[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Gotta pay Burcks and Rose
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/2/2021  6:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/2/2021  6:58 PM
Rose changed the dynamics of this team from losing to winning. I’d lock him for two years 15 mm

Burcks if he can stay healthy is a top 6 player on this team and potential 6 th man of the year type who if needed can also start. I’m hoping 3 years 21 million will be fair.

The big guys are a wait and see. Gibson as a third or fourth big yes for the vet min.

But we need to put some cash into Burks and rose.

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Clean
Posts: 30313
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
7/2/2021  8:53 PM
I agree that Rose and Burks are the 2 I want to re-sign most. Bullock is too streaky and 1 dimensional. I won't mind him off the bench but it also depends on how much he would cost.
Knixkik
Posts: 35423
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/2/2021  9:11 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/2/2021  9:11 PM
I’m honestly so torn between Bullock and Burks. Bullock was the heart of the defense and wins seems to come our way when his shooting was on. Burks took over games when needed and provides shot creation on the wing that is pretty hard to come by. We also can’t just bring back both if we want to get better. We have the money and need upgrades somewhere. It’s a tough situation that will need to just play itself out.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/2/2021  9:28 PM
Knixkik wrote:I’m honestly so torn between Bullock and Burks. Bullock was the heart of the defense and wins seems to come our way when his shooting was on. Burks took over games when needed and provides shot creation on the wing that is pretty hard to come by. We also can’t just bring back both if we want to get better. We have the money and need upgrades somewhere. It’s a tough situation that will need to just play itself out.

That’s why I want Duarte. I really believe he’s plug and play. He has more overall skills and will be cost controlled at cheap pay

RIP Crushalot😞
BillTheButcher
Posts: 20633
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2016
Member: #6326

7/2/2021  11:41 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/2/2021  11:42 PM
If its between Burks & Bullock , I'd rather bring back Burks. I also agree on Rose if its cheap , if we manage his minutes right he can kill other teams second units + he can mentor and is a vet presence .
[IMG]http://i1167.photobucket.com/albums/q636/shemmue0311/member15202.png[/IMG]
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

7/3/2021  12:35 AM
Rose might be great on a one year balloon payment deal. A lot of people are underrating how much better the Knicks became once he got here.
The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
gradyandrew
Posts: 22403
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

7/3/2021  12:35 AM
We can bring back the whole crew, Rose, Bullock0, Burks, Noel, and yes, Even Frank and still have about 20 million to get a starting PG.
Knixkik
Posts: 35423
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/3/2021  12:39 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
Knixkik wrote:I’m honestly so torn between Bullock and Burks. Bullock was the heart of the defense and wins seems to come our way when his shooting was on. Burks took over games when needed and provides shot creation on the wing that is pretty hard to come by. We also can’t just bring back both if we want to get better. We have the money and need upgrades somewhere. It’s a tough situation that will need to just play itself out.

That’s why I want Duarte. I really believe he’s plug and play. He has more overall skills and will be cost controlled at cheap pay

I agree about Duarte completely. He’s an NBA ready rotation wing. He’s a priority even if we have to use 19 and 32 to trade up a few spots. To me if we can’t get Bouknight by combining picks than Duarte is ideal. He gets knocked for his age but will be a better player in his prime than half the guys drafted ahead of him.

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/3/2021  5:56 AM
All three- Rose, Burks & Bullock outperformed their money and I’d also argue, likely what we can expect again from them next year or seasons after. I agree on bringing Rose back on a fair $#.

But we have to find the next guys out there that can come in and have solid years. I think we can find replacements for Burks & Bullocks, so unless they are coming back on MLE or vet min type deals, we should pass.

ToddTT
Posts: 30470
Alba Posts: 53
Joined: 8/30/2001
Member: #105
7/3/2021  11:09 AM
I think a bunch of our guys will play better next year. And it’s clear they have great chemistry.

Bring ‘em all back plus a playmaking point guard.

Also looking forward to the league clamping down some on the herky-jerk bull**** calls. Let guys play defense!

Our playoff run was awful, but can’t wait for next season!

Oh good lord... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XkmGrX7O0lQ
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
7/3/2021  11:23 AM
If Knicks land a premier pg then no reason to bring back Rose. As for Burks, he is a role player and you can find another one who can shoot just like him for cheaper. Good bye to Bullock.. He has no handle, makes dumb mistakes at times during critical part of the game and he got toasted by trae young.. Good Bye Noel.. He cant cover big guys like Embiid, Capella or Brooke Lopez. MitchRob coming back at 275 pds and 7'0..
The Future. GO KNICKS!
Philc1
Posts: 28301
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

7/3/2021  12:09 PM
Rose and Burks I’d only bring back on 1 year deals
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/3/2021  12:33 PM
WOODMANnYk wrote:If Knicks land a premier pg then no reason to bring back Rose. As for Burks, he is a role player and you can find another one who can shoot just like him for cheaper. Good bye to Bullock.. He has no handle, makes dumb mistakes at times during critical part of the game and he got toasted by trae young.. Good Bye Noel.. He cant cover big guys like Embiid, Capella or Brooke Lopez. MitchRob coming back at 275 pds and 7'0..

