Author | Thread |
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
![]() https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/34665442/sources-phoenix-suns-jae-crowder-skip-training-camp-amid-trade-talks
The Suns' need a shot in the arm. Their window is closing with CP3 a year older, the rest of the West contenders all healthy (LAC, DEN, LAL) and a few, new upstarts entering the mix (MIN, NOP, SAC). Julius Randle might make sense for them as someone that can consistently create a shot for himself from the mid-range (which fits their culture) and others (albeit infrequently). It might not be the smoothest fit because of his tendency to hold the ball but the Suns clearly need a 2nd scorer and Julius is very much that. From our perspective, dumping Julius would allow us to see what our youth can do with increased usage ratings. I'd hate to give Obi and company extensions without having a better sense of who they are as players. Plus, we might be able to snag a first round pick from the exchange since the Suns don't evidently value them (based on James Jones' recent comments on the 2020 draft). Does Julius Randle for Jae Crowder, Landry Shamet and a first round pick make sense for both teams? To be honest, I like the fact we dump Randle but I'm concerned we'd have too many guaranteed players on the roster, when the focus should be on creating financial flexibility, roster flexibility and draft asset accumulation. I'd try to turn this into a 3-team trade and re-route those PHO players AND Evan Fournier to the Lakers for Russell Westbrook, first round pick swaps from 2027-2029 and whatever the Lakers have in the way of second round draft picks. http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2fmgkpdv That might not seem like much from the Knicks' perspective —especially since I'd waive Westbrook— but the Lakers are a mess of an organization and controlling their draft picks has emmense value because of the likelihood of them bottoming out once LeBron retires. I suspect they'll return to the range of drafting no.2 overall, like they did from 2015-2017 after Kobe Bryant retired. Just think of our optionally if my prediction is right! If not, at least we don't have to concern ourselves with Randle and Fournier's contract anymore, which is still a win. Thoughts? |
AUTOADVERT |
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/30/2017 Member: #7578 |
![]() Trade Randle!
|
fishmike
Posts: 53801 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() not trading Randle
![]() "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
SergioNYK
Posts: 22536 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/8/2002 Member: #333 USA |
![]() Leon loves Randle and isn't trading him unless it's for someone like Giannis.
![]() ![]() |
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
![]() Yuck
The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39748 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() ESOMKnicks wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Martin... for the sake of monotony, can we lock all future "Trade Randle" threads? There are conceivably 100 players in this league who could score 20 points a game if given the same amount of shots and minutes as Julius. Julius is one of the most inefficient of all of them. Sack of potatoes? I'd trade Randle for a knish. https://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2022_per_minute.html Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/14/2015 Member: #6064 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Martin... for the sake of monotony, can we lock all future "Trade Randle" threads? Number of shots and minutes may be subject to diminishing returns, in terms of efficiency too. |
martin
Posts: 75998 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() NardDogNation wrote:https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/34665442/sources-phoenix-suns-jae-crowder-skip-training-camp-amid-trade-talks Unless Suns are irrationally gaga over Randle the way Minny was for D'Angelo Russell, I just don't see how PHO would include a 1st round pick. They would really have to believe that Randle was a perfect fit and in the range of getting them to the championship even without the pick IMHO. I just don't see it. As an aside, Randle's trade kicker would kick in - 15% - and his incentives would also come into play, so his salary would be $23.7 + $2.3 (incentives), + $3M (15%) = $29M for that first year. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Marv
Posts: 35540 Alba Posts: 69 Joined: 9/2/2002 Member: #315 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Martin... for the sake of monotony, can we lock all future "Trade Randle" threads? not an unprotected knish. gotta be from yonah schimmel on the LES |
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39748 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() Marv wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Martin... for the sake of monotony, can we lock all future "Trade Randle" threads? OK. I guess we can hold out. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27947 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
![]() BigDaddyG wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Martin... for the sake of monotony, can we lock all future "Trade Randle" threads? Yawn!! We can come up with a lot more lists of "conceivables"! My neighbors son thinks it's conceivable that he will become a millionaire despite living in the basement at the age of 30 and without ever going to college. 100 players? Please post statistical evidence of 30 that have actually done so? Not just the ole BS "I think so" rant. And I'm sure you can come up with 20 that are nearly averaging that for their careers? Btw, Randle has done so with others having the main role. Ie. Davis. As for the ones you think can do it, why haven't they? They don't get the minutes? Shots? Is there a special process they keep missing out on? Is there an application process for getting minutes? (I always thought in the real world you had to earn them through years of production in games and practices) Nah, Players just have to show their coaches they can do it consistently. Show them they have that bull/alpha mentality and are unafraid to take the big shot. They have to prove they can produce despite teams defensive focussing on them. Not just because it's "conceivable" they can do so. BUT OK, MOST importantly, please post which of the players that have actually averaged 20/10 want anything to do with the Knicks?!! Fyi, You can be okay with trading Randle for a bag of potatoes but that just shows the level of perspective. One that, luckily for us, is not the same at the management level. This is the kind of impatient thinking that has kept the Knicks from developing in the past. Randle is a young solide player who can improve. He will have a better year as long as he takes less 3pt shots, gives up ball handling, plays downhill and establishes a rapport with a true PG. If he doesn't, the smart move is not the bag of potatoes but to trade him to a team needing a proven 20/10 in the playoffs. 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39748 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
![]() HofstraBBall wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Martin... for the sake of monotony, can we lock all future "Trade Randle" threads? I can think of one statistic off the bat. One of the most inefficient scorers in the league. No getting around it. He's not good enough to be a 20 point a scorer on a functional team. I've seen him actively destroy the offense with his weak long twos and contested midrange jumpers. Spinning doesn't equal winning. I won't call him trash. But he's a sixth man on a good team. He will have a better year as long as he takes less 3pt shots, gives up ball handling, plays downhill and establishes a rapport with a true PG? So basically, you're saying he will be a better player if he changes the way he's played for his entire career? Don't see it. I hope he proves me wrong, but I don't want to waste the salary cap space to watch him try and do it. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|