TripleThreat wrote:Jimbo5 wrote:With a beefed up Analytics department, would you think any of these statistics will get the attention of the front office and the coaching staff? Will these inputs be taken into consideration when it comes to the players that they will resign, allow to walk or trade? I hope what ever moves they make in the offseason is backed up by the analytics department and not just their personal sentiments.
Nice to see new posters, but OP will need to give greater context when he's using stats like this.
Even RAPM has inherent flaws in it. Dotson also had that shoulder thing which spins the context some. There's also context for usage when a coach realizes he's fighting for his job for the next two weeks and not just at the end of the season.
In short, there is nothing wrong with giving Dotson extended burn, esp with the Knicks talent situation, but part the larger overall problem is signing veterans who have no retrade value. To be fair, most Tier 4/5 guys, where the Knicks have to shop, have no retrade value no matter what. Having 4-5 guys at contracts at like 8-9 million is actually a tax on auditioning players still in their prime developmental window. Middle class contracts are death to a perpetually losing team.
I'm not so sure you're wrong or that I disagree so much.
In terms of free agency I think the Knicks, while not in a great position of attraction, can shop wisely.
First, bring back Payton and Dotson. They know the teammates. They are no worse than the Tier 4/5 guys that get promoted (Augustine?, Teague?... there's a parade of retreads) - NO. Let's stick with known quality. Team chemistry can't be signed in free agency and you get that with Payton and Dotson that you wouldn't with hitch-hiking FAs whose best years are in the rear-view mirror.
Sign Morris. He's another team player, great chemistry, wants to be here. Passing that opportunity up would be a sin in the eyes of the basketball gods who already have us on their shiitt list.
The Knicks will make obligatory passes at FVV and others but this seems more like an exercise in acquiring trophy status than building a winner.
I do like the Christian Wood idea. It's risky and we often get burned but its rational, big upside, and a nice age-group fit. The risk is unanticipated baggage. But we are talking about the NBA.
By far the hardest problem to solve is not players we can/should acquire - it's the players we need to jettison sooner than later.
I think if we do make draft day deals, wrapping a pick (preferably one of this year's) with Randle, DSJ, or Knox for anything useful should be a priority. The business the Knicks have to get out of is being a hopeless player pound. NY is not good at being a halfway house for anyone.