Gordon has a 1 year player option at $34M, and if Boston decides to trade it would be for a salary dump. Only so many places he could land - Atlanta being one of them.
You put him in a lineup at SF for a year and you have a spacer and focal point of offense for NY.
I'd assume assets would HAVE to come to the Knicks for this type of deal if NY was his landing spot. Boston got 14, 26, 30, 47 and they can't keep that many players on roster and a $140M salary structure for next year. I really have no idea what type of player they would target.
All those dev coaches gotta do something on the Knicks to earn their keep.
shinmen wrote:I would definitely take a chance but without any asset coming out from our chest. Even if he has an injury rigged season, it's not catastrophic since he has only 1 year left. However, he would remove the focus on RJ and our other youngsters to make a few easy baskets and build confidence and improve.
Chandler wrote:i would pass. biggest reason is risk/reward. IF we could make a run and if it didn't work out we could cleanly part ways that would be one thing, but that's probably not the case. given the injury history we could have a Joachim Noah situation where we're saddled with a bad contract on a guy who can't play
this is what i hate about the CBA. **** teams need to take risks but then you're punished if that doesn't work out