[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Can we take a chance on Gordon Hayward?
Author Thread
Jimbo5
Posts: 20878
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2020
Member: #8854

8/18/2020  9:58 PM
With Hayward's Celtics tenure not what they are expecting it to be. Now that Bryant is in the team, a person credited with developing Hayward with the Jazz, would you consider buying low on Wayward with the hopes he can resuscitate his career with the help of Bryant. Maybe the Celtics can give us a 1st rounder for getting Hayward off their books?
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71153
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/18/2020  10:26 PM
Jimbo5 wrote:With Hayward's Celtics tenure not what they are expecting it to be. Now that Bryant is in the team, a person credited with developing Hayward with the Jazz, would you consider buying low on Wayward with the hopes he can resuscitate his career with the help of Bryant. Maybe the Celtics can give us a 1st rounder for getting Hayward off their books?

I think Haywood can opt out. Salary wise might not be a good idea but longer term perhaps.
I’m still thinking the path is a trio fo stars: One Drafted, one traded for and one Free agent. I’d like to think RJ has the potential to be a 20 pt scorer.
Have to have some imagination. We did not bring in coaches to recruit first, but to bring a process/formula that produced the Mitchells and Haywoods.
I’ll take Haywood in a few years as a finishing piece to a team trying to contend. I Like his game a lot. Just not sure we want to to tie up cap on him so early in our build.

martin
Posts: 76208
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/18/2020  10:49 PM
Hell yes
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Jimbo5
Posts: 20878
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2020
Member: #8854

8/18/2020  11:24 PM
I agree with you Nalod regarding the assistants coaches regarding recruiting stars, i think we should all focus on the fact that these assistants have a track record of developing players into stars. The main focus should be for them to develop our existing youth to be stars, if with their presence it helps get the stars here, then thats just a bonus. If it doesn't happen, no biggy, hopefully they can develop our home grown superstars soon!

I think Hayward knows he is on his last leg and if he opts out, realistically he should not ask for a max deal. I think he got his money already with the Celtics his focus should shift now.

martin
Posts: 76208
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/18/2020  11:55 PM
Jimbo5 wrote:I agree with you Nalod regarding the assistants coaches regarding recruiting stars, i think we should all focus on the fact that these assistants have a track record of developing players into stars. The main focus should be for them to develop our existing youth to be stars, if with their presence it helps get the stars here, then thats just a bonus. If it doesn't happen, no biggy, hopefully they can develop our home grown superstars soon!

I think Hayward knows he is on his last leg and if he opts out, realistically he should not ask for a max deal. I think he got his money already with the Celtics his focus should shift now.

It’ll shift right after he earns the last year of that sweet sweet player option at $34M, otherwise his wife will cut his balls off

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/19/2020  2:49 AM
My issue with Hayward is the fact he keeps getting injured every time he's ready to go on a tear. And also he apparently looked great every practice last year but then struggled in the games (Celtics sources were saying his struggles were mental)- not sure Knicks is the best place to be for players who struggle with confidence.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39872
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

8/19/2020  10:26 AM
smackeddog wrote:My issue with Hayward is the fact he keeps getting injured every time he's ready to go on a tear. And also he apparently looked great every practice last year but then struggled in the games (Celtics sources were saying his struggles were mental)- not sure Knicks is the best place to be for players who struggle with confidence.

I guess it depends on how low we'd be buying him. He' s 30 and injury prone.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
shinmen
Posts: 20363
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2015
Member: #6029
France
8/19/2020  10:34 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/19/2020  10:35 AM
I would definitely take a chance but without any asset coming out from our chest. Even if he has an injury rigged season, it's not catastrophic since he has only 1 year left. However, he would remove the focus on RJ and our other youngsters to make a few easy baskets and build confidence and improve.
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

8/19/2020  10:40 AM
i would pass. biggest reason is risk/reward. IF we could make a run and if it didn't work out we could cleanly part ways that would be one thing, but that's probably not the case.

given the injury history we could have a Joachim Noah situation where we're saddled with a bad contract on a guy who can't play

this is what i hate about the CBA. **** teams need to take risks but then you're punished if that doesn't work out

(5)(7)
martin
Posts: 76208
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
8/19/2020  10:53 AM
Gordon has a 1 year player option at $34M, and if Boston decides to trade it would be for a salary dump. Only so many places he could land - Atlanta being one of them.

