Ultimateknicks.com Forums: Knicks in on Mitchell trade

GustavBahler wrote:I know Ainge wants picks, but I would be surprised if we didnt have to give up Quickley. Not sure Id want to give up that much in picks.

Mitchell is very undersized at the 2

We would have the smallest back court in the league

GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

7/12/2022 9:32 PM

Reply with quote

Caseloads wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:I know Ainge wants picks, but I would be surprised if we didnt have to give up Quickley. Not sure Id want to give up that much in picks.

Mitchell is very undersized at the 2
We would have the smallest back court in the league

Good point. Not against the FO rolling the dice. Said as much. Id like to see how this lineup does before making any more changes. Brunson might make that unecessary. Might find the bench needs more help.

Kemet
Posts: 22087
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/23/2015
Member: #6148

7/12/2022 10:13 PM

Reply with quote

Fournier & Cam final yr contract & couple first rounders for Mitch

SergioNYK
Posts: 22626
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/8/2002
Member: #333
USA

7/12/2022 10:19 PM

Reply with quote

I hate dealing with Ainge. He'll never accept a fair trade. We're gonna have to severely overpay and include all of our picks plus most of our youth. We'll be depleted of depth, youth and picks for a guy who is not a franchise level player.

I'd pass.

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27643
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA

7/12/2022 10:24 PM

Reply with quote

Mitchell is 6’2 with a 6’10 wingspan. By comparison, Evan Fournier is 6’7 with a 6’7.5 wingspan. Barrett also has a 6’10 wingspan.

Issue is that Mitchell played better at PG last year…

You know I gonna spin wit it

joec32033
Posts: 30616
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA

7/12/2022 10:58 PM

Reply with quote

You are enough getting Mitchell without giving up one of Quick/Obi/Grimes. Reddish is a throw in as is any salary cap relief. No one is signing with Utah. This trade will be all about controllable assets and draft picks.

Rose (to make contract work)
Reddish
Toppin (or IQ)
3 or 4 picks

That is going to be the ideal package. But Utah is probably going to want

Rose
Toppin
Quickly
Grimes
Reddish
and minimum 4 picks.

And that is IF you can keep RJ off the table, which you may be able to due to the fact he is due his extension soon.

~You can't run from who you are.~

BigDaddyG
Posts: 40003
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

7/12/2022 11:02 PM

Reply with quote

SergioNYK wrote:I hate dealing with Ainge. He'll never accept a fair trade. We're gonna have to severely overpay and include all of our picks plus most of our youth. We'll be depleted of depth, youth and picks for a guy who is not a franchise level player.
I'd pass.

And you know Pat is ruthless and Masai don't give a f#$k either. The bidding war gonna be intense.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41

7/12/2022 11:55 PM

Reply with quote

https://nypost.com/2022/07/12/donovan-mitchell-trade-would-take-knicks-dealing-rj-barrett/

Do not trade RJ for a shorter Mitchell.

Do not trade obi, Mitch, grimes, or quick, or sims.

Picks? Go for it. But players that are promising? No thanks, ainge

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41

7/13/2022 12:05 AM

Reply with quote

EwingsGlass wrote:Mitchell is 6’2 with a 6’10 wingspan. By comparison, Evan Fournier is 6’7 with a 6’7.5 wingspan. Barrett also has a 6’10 wingspan.
Issue is that Mitchell played better at PG last year…

Celtics and golden state showed that you need size at every position

Mitchell is supremely undersized and got exposed in this year’s playoffs

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41

7/13/2022 12:07 AM

Reply with quote

GustavBahler wrote:
Caseloads wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:I know Ainge wants picks, but I would be surprised if we didnt have to give up Quickley. Not sure Id want to give up that much in picks.

Mitchell is very undersized at the 2
We would have the smallest back court in the league
Good point. Not against the FO rolling the dice. Said as much. Id like to see how this lineup does before making any more changes. Brunson might make that unecessary. Might find the bench needs more help.

I want to see how much better this team is with a real PG. maybe rj is a 26 ppg scorer with a PG

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41

7/13/2022 12:08 AM

Reply with quote

SergioNYK wrote:I hate dealing with Ainge. He'll never accept a fair trade. We're gonna have to severely overpay and include all of our picks plus most of our youth. We'll be depleted of depth, youth and picks for a guy who is not a franchise level player.
I'd pass.

Agree, don’t trade with Ainge

GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

7/13/2022 12:13 AM

Reply with quote

EwingsGlass wrote:Mitchell is 6’2 with a 6’10 wingspan. By comparison, Evan Fournier is 6’7 with a 6’7.5 wingspan. Barrett also has a 6’10 wingspan.
Issue is that Mitchell played better at PG last year…

Also some good points. Individual players aside, its harder to post up a 6'7 player. Id like to see if we need to commit a large part of the cap to a player, before we see if its really necessary. We have known for years that we needed a long term solution at PG.

Not saying Brunson will fix everything. In the camp that we should see how this lineup does before seeing if a position actually needs upgrading. Now that we have a legit starting PG.

Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41

7/13/2022 12:21 AM

Reply with quote

GustavBahler wrote:
EwingsGlass wrote:Mitchell is 6’2 with a 6’10 wingspan. By comparison, Evan Fournier is 6’7 with a 6’7.5 wingspan. Barrett also has a 6’10 wingspan.
Issue is that Mitchell played better at PG last year…
Also some good points. Individual players aside, its harder to post up a 6'7 player. Id like to see if we need to commit a large part of the cap to a player, before we see if its really necessary. We have known for years that we needed a long term solution at PG.
Not saying Brunson will fix everything. In the camp that we should see how this lineup does before seeing if a position actually needs upgrading. Now that we have a legit starting PG.

Agree

gradyandrew
Posts: 22447
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

7/13/2022 2:09 AM

Reply with quote

I thought the reason we gave Brunson big money was because he thoroughly outplayed Donovan Mitchell in the playoffs? Didn't the Jazz fall apart whenever Rudy missed games and keep it together when D Mitchell did? Donovan Mitchell's rookie extension complicates trades with about half the league. His price will probably drop if the Jazz struggle going into next season. At the end of the day there's only one ball. I don't see this happening now.

Page 1 of 48 1 2 3 Next ›Last »

« Reply To Topic

Knicks in on Mitchell trade

Forum Index › NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.