fishmike wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Panos wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Papabear wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:Rose needs to show commitment one way or another. If Obi isn't a Thibs type of player then he needs to adjust accordingly. If not then he should move on from Thibs for a coach that fits his vision of these type of players he looks to add. But being stuck in the middle will continue to cap us. Somewhat on and off topic.
Mitch, Randle, RJ don't provide enough spacing for each other as a frontcourt trio. Need snipers as their bench alternates to fill in and compliment. Which Obi isn't. Brunson is our franchise player. Currently constructed the lineup doesn't provide him the optimal amount of space for our franchise lead G. Personally id target Vooch with KP out the picture for starting center. And need a 3 & 4 or 3/4 sniper off the bench to sub in for RJ or Randle.
Papabear SaysThibs is a career destroyer. He is killing OBI and will burn out Bruinson and Randel. Thats why no one wants to come here to the Knicks. It makes me laugh when I see posters write and say how about getting this player or that player. Look other players on other teams see how thibs treat other players on this team.The only way we got Brunson was because his father was a coach on the Knicks.
Comes more down to fit and needs of the lineup. Obi was drafted to be Randle's replacement. Randle then had a great season and got extended. This now has made the roster fit sloppy. Obi is a pure 4 who doesn't offer flexibility to slide to the 3 or 5. Roster needs a player with more positional flexibility. Whose game is more fine tuned around the perimeter to compliment RJ-Randle-Mitch. If we are to run it back with them and want next level of results. If we are to hold on to Obi to be Randle insurance for one more season. Then it will continue to be a little sloppy, and he/we won't be in the best position to succeed. With the possibility that his value tanks.
So much for the logic of drafting BPA regardless of fit. Here is an example where that doesn't work out so well.
I think fit was taken into account. I'm still not convinced that Randle wasn't a goner going into the season. In retrospect, they should've just flipped the pick. Hal had a lot of question marks at the time and I don't blame them as much for not taking a swing. Also says something about taking a client who's represented by your son. 😏
Obi probably should of been moved once Randle was extended. Rose seems to operate more on a reactionary basis than progressive one though.
why? Obi has been a mostly effective and cost friendly back up. Randle just had ankle surgery. I have no pressure or need to trade Obi right now. Hopefully he has a fantastic season and forces us into tough decisions
Y? Because Obi can only play PF effectively. Averaged 15.7mins per game which got a slight bump with Randle getting a rare injury toward the end of the season. Top 8 lottery pick getting 15.7mins per at $5-7mil per into his 3rd yr isn't as cost effective overall. At least not compared to a SF/PF, &/or, PF/C who can get 20+mins behind RJ, Randle, Mitch who actually compliment them.
Combined RJ-Randle-Mitch shot 30% from 3 and 72% from FT last season.
Yet 0-10ft they shot
Randle: 0-3ft(68%) 3-10ft(52%)
Barrett:0-3ft(64%) 3-10ft(40%)
Mitch: 0-3ft(70%) 3-10ft(33%)
Need players behind and around them that provide what they lack. Offering more space for them to enhance what they do. If this is the frontcourt we are going to continue to run with.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.