Sometimes I think NY Fans = Let's trade anyone who produces but not at the unrealistic rate we dreamt of for a guy who produces less but we can at least start a new unrealistic dream about what he will do here. Can see the hope but it is still a gamble. Why trade for a guy who we will have to Max and who produces less than just one of the two guys you want to include in the package? And you want to add Mitchell? Do you really think if we had Ayton this year without Mitch and Randle, we would have won a playoff round? Not to mention that Ayton is not exactly a great example of "modern NBA" centers. So hard to build a future around him.
Why not trade, our best asset, Randle for pieces that would fill gaps and that replace Randle's level of production instead? Ones that fit a model of what is having success. Or why not trade him for someone that fills your biggest void? Ie PG.
A guy like Ayton just does not move the needle IMHO. Rather stick with Mitch and Randle and figure out PG need. IQ as a starter and a solid backup may be the only thing needed to get us in the playoffs.
'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020