Author | Thread |
ToddTT
Posts: 30456 Alba Posts: 53 Joined: 8/30/2001 Member: #105 |
![]() A week or two ago I think we were at about 35% to get #8, and also 35% chance for #9.
Now this site is saying 70% we get #10. With no chance for 8 or 9. https://www.tankathon.com/pick_odds M*********er!!! Oh good lord... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XkmGrX7O0lQ
|
AUTOADVERT |
Philc1
Posts: 28292 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 9/2/2020 Member: #8897 |
![]() Knicks odds of picking 8th overall: 100%
|
Panos
Posts: 30057 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 1/6/2004 Member: #520 |
![]() Philc1 wrote:Knicks odds of picking 8th overall: 100% HAHAHA |
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/30/2017 Member: #7578 |
![]() Panos wrote:franco12 wrote:Everyone was talking (media that I was reading) about the Bridges when we picked Knox. Someone in the FO was trying to be too cute. Either Bridges would have been tremendous picks for us and likely change the complexion of this season. More revisionist BS. Here are two (Bleacher Report and NBAdraft.net), but check out pretty much any mock from 2018. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2781931-2018-nba-mock-draft-final-2-round-predictions https://www.nbadraft.net/2018-extended-mock-draft-5-2/ In these (and others) Knox is listed just ahead of Mikal as the Knicks pick, with Miles going several after. Or look up 2017 and see Frank listed ahead of Mitchell. Or Obi ahead of Halliburton in 2020. Am I saying these were the right picks? Hell no. But the de rigueur FO bashing that they made a stupid pick is absolute nonsense. I promise you at the time if we had picked Donovan Mitchell the same bing bongers who now say we should have would have wet their pants to emergency status. There was no great groundswell for the Bridges. Criticize the scouting, the development, the organization -- but these picks were not overall viewed as clear mistakes at the time. Except by those who figured DSJ was the way to go and hated Phil and thereby Frank (who was generally slotted right around where we picked him -- look it up). |
Panos
Posts: 30057 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 1/6/2004 Member: #520 |
![]() KnickDanger wrote:Panos wrote:franco12 wrote:Everyone was talking (media that I was reading) about the Bridges when we picked Knox. Someone in the FO was trying to be too cute. Either Bridges would have been tremendous picks for us and likely change the complexion of this season. It's not BS. Its the way I remember it. Maybe I remember it wrong. Or maybe I just remember how we were discussing it on UK. |
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/30/2017 Member: #7578 |
![]() Panos wrote:KnickDanger wrote:Panos wrote:franco12 wrote:Everyone was talking (media that I was reading) about the Bridges when we picked Knox. Someone in the FO was trying to be too cute. Either Bridges would have been tremendous picks for us and likely change the complexion of this season. It is total BS if you present it as the media was saying the Knicks should have taken one of the Bridges instead of Knox when in fact if you look it up that wasn’t the case at all. The part about that’s how you remember it I believe. But it isn’t just you. But why should anyone - media or fans - deal with facts when you can just present your biased opinion as one? That’s how it goes these days. |