[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

You get pick 1 u take this guy and it’s not close
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/23/2020  9:17 PM
https://www.instagram.com/p/CCw3leJjTpE/
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
7/24/2020  4:42 AM
Can he play PF, or is he definitely a C?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/24/2020  6:56 AM
smackeddog wrote:Can he play PF, or is he definitely a C?

I think he can cross to the 4. These guys are all 4-5s anyway/- most of them

RIP Crushalot😞
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/24/2020  7:58 AM
Drills against nobody is intoxicating. I hope they can put these kids in a bubble and work them out and combine them.
ankurk
Posts: 20149
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/23/2015
Member: #6075

7/24/2020  8:10 AM
agree 100%
much higher ceiling than mitch
makes mitch tradeable if the right opportunity comes along. until then wiseman/robinson 4/5
NYKBocker
Posts: 38411
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
7/24/2020  8:35 AM
The problem with bigs nowadays is that they can't cover the perimeter because they are slow footed. If Wiseman can cover the perimeter then Mitch and Wiseman can be a formidable twin towers alignment. Our defense can be extended all the way to the 3 point line without taking away our paint intimidation. They can then punish the other team in the paint if our guards can play the pick and roll right.
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/24/2020  8:35 AM
ankurk wrote:agree 100%
much higher ceiling than mitch
makes mitch tradeable if the right opportunity comes along. until then wiseman/robinson 4/5

No problem developing both at the same time. you go with best player available. Only player really untouchable is RJ. Not based on merit but intrigue and upside.

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/24/2020  8:37 AM
I'm not sold on taking him #1. I might go Ball, headaches and all.

The kid looks like a great athlete - but the thing I am worried about - I saw this in a video posted here on one of your other Wiseman is awesome threads- he just doesn't seem to have the grace of movement. Bad hands. Link below talks about heavy feet and bad hips and passing. I think Mitchell has more upside and fit. Our biggest need is PG. We get the first pick, I might pick Ball and hope he can develop and answer my questions about PG for the franchise:

Ball
Barrett
Robinson

Those are my big three, high impact skill players. Fill that roster out with grinders, guys that can defend, rebound and shoot the open three at a high percentage, and that is a team I think projects out to be a top team in the east as they mature and if they develop.

https://www.thestepien.com/2020/01/24/james-wiseman-scouting-report/

martin
Posts: 76214
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/24/2020  8:50 AM
I am trying to figure out what people see fundamentally in Wiseman that they think he is more talented than someone like Mitch? Help me understand this. I get that he is more muscular.

Mitch is a twitch fast athlete. Hand control grabbing lobs is high. He has demonstrated that he is a defensive player of the year kind of talent. Endless motor.

Mitch does lack fundamentals, late bloomer cause of lack of playing. Zero demonstrated shot. Seems like a worker but really can't tell.

Wiseman has a long way to go to, just like Mitch.

What would convince anyone that Wiseman would be a better big in the NBA than say Onyeka Okongwu, outside of being taller?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

7/24/2020  10:25 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/24/2020  10:25 AM
martin wrote:I am trying to figure out what people see fundamentally in Wiseman that they think he is more talented than someone like Mitch? Help me understand this. I get that he is more muscular.

Mitch is a twitch fast athlete. Hand control grabbing lobs is high. He has demonstrated that he is a defensive player of the year kind of talent. Endless motor.

Mitch does lack fundamentals, late bloomer cause of lack of playing. Zero demonstrated shot. Seems like a worker but really can't tell.

Wiseman has a long way to go to, just like Mitch.

What would convince anyone that Wiseman would be a better big in the NBA than say Onyeka Okongwu, outside of being taller?

Wiseman is a higher end guy than Mitch IMO... I think we are so bad that positions and roster is irrelevant. You take the BPA and go from there. Wiseman was my preseason #1 overall. He was with Penny Hardaway through AAU and came to Memphis and stayed with him. He knows how to play and I think is more complete than Mitch, even though they bring similar stats to the table. I really like how Wiseman seeks out contact and bangs down low. It reminds me of Pat or Zo. I wish we had the tournament to evaluate some of these guys. I will say Wiseman is a bluechip type of guy but we all know this is a guard's league these days. My biggest issue with Wiseman is it is kinda like drafting a RB or WR #1 overall

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
martin
Posts: 76214
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/24/2020  10:29 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:I am trying to figure out what people see fundamentally in Wiseman that they think he is more talented than someone like Mitch? Help me understand this. I get that he is more muscular.

Mitch is a twitch fast athlete. Hand control grabbing lobs is high. He has demonstrated that he is a defensive player of the year kind of talent. Endless motor.