Yeah we’re gonna improve w mitch. Not interested in Noel coming back cuz too much $$$

RIP Crushalot😞
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

7/3/2021  1:30 PM
franco12 wrote:All three- Rose, Burks & Bullock outperformed their money and I’d also argue, likely what we can expect again from them next year or seasons after. I agree on bringing Rose back on a fair $#.

But we have to find the next guys out there that can come in and have solid years. I think we can find replacements for Burks & Bullocks, so unless they are coming back on MLE or vet min type deals, we should pass.

If the goal is to chase a big FA in 2022, Longterm MLE money is too much.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/3/2021  6:53 PM
My thinking on this is to bring back Rose and Bullock. I think Bullock might be cheaper and I think Quickley can step into the role that Burke’s filled. I don’t know that Burke’s worked as well with Randle and I want Quickley to get 25 minutes a game next year. Plus, Bullock can play both SG and SF.
Trust the Process
fwk00
Posts: 22160
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

7/3/2021  7:40 PM
So Randle, Bullock, and Payton all share the same agent...
I get a bad vibe about this.
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2012
Member: #3997

7/3/2021  8:40 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Rose changed the dynamics of this team from losing to winning. I’d lock him for two years 15 mm

Burcks if he can stay healthy is a top 6 player on this team and potential 6 th man of the year type who if needed can also start. I’m hoping 3 years 21 million will be fair.

The big guys are a wait and see. Gibson as a third or fourth big yes for the vet min.

But we need to put some cash into Burks and rose.


IMHO, let them both explore the market and see what they can get. Then decide to give the same offer or one a little better or not. Or just let them walk.

I'm happy Rose changed his mentality and his perspective and humbled himself to accept he's no longer an MVP and a franchise player. But he didn't do that in his first Knicks run. He just upped and decided to skip a game. So, sorry to say it, Rose should never get more than a one year deal offered period by the Knicks. Or a 1+1 with a team option year with a small buyout. Honestly I wouldn't even give him the latter. He did play well for the Knicks this past season, but I got a long ass memory about bull**** like skipping games. He also had periods where he coasted a lot in his first Knicks stint.

I'm glad when people change. But everyone has to pay for their sins. And if you get a reputation as a franchise that won't enforce that, then you look like a total mark. Some ****, you don't forgive.

fwk00
Posts: 22160
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

7/3/2021  8:56 PM
TripleThreat wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Rose changed the dynamics of this team from losing to winning. I’d lock him for two years 15 mm

Burcks if he can stay healthy is a top 6 player on this team and potential 6 th man of the year type who if needed can also start. I’m hoping 3 years 21 million will be fair.

The big guys are a wait and see. Gibson as a third or fourth big yes for the vet min.

But we need to put some cash into Burks and rose.


IMHO, let them both explore the market and see what they can get. Then decide to give the same offer or one a little better or not. Or just let them walk.

I'm happy Rose changed his mentality and his perspective and humbled himself to accept he's no longer an MVP and a franchise player. But he didn't do that in his first Knicks run. He just upped and decided to skip a game. So, sorry to say it, Rose should never get more than a one year deal offered period by the Knicks. Or a 1+1 with a team option year with a small buyout. Honestly I wouldn't even give him the latter. He did play well for the Knicks this past season, but I got a long ass memory about bull**** like skipping games. He also had periods where he coasted a lot in his first Knicks stint.

I'm glad when people change. But everyone has to pay for their sins. And if you get a reputation as a franchise that won't enforce that, then you look like a total mark. Some ****, you don't forgive.

I'm thinking that if the Randle/Bullock relationship is that tight then Bullock (maybe even Payton) will get signed before Burks. Personally I think Burks adds more value assuming a SF is signed/traded in.

Rose sounded uncertain about his possible resigning. Knicks will be signing *somebody* AND drafting *somebody* at PG. Add the Argentinian and I can't count Rose minutes.

Once again, I agree with you about Rose's bipolar history with the Knicks. He (and his buddy Noah) absolutely back-stabbed Phil and the coaching staff with their indifference and unprofessionalism.

Nice that he's warm and fuzzy with Thibs but in NY, things change in a NY minute. 1 year tops.

wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

7/4/2021  3:16 AM
fwk00 wrote:So Randle, Bullock, and Payton all share the same agent...
I get a bad vibe about this.

Sort of explains why Payton started so much. Still worrisome overall.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
martin
Posts: 76105
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/4/2021  11:50 AM
wargames wrote:
fwk00 wrote:So Randle, Bullock, and Payton all share the same agent...
I get a bad vibe about this.

Sort of explains why Payton started so much. Still worrisome overall.

Do you really believe that?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Gotta pay Burcks and Rose

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy