundy bash us every game because he’s still mad Dolan didn’t hire him 20 years ago
VDesai
Posts: 42499
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
6/9/2025  2:51 PM
They don't have a lot of choice. I think we let Achiuwa go and possibly bring in Horford with the TPMLE or Vet min. Probably will lose Shamet and Payne....maybe we can keep Delon Wright on a minimum. Good 3rd PG, extra wing who can play spot defensive minutes. INsurance for Kolek if he fails as a backup PG.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39730
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/9/2025  5:11 PM
VDesai wrote:They don't have a lot of choice. I think we let Achiuwa go and possibly bring in Horford with the TPMLE or Vet min. Probably will lose Shamet and Payne....maybe we can keep Delon Wright on a minimum. Good 3rd PG, extra wing who can play spot defensive minutes. INsurance for Kolek if he fails as a backup PG.

I can't see going into next season counting on Kolek as backup. This is a contending team and, unfortunately, Tyler hasnt shown he's up for the job. Horford might be a good idea, but it's a gamble given his age.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
GustavBahler
Posts: 42663
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/9/2025  6:13 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:They don't have a lot of choice. I think we let Achiuwa go and possibly bring in Horford with the TPMLE or Vet min. Probably will lose Shamet and Payne....maybe we can keep Delon Wright on a minimum. Good 3rd PG, extra wing who can play spot defensive minutes. INsurance for Kolek if he fails as a backup PG.

I can't see going into next season counting on Kolek as backup. This is a contending team and, unfortunately, Tyler hasnt shown he's up for the job. Horford might be a good idea, but it's a gamble given his age.

Our rooks played on average the fewest minutes in the league out of all the other teams. You might be right, but I believe it’s way too small a sample size. His D was starting to pick up when he got benched.

I will be pissed if we trade another good prospect before they get a real chance to show their potential . I hope the FO gives Kolek another season.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39730
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/9/2025  6:27 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:They don't have a lot of choice. I think we let Achiuwa go and possibly bring in Horford with the TPMLE or Vet min. Probably will lose Shamet and Payne....maybe we can keep Delon Wright on a minimum. Good 3rd PG, extra wing who can play spot defensive minutes. INsurance for Kolek if he fails as a backup PG.

I can't see going into next season counting on Kolek as backup. This is a contending team and, unfortunately, Tyler hasnt shown he's up for the job. Horford might be a good idea, but it's a gamble given his age.

Our rooks played on average the fewest minutes in the league out of all the other teams. You might be right, but I believe it’s way too small a sample size. His D was starting to pick up when he got benched.

I will be pissed if we trade another good prospect before they get a real chance to show their potential . I hope the FO gives Kolek another season.


Yeah definitely. I just hope they're not desperate enough to need to give him the role.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Knixkik
Posts: 35400
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/9/2025  6:28 PM
I’m fine with our top 7 plus adding another playmaking guard/ wing and big via free agency.
GustavBahler
Posts: 42663
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/9/2025  8:50 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:They don't have a lot of choice. I think we let Achiuwa go and possibly bring in Horford with the TPMLE or Vet min. Probably will lose Shamet and Payne....maybe we can keep Delon Wright on a minimum. Good 3rd PG, extra wing who can play spot defensive minutes. INsurance for Kolek if he fails as a backup PG.

I can't see going into next season counting on Kolek as backup. This is a contending team and, unfortunately, Tyler hasnt shown he's up for the job. Horford might be a good idea, but it's a gamble given his age.

Our rooks played on average the fewest minutes in the league out of all the other teams. You might be right, but I believe it’s way too small a sample size. His D was starting to pick up when he got benched.

I will be pissed if we trade another good prospect before they get a real chance to show their potential . I hope the FO gives Kolek another season.


Yeah definitely. I just hope they're not desperate enough to need to give him the role.

All that matters is that Kolek makes the most of any opportunity. Doesnt matter what the motivation is for Kolek to get PT as long as it turns out to be the right decision.

Even in those few minutes he got in the playoffs, Kolek was making thread the needle passes in traffic better than anyone else on the court.

How many rooks have come along in tbe NBA over the last few years with Kolek's passing skills? Imagine a second unit with Mitch and Kolek Lob city.

GustavBahler
Posts: 42663
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

6/9/2025  9:02 PM
blkexec wrote:
smackeddog wrote:There are real chemistry issues between OG and Mikal- both want to be the 2nd or 3rd option or will be grumpy. I think the Knicks need to ultimately move one of them for a better fit at SG

Both are inconsistent on offense. OG especially. Mikal does better when you feed him because he stays in his mid range zone. I feel like OG is so talented in multiple areas on offense, but he’s not great at one thing. I don’t know OG go to move but we know mikals.

I want to keep them both and just bring Mikal off the bench.
Stagger their mins on the court together. We need their defense which is the key skill set.

I hope the next coach tries it. Have to wonder how the team would have done without a top heavy lineup and more bench minutes.

VDesai
Posts: 42499
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
6/10/2025  9:55 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/10/2025  9:55 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
VDesai wrote:They don't have a lot of choice. I think we let Achiuwa go and possibly bring in Horford with the TPMLE or Vet min. Probably will lose Shamet and Payne....maybe we can keep Delon Wright on a minimum. Good 3rd PG, extra wing who can play spot defensive minutes. INsurance for Kolek if he fails as a backup PG.

I can't see going into next season counting on Kolek as backup. This is a contending team and, unfortunately, Tyler hasnt shown he's up for the job. Horford might be a good idea, but it's a gamble given his age.

Our rooks played on average the fewest minutes in the league out of all the other teams. You might be right, but I believe it’s way too small a sample size. His D was starting to pick up when he got benched.

I will be pissed if we trade another good prospect before they get a real chance to show their potential . I hope the FO gives Kolek another season.


Yeah definitely. I just hope they're not desperate enough to need to give him the role.

Thibs probably wouldn't give Kolek the backup role, but another coach would look at his PG skills and probably not hesitate. The Knicks took 4 players in the last draft against the apron for a reason. They knew they needed at least a few of these guys occupy rotation spots given how roster building in the new CBA works. They may HAVE to give Kolek the shot at that spot. No guarantees of getting another Payne with a Vet min that is a proven backup PG.

Should the Knicks run it back?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy