Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Nalod
Posts: 71068 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() Paying a guy 100 mil, 22 years old to bench and then resign Kuzma to a 4 year, 80mil deal?
I don’t see that. Or pay Kuzma that much to come off the bench either. RJ as part of a “star deal”, then bring in Kuzma might make sense then. |
franco12
Posts: 34069 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 2/19/2004 Member: #599 USA |
![]() I don't know about salary - but I'd trade RJ for Kuzma, and give them their pick back. RJ probably does great in DC- and good for him. Tired of his middling performances this year.
I think Kuzma helps us a lot- he can play either SF or PF- not sure that Thibs would appreciate that flexibility. Absolutely no idea about his defense, but if I can get a legit three point threat to replace RJ the bricklayer, I am doing it! |
fishmike
Posts: 53800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
martin
Posts: 75995 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's Agreed. The guy I still think the Knicks should target is OG Anunoby. Good guess that he isn't on market in any way, know he has got 1 extra year after this and player option. Toronto has a lot of decisions to make over the next 2+ years with their roster, maybe this can shake out. Definitely a guy you would have to back-channel to convince to force his way to Knicks. High level role player type. All defensive team type guy. Solid SF. Not deficient offensively. Can play small ball PF easily. Fits team style perfectly. Super long, gets in passing lanes just like IQ, Grimes, McBride. I'd give up just a little less than what was in the Donovan package but still keep the substantial stuff on table for that type player. He is 25. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39744 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() martin wrote:fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's I think he did try that (not to the Knicks, but a more favorable environment) and Masai didn't flinch. I wouldn't mind him, but where does he play? Would Masai consider a Maple Mam a swap? I would normally be against such a trade, but I think RJ's upside is an OG type player. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
SergioNYK
Posts: 22532 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/8/2002 Member: #333 USA |
![]() Kuzma is a good player but I don't think he fits unless you swap him for Randle or RJ and we'll have to resign him and who knows how much money he'd want. And I don't want to commit almost $400M to Brunson, Randle, RJ and Kuzma.
|
martin
Posts: 75995 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's Respectfully disagree 100%. For one, I am targeting Anunoby for his high level role playing ability and all defensive team imminent potential; RJ don't got those qualifies and *maybe* in 2-3 years he becomes a statistically average offensive player for his role (and he will just never get there defensively at the levels anywhere near OG) - RJ has got a long way to go IMO just to get offensively average, no less beyond that. OG is going to be an UFA in summer 2024. I don't even need to pull the trigger on him this season, I'd be a patient hunter for this type of player. I'm banking on all the Toronto players contracts needing to be dealt with over the next 2 years and sit by patiently to see what kicks out also knowing that RJ is getting better and locked up long term on a really stable contract given the spike in salary cap that will also happen in 3 years. OG just fits too well next to the other long term pieces I am guessing will be on the roster *and* fits exactly the type player Thibs excels with. After OG, you get VERY close to making noise for the last super star. And that's where you want to be. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39744 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's I didn't mean RJ is at OG's levelor is guaranteed to get there. I meant RJ, assuming he meets his ceiling as a finished product, is looking at being an OG level player. That's why I'd probably do the trade if there's no unprotected picks involved. OG is good, but the team would still be two "star" players away from being serious with him on the roster. I understand the need to strike while the iron is hot if OG is available. But the team needs to save its bait for the bigger fish as well. Cap management also plays a part if the team waits until OG becomes UFA. Assuming the cap hits projected rise, what kind of market is OG looking at? JB money? Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35411 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's I think the way the Knicks currently play they are only one star away from a contender when you consider there’s only the Celtics and the bucks as real dominant teams. Knicks have a real case as a dominant defensive team that just needs a true star as a #1 and Randle, Brunson and Barrett plus the defensive supporting cast all continue to fall into their respective roles. But that would indicate getting a top 10-15 player using only draft picks and not losing a significant rotation piece. Let’s just say the Knicks somehow managed to land a top 10-15 player for Toppin and 5-6 first round picks. Let’s just say that player is Devin Booker for the sake of argument. I’d start Brunson, Booker, grimes, Randle and Mitch and use Barrett, Quickley, Deuce and Hart off the bench. Barrett as a 6th man between the 3 and 4. That’s a contender right now. If this level of play and defensive identity are sustainable, I agree with staying the course and waiting out a true star to land on the market. |
martin
Posts: 75995 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() Knixkik wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's Pretty much what I would have responded with. C, Superstar, OG, Grimes, Brunson. Maybe Mitch could be good enough as a defensive C, maybe not. But the larger part of having a smothering defensive team would stand. Think Toronto after Kawhi arrived. You put yourself in the room for high level play and that's all you ask for. OG gets you one step closer to the next step IMHO Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27945 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
![]() Knicks should stay away from lateral moves. For me, we would have same problem we have now which is how to get three players enough shots. Would also prefer someone with better 3pt shooting.
'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39744 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's Toronto, even if you take away DeRozan, was a better team than the Knicks are now. There's no Siakamnlevel player on the roster who shows huge upside and, if OG does make his way way here, the only realistic upgrade would have to come from the PF slot or the shooting guard slot. I would say center, but there's no way in hell any of the star centers are moving anytime soon. I'm happy the team is a game over .500, but they aren't doing much better than that this season. Maybe my mind changes if they keep rising as the season goes on, but now I think youth development is the best move. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35411 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
![]() martin wrote:Knixkik wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:fishmike wrote:no way... Kuzma is a finesse guy. We kill him every time. Keep RJ. He's a bulldozer. All the guy does is play hard and take it to the whole. Much more interested in finding RJ's peek. I've seen Kuzma's I know you’re down generally on RJ and I agree that OG is an upgrade as he puts up similar numbers offensively but with elite defense. I’m just not sure if OG offers enough of an upgrade (and definitely not as much growth opportunity) for the cost. He will drain assets that should be saved for a star. The exception would be trading for him during the draft with the 2023 picks and no future picks. But they didn’t want to trade him to Portland for the 7th pick last year, so we know the price is going to be big. I still go back to the center position being the most upgradeable position. With Brunson, grimes, Barrett and Randle, I just don’t see an opportunity to upgrade them short of an all-in star trade where you get a Booker, SGA, or Jaylen brown level player. I question even Levine or DeRozan being enough of an upgrade when you consider age/ injury. Levine is probably the obvious piece according to woj, but what’s the cost and what does a lineup look like as he replaces either Barrett or grimes in the lineup. |
Nalod
Posts: 71068 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() The EF for Nunn and Beverly is interesting. Keep one and waive the other? Both expiring. Undoes the EF opportunity.
ALso puts him in a place he can play and contribute. Its not cool to sign guys and bury them. I know they are getting paid, and EF did not play up to expectations but it is also Grimes pushing him and Thibs wants better defense. Not saying all the blame is on his or teams shoulders exclusively. But if you sign a player it sends a message to the NBA players when you take care of them either way. lets not forget he did well while in Boston for a short spell. What ever the reasoning he has had some good games here but he does not thrive in the Thibian universe. It happens. Reddish was a flyer on a weak CLT pick that is heavy protected. Not everything works out. Knicks are moving in the right direction on and off the court with a young core mostly we drafted. Imagine such a thing a few years ago? We talked about it. Next: when does Rokas come and what promise besides money can team make to entice him? Lets be real, Rokas might experience the talent gap and not dos so great here. |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39744 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Nalod wrote:The EF for Nunn and Beverly is interesting. Keep one and waive the other? Both expiring. Undoes the EF opportunity. I think the Lakers might want IQ in order to do that deal. If that's the case... pass. Fournier has been quiet and I have no issues keeping in the bench until the right trade comes along. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
martin
Posts: 75995 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:Nalod wrote:The EF for Nunn and Beverly is interesting. Keep one and waive the other? Both expiring. Undoes the EF opportunity. How about: Westbrook and picks (LA this year and Pho this year, Brock will wet his pants) to Knicks Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39744 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() martin wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:Nalod wrote:The EF for Nunn and Beverly is interesting. Keep one and waive the other? Both expiring. Undoes the EF opportunity. I'd sign up for that. I'm sure CP3 would object, but he's been so trash I don't think his opinion counts for much there anymore. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|