You put him in a lineup at SF for a year and you have a spacer and focal point of offense for NY.

I'd assume assets would HAVE to come to the Knicks for this type of deal if NY was his landing spot. Boston got 14, 26, 30, 47 and they can't keep that many players on roster and a $140M salary structure for next year. I really have no idea what type of player they would target.

All those dev coaches gotta do something on the Knicks to earn their keep.


shinmen wrote:I would definitely take a chance but without any asset coming out from our chest. Even if he has an injury rigged season, it's not catastrophic since he has only 1 year left. However, he would remove the focus on RJ and our other youngsters to make a few easy baskets and build confidence and improve.

Chandler wrote:i would pass. biggest reason is risk/reward. IF we could make a run and if it didn't work out we could cleanly part ways that would be one thing, but that's probably not the case.

given the injury history we could have a Joachim Noah situation where we're saddled with a bad contract on a guy who can't play

this is what i hate about the CBA. **** teams need to take risks but then you're punished if that doesn't work out

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
MS
Posts: 27060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
8/19/2020  11:10 AM
I would explore trading Randle for Hayward as they are both on one year deals. Not a bad trade for either team.

He’s a nice player but a little redundant on Boston. Maybe throw in a second round pick. Need to stabilize the lineup and give RJ some room.

fwk00
Posts: 22162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

8/19/2020  11:29 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/19/2020  11:30 AM
Why???

A year or so ago it made sense to trade for him and some picks or worthwhile assets when he was nothing but a money sink.

Now, he's rehabilitated himself into a head case who has a bad habit of running himself onto the disabled list.

Unless Boston is taking Randle, DSJ, and Knox off our hands and sending back #26 and Wanamaker, forget it.

jskinny35
Posts: 21582
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
8/19/2020  1:16 PM
Let's check back in after he turns 32 and is 80% of himself... see Kiki, Rolando, Derek, McGrady, Penny, Steve Francis, etc...
Nalod
Posts: 71153
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/19/2020  2:13 PM
Boston has Kemba and has to pay Jaylen and Tatum.
At the same time Haywood came to play with Brad Stevens his college coach. He took the one less year to go.
At the very least if trading Haywood give him the choice of where he lands and we need to give him some picture of the future. We want him for just one year? What’s the price of all this? He’ll eat a lot of cap next year which is ok, but the year after is the big one.
Randle is a good chip to trade but who plays PF? I know we shyt al over him but the guy can play and we should assume Thibs gets guys “In the right position”.
Haywood stepped on a players foot, it happens. It was his “bad ankle”. Good news is it did not break!
On the surface I like his talent and think he’d be good for the Knicks. But there is a chess game being played and the strategy is not known to us.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/19/2020  2:57 PM
Nalod wrote:Boston has Kemba and has to pay Jaylen and Tatum.
At the same time Haywood came to play with Brad Stevens his college coach. He took the one less year to go.
At the very least if trading Haywood give him the choice of where he lands and we need to give him some picture of the future. We want him for just one year? What’s the price of all this? He’ll eat a lot of cap next year which is ok, but the year after is the big one.
Randle is a good chip to trade but who plays PF? I know we shyt al over him but the guy can play and we should assume Thibs gets guys “In the right position”.
Haywood stepped on a players foot, it happens. It was his “bad ankle”. Good news is it did not break!
On the surface I like his talent and think he’d be good for the Knicks. But there is a chess game being played and the strategy is not known to us.

Go the Briggs route and sign Christian Wood. If you trade Randle for Haywood and then sign Wood, you actually make things much easier for Barrett and even Mitch. You would obviously have to worry about health, which is never a good thing but it’s a half decent step in the right direction.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/19/2020  3:04 PM
... and I would ONLY trade Randle for Haywood.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Knixkik
Posts: 35445
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
8/19/2020  3:10 PM
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Boston has Kemba and has to pay Jaylen and Tatum.
At the same time Haywood came to play with Brad Stevens his college coach. He took the one less year to go.
At the very least if trading Haywood give him the choice of where he lands and we need to give him some picture of the future. We want him for just one year? What’s the price of all this? He’ll eat a lot of cap next year which is ok, but the year after is the big one.
Randle is a good chip to trade but who plays PF? I know we shyt al over him but the guy can play and we should assume Thibs gets guys “In the right position”.
Haywood stepped on a players foot, it happens. It was his “bad ankle”. Good news is it did not break!
On the surface I like his talent and think he’d be good for the Knicks. But there is a chess game being played and the strategy is not known to us.

Go the Briggs route and sign Christian Wood. If you trade Randle for Haywood and then sign Wood, you actually make things much easier for Barrett and even Mitch. You would obviously have to worry about health, which is never a good thing but it’s a half decent step in the right direction.

If we are going to bring in another 4, i want it to be a true stretch 4. Bertans, Gallinari, Melo, or J Grant.

Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/19/2020  4:00 PM
Knixkik wrote:
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Boston has Kemba and has to pay Jaylen and Tatum.
At the same time Haywood came to play with Brad Stevens his college coach. He took the one less year to go.
At the very least if trading Haywood give him the choice of where he lands and we need to give him some picture of the future. We want him for just one year? What’s the price of all this? He’ll eat a lot of cap next year which is ok, but the year after is the big one.
Randle is a good chip to trade but who plays PF? I know we shyt al over him but the guy can play and we should assume Thibs gets guys “In the right position”.
Haywood stepped on a players foot, it happens. It was his “bad ankle”. Good news is it did not break!
On the surface I like his talent and think he’d be good for the Knicks. But there is a chess game being played and the strategy is not known to us.

Go the Briggs route and sign Christian Wood. If you trade Randle for Haywood and then sign Wood, you actually make things much easier for Barrett and even Mitch. You would obviously have to worry about health, which is never a good thing but it’s a half decent step in the right direction.

If we are going to bring in another 4, i want it to be a true stretch 4. Bertans, Gallinari, Melo, or J Grant.

Wood shot 39% from 3.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
fwk00
Posts: 22162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

8/19/2020  5:19 PM
Knixkik wrote:
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:Boston has Kemba and has to pay Jaylen and Tatum.
At the same time Haywood came to play with Brad Stevens his college coach. He took the one less year to go.
At the very least if trading Haywood give him the choice of where he lands and we need to give him some picture of the future. We want him for just one year? What’s the price of all this? He’ll eat a lot of cap next year which is ok, but the year after is the big one.
Randle is a good chip to trade but who plays PF? I know we shyt al over him but the guy can play and we should assume Thibs gets guys “In the right position”.
Haywood stepped on a players foot, it happens. It was his “bad ankle”. Good news is it did not break!
On the surface I like his talent and think he’d be good for the Knicks. But there is a chess game being played and the strategy is not known to us.

Go the Briggs route and sign Christian Wood. If you trade Randle for Haywood and then sign Wood, you actually make things much easier for Barrett and even Mitch. You would obviously have to worry about health, which is never a good thing but it’s a half decent step in the right direction.

If we are going to bring in another 4, i want it to be a true stretch 4. Bertans, Gallinari, Melo, or J Grant.

Melo is better off in Portland no reason to be here at all. There he's a cog. Here he's an amusement.

I would add Dario Saric to that list with Gallo and Saric being priority.

Knickfury11
Posts: 20290
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/19/2020
Member: #8856
United Kingdom
8/19/2020  5:58 PM
jskinny35 wrote:Let's check back in after he turns 32 and is 80% of himself... see Kiki, Rolando, Derek, McGrady, Penny, Steve Francis, etc...

Haha yeah he’s still too talented and a little on the young side...

Can we take a chance on Gordon Hayward?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy