Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/fredkatz/status/1509287740944392197

Q1 11:27
NYK 0 CHA 2

Q1 9:00
NYK 9 CHA 9

Q1 6:22
NYK 18 CHA 16

Q1 3:01
NYK 26 CHA 20

Q1 35.0
NYK 31 CHA 26

martin wrote:

martin wrote:I don’t want to push the blame on RJ but if he hits 80% from FT line and in some key games this year, Knicks prob solidly in playoffs picture.

If Rose was healthy, Knicks probably have better record than Brooklyn.

If Randle shoots 35% instead of 30% and skips all of the 18 foot fadeaways.
If the Knicks never sign Kemba.
If Fournier plays matador D one less time per game

All of these are right and wrong at the same time. Maybe they lose by a different 2 points instead of the couple they actually lost by. But that’s the game. Football is a game of inches and basketball is a game of microtransactions. 1,000 microtransactions that add up to 106 points per 100 possessions and 112 points against per 100 possession. You remove 1 or 2 turnovers, add back a couple rebounds, hit a couple more free throws, take a few less bad shots and a make a couple extra passes and then it’s 112 points for and 103 points against every 100 possession and I’m no longer talking about Tari Eason, I’m talking about who I hope drops to the end of the first round. The differences aren’t that big in point total, but it’s a lot of microtransactions that have to go right…