Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/KnickFilmSkool/status/1506141343172767744

SergioNYK wrote:Wish Thibs would just start IQ and play him 35 minutes. Let these final 11 be his personal playoffs. Continuing with Burks is so stupid.

This is called development, like it or not.

Not every player is ready to start and do well with those minutes and instantly be stable and productive enough to also not **** up things that other players are trying to do.

Throwing stuff against a wall and hoping it sticks is not a well thought out process, cause that's what you are suggesting in essence.

Knixkik wrote:Everyone needed to be more patient with IQ. He hit the sophomore slump and was a better fit alongside rose which didn’t happen much this year.

IMHO it's a benefit in hindsight that the Rose injury let IQ get more minutes with the ball in his hands.

fishmike wrote:

Knixkik wrote:Everyone needed to be more patient with IQ. He hit the sophomore slump and was a better fit alongside rose which didn’t happen much this year.

patient as in make him wait behind Brunson for 4 years to see if he's starting material? I would rather play IQ and live with the mistakes than watch Trey Young drop 40 in another 4-1 first round exit while watching Brunson/Fournier checking other team's starting backcourt

Feel the same way as well. I just don't see the FVV that others see quite yet.

fishmike wrote:

TPercy wrote:

fishmike wrote:

Knixkik wrote:Everyone needed to be more patient with IQ. He hit the sophomore slump and was a better fit alongside rose which didn’t happen much this year.

patient as in make him wait behind Brunson for 4 years to see if he's starting material? I would rather play IQ and live with the mistakes than watch Trey Young drop 40 in another 4-1 first round exit while watching Brunson/Fournier checking other team's starting backcourt

Feel the same way as well. I just don't see the FVV that others see quite yet.

cause its not there. Brunson is a good BB player and has a nice role on offense. Knicks are a 30ish win team. Brunson is not moving that needle enough for all the downsides

You compare Brunson first three years in the league to FVV's and you can say there's enough evidence to say the comparison bis there. Different players. FVV is much more of an explosive shooter and Brunson is a smoother operator in the paint. But the trajectories are similar.

Philc1 wrote:

fishmike wrote:

TPercy wrote:

fishmike wrote:

Knixkik wrote:Everyone needed to be more patient with IQ. He hit the sophomore slump and was a better fit alongside rose which didn’t happen much this year.

patient as in make him wait behind Brunson for 4 years to see if he's starting material? I would rather play IQ and live with the mistakes than watch Trey Young drop 40 in another 4-1 first round exit while watching Brunson/Fournier checking other team's starting backcourt

Feel the same way as well. I just don't see the FVV that others see quite yet.

cause its not there. Brunson is a good BB player and has a nice role on offense. Knicks are a 30ish win team. Brunson is not moving that needle enough for all the downsides

Disagree. Adding a competent starting pg can make a 10-15 win difference in todays nba

Knicks sign Brunson
Knicks are better with good PG play in Brunson and Rose.
Thibs plays Brunson 30+ minutes a game!
IQ's playing time pinched. McBride doesnt see the floor.
Knicks lose in first found because any PG that goes up against the Knicks lights us up for 40
Knick fans turn on coach for playing Fournier and Brunson together and not playing McBride who's good on defense.
Its the coaches fault! We need a NEW COACH

Sorry midgets who cant stop anyone on the other team dont excite me. Just not my kind of player. Seen this movie play out over and over. Brunson is a good player but a low ceiling acquisition that ensures we are a first round caliber team while fans bitch about the coach not developing the 2nd rounders we drafted.