Author | Thread |
smackeddog
Posts: 38389 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() I like Randle as person, and his work ethic, but he's a bad fit for this team if we're building around RJ and Mitch. Doubt you can get anything of value back, so the options seem to be trade him for expiring deals, or trade him for a 2 year deal that matches his (means you lose out on the non-guaranteed salary cap space you would have got by keeping him, but means you might get a better player back or a player that fits better/frees up the PF spot for a shooter).
Any realistic suggestions? I really struggle to think of a team that might take him for anything other than a switch of contracts (so if they had a 2 year deal, they might trade if for Randle because only $6mil of his second year is guaranteed. Straight up, here are the options: Randles deal: $18.9mil 20-21, $19mil 21-22 (only $6mil guaranteed) Using this: https://www.spotrac.com/nba/contracts/sort-average/free-agent-2021/limit-100/ 1 year expirings that match Randle (excluding completely unrealistic ones): Slim pickings! Cavs aren't an option (Thompson or Drummond if they drafted Wiseman) as they have Love (please don't trade Randle for Love!) OKC: Steven Adams (expiring $25mil)- I only say this because there was that photo of their boardroom or something where they had Randle name on a whiteboard last season- likely that was related to a CP3 trade. Would save them $6mil and they seem to do these reclamation projects (see Schroeder and CP3) Hornets: Batum $26mil (PJ Washington makes that very unlikely) That's it! there are no other options (just look at the list on that site). Hornets have the most contracts to shift, but he doesn't fit there at all. SO that takes us to the 2 year deals: https://www.spotrac.com/nba/contracts/sort-average/free-agent-2022/limit-100/ Hornets: Rozier deal (saves them money the 2year), but again, see above And again that's it. (look at the list) Teams with cap space- I just don't see which would be a good fit for him. Detroit is the one team desperate for anything but they have Griffin and will re-sign Wood. Ack, who am I kidding- the only way we get rid of Randle is if we trade him for CP3, which is probably our most likely move now we won't land Ball (and likely can't get a PG in free agency). Unless I've missed something? |
AUTOADVERT |
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
![]() smackeddog wrote:I like Randle as person, and his work ethic, but he's a bad fit for this team if we're building around RJ and Mitch. Doubt you can get anything of value back, so the options seem to be trade him for expiring deals, or trade him for a 2 year deal that matches his (means you lose out on the non-guaranteed salary cap space you would have got by keeping him, but means you might get a better player back or a player that fits better/frees up the PF spot for a shooter). I think randke will shine under this coaching staff. I would trade mitch to move up in the draft. ES
|
martin
Posts: 76208 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() knicks1248 wrote:smackeddog wrote:I like Randle as person, and his work ethic, but he's a bad fit for this team if we're building around RJ and Mitch. Doubt you can get anything of value back, so the options seem to be trade him for expiring deals, or trade him for a 2 year deal that matches his (means you lose out on the non-guaranteed salary cap space you would have got by keeping him, but means you might get a better player back or a player that fits better/frees up the PF spot for a shooter). Hard to pull it off but you are worse than Mills as a decision maker Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #542 USA |
![]() martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:smackeddog wrote:I like Randle as person, and his work ethic, but he's a bad fit for this team if we're building around RJ and Mitch. Doubt you can get anything of value back, so the options seem to be trade him for expiring deals, or trade him for a 2 year deal that matches his (means you lose out on the non-guaranteed salary cap space you would have got by keeping him, but means you might get a better player back or a player that fits better/frees up the PF spot for a shooter). I’m not against trading Mitch under the right circumstances but I agree with Martin. If I am trading Mitch, I want a guarantee. I don’t see any guarantees in this draft. Not even the projected top 3 and not even the guy I want-Nesmith. Believe me. I love Mitch but I am also a big critic of his. He was a decent reason why we sucked this year, IMO. He’s going to have to take a big step forward this next season, in 3,000 years. With that said, I want something major in return if we are trading for him. Moving up in this draft doesn’t strike me as major. “Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
![]() martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:smackeddog wrote:I like Randle as person, and his work ethic, but he's a bad fit for this team if we're building around RJ and Mitch. Doubt you can get anything of value back, so the options seem to be trade him for expiring deals, or trade him for a 2 year deal that matches his (means you lose out on the non-guaranteed salary cap space you would have got by keeping him, but means you might get a better player back or a player that fits better/frees up the PF spot for a shooter). I actually was listening to KNICKFANTV and they were the ones who mention it, and I thought is was a solid idea for the right pieces. I'm not saying just trade him and our pick to move up a few slots, but the center position has not had a real impact in these playoffs. Its all about small ball. Look at the game dude, these playoffs are not the half court low scoring games of the past. Toronto's Bench scored a 100 points yesterday ES
|