Mitch does lack fundamentals, late bloomer cause of lack of playing. Zero demonstrated shot. Seems like a worker but really can't tell.

Wiseman has a long way to go to, just like Mitch.

What would convince anyone that Wiseman would be a better big in the NBA than say Onyeka Okongwu, outside of being taller?

Wiseman is a higher end guy than Mitch IMO... I think we are so bad that positions and roster is irrelevant. You take the BPA and go from there. Wiseman was my preseason #1 overall. He was with Penny Hardaway through AAU and came to Memphis and stayed with him. He knows how to play and I think is more complete than Mitch, even though they bring similar stats to the table. I really like how Wiseman seeks out contact and bangs down low. It reminds me of Pat or Zo. I wish we had the tournament to evaluate some of these guys. I will say Wiseman is a bluechip type of guy but we all know this is a guard's league these days. My biggest issue with Wiseman is it is kinda like drafting a RB or WR #1 overall

So that's what I'm trying to understand. How is he a higher end guy? He likes contact and...?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Uptown
Posts: 31322
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

7/24/2020  10:55 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/24/2020  11:16 AM
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:I am trying to figure out what people see fundamentally in Wiseman that they think he is more talented than someone like Mitch? Help me understand this. I get that he is more muscular.

Mitch is a twitch fast athlete. Hand control grabbing lobs is high. He has demonstrated that he is a defensive player of the year kind of talent. Endless motor.

Mitch does lack fundamentals, late bloomer cause of lack of playing. Zero demonstrated shot. Seems like a worker but really can't tell.

Wiseman has a long way to go to, just like Mitch.

What would convince anyone that Wiseman would be a better big in the NBA than say Onyeka Okongwu, outside of being taller?

Wiseman is a higher end guy than Mitch IMO... I think we are so bad that positions and roster is irrelevant. You take the BPA and go from there. Wiseman was my preseason #1 overall. He was with Penny Hardaway through AAU and came to Memphis and stayed with him. He knows how to play and I think is more complete than Mitch, even though they bring similar stats to the table. I really like how Wiseman seeks out contact and bangs down low. It reminds me of Pat or Zo. I wish we had the tournament to evaluate some of these guys. I will say Wiseman is a bluechip type of guy but we all know this is a guard's league these days. My biggest issue with Wiseman is it is kinda like drafting a RB or WR #1 overall

So that's what I'm trying to understand. How is he a higher end guy? He likes contact and...?

The outside shooting, ball handling and offensive moves we watch Mitch perform in summer instagram vids is what Wiseman does in actual games and then some. Its a big jump taking what you learn in training to the actual game. A jump Mitch hasn't made yet and in all honesty, we are not sure he will ever make. Wiseman has already made that jump. Of course, Wiseman still needs a lot more polish but he is a full notch ahead of Mitch on the offensive side of the ball.

Mitch gets his strictly on PNR lobs and put backs. You can legit, throw the ball to Wiseman in the post and he can get you a bucket with his back to the basket or facing up. He's also a threat to get the defender in foul trouble. Mitch is not at this level just yet. With that said, I like Mitch and what he brings to table. I'm not looking to move him, but we are so void of talent, if Wiseman is on the board when he pick, it will be difficult to pass him up...

GustavBahler
Posts: 42797
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

7/24/2020  10:56 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/24/2020  11:05 AM
ankurk wrote:agree 100%
much higher ceiling than mitch
makes mitch tradeable if the right opportunity comes along. until then wiseman/robinson 4/5


Dont know how you can come to this conclusion from that workout clip. Mitch isnt built like Embid, or some of the other bigs. Isnt as fast as Giannis. What Mitch does have, which many bigs dont have at his level, is anticipation. On both ends of the court. Thats how he's able to put on those block parties. How he knows where to be for the monster jam, moving without the ball.

Mitch has set records, gotten the league's attention, in relatively little PT. Cant believe so many posters want to move on to the next shiny object.

TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/24/2020  11:22 AM
I like Wiseman. I think he has the potential to be a Joel Embiid-type player. But the Knicks have needed a top-flight PG for the past 15 years, and I think Mitch is going to be a DeAndre Jordan type center next season. Ball has the potential to be the best PG we have had since Mark Jackson. I think the pick has to be Ball. The only way I draft Wiseman is if I had a trade for Mitch where we move up by trading Mitch and possibly getting Killian Hayes and a future pick. If we came out of the draft with Wiseman and Killian Hayes and a future pick, then I could get behind that move.
Trust the Process
Uptown
Posts: 31322
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

7/24/2020  11:30 AM
TheGame wrote:I like Wiseman. I think he has the potential to be a Joel Embiid-type player. But the Knicks have needed a top-flight PG for the past 15 years, and I think Mitch is going to be a DeAndre Jordan type center next season. Ball has the potential to be the best PG we have had since Mark Jackson. I think the pick has to be Ball. The only way I draft Wiseman is if I had a trade for Mitch where we move up by trading Mitch and possibly getting Killian Hayes and a future pick. If we came out of the draft with Wiseman and Killian Hayes and a future pick, then I could get behind that move.

We need more than just a pg. The cupboard is bare. If Ball is off the board when we pick, I don't want the Knicks to settle for a PG just and leave a more talented prospect on the board because we 'need a pg'.

martin
Posts: 76214
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/24/2020  11:38 AM
Uptown wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:I am trying to figure out what people see fundamentally in Wiseman that they think he is more talented than someone like Mitch? Help me understand this. I get that he is more muscular.

Mitch is a twitch fast athlete. Hand control grabbing lobs is high. He has demonstrated that he is a defensive player of the year kind of talent. Endless motor.

Mitch does lack fundamentals, late bloomer cause of lack of playing. Zero demonstrated shot. Seems like a worker but really can't tell.

Wiseman has a long way to go to, just like Mitch.

What would convince anyone that Wiseman would be a better big in the NBA than say Onyeka Okongwu, outside of being taller?

Wiseman is a higher end guy than Mitch IMO... I think we are so bad that positions and roster is irrelevant. You take the BPA and go from there. Wiseman was my preseason #1 overall. He was with Penny Hardaway through AAU and came to Memphis and stayed with him. He knows how to play and I think is more complete than Mitch, even though they bring similar stats to the table. I really like how Wiseman seeks out contact and bangs down low. It reminds me of Pat or Zo. I wish we had the tournament to evaluate some of these guys. I will say Wiseman is a bluechip type of guy but we all know this is a guard's league these days. My biggest issue with Wiseman is it is kinda like drafting a RB or WR #1 overall

So that's what I'm trying to understand. How is he a higher end guy? He likes contact and...?

The outside shooting, ball handling and offensive moves we watch Mitch perform in summer instagram vids is what Wiseman does in actual games and then some. Its a big jump taking what you learn in training to the actual game. A jump Mitch hasn't made yet and in all honesty, we are not sure he will ever make. Wiseman has already made that jump. Of course, Wiseman still needs a lot more polish but he is a full notch ahead of Mitch on the offensive side of the ball.

Mitch gets his strictly on PNR lobs and put backs. You can legit, throw the ball to Wiseman in the post and he can get you a bucket with his back to the basket or facing up. He's also a threat to get the defender in foul trouble. Mitch is not at this level just yet. With that said, I like Mitch and what he brings to table. I'm not looking to move him, but we are so void of talent, if Wiseman is on the board when he pick, it will be difficult to pass him up...

It's my understanding that Wiseman has played 3 college games? 2 again some low level teams?

Has he really demonstrated much beyond that?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
martin
Posts: 76214
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/24/2020  11:38 AM
Uptown wrote:
TheGame wrote:I like Wiseman. I think he has the potential to be a Joel Embiid-type player. But the Knicks have needed a top-flight PG for the past 15 years, and I think Mitch is going to be a DeAndre Jordan type center next season. Ball has the potential to be the best PG we have had since Mark Jackson. I think the pick has to be Ball. The only way I draft Wiseman is if I had a trade for Mitch where we move up by trading Mitch and possibly getting Killian Hayes and a future pick. If we came out of the draft with Wiseman and Killian Hayes and a future pick, then I could get behind that move.

We need more than just a pg. The cupboard is bare. If Ball is off the board when we pick, I don't want the Knicks to settle for a PG just and leave a more talented prospect on the board because we 'need a pg'.

Same, BPA

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Uptown
Posts: 31322
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

7/24/2020  11:55 AM
martin wrote:
Uptown wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:I am trying to figure out what people see fundamentally in Wiseman that they think he is more talented than someone like Mitch? Help me understand this. I get that he is more muscular.

Mitch is a twitch fast athlete. Hand control grabbing lobs is high. He has demonstrated that he is a defensive player of the year kind of talent. Endless motor.

Mitch does lack fundamentals, late bloomer cause of lack of playing. Zero demonstrated shot. Seems like a worker but really can't tell.

Wiseman has a long way to go to, just like Mitch.

What would convince anyone that Wiseman would be a better big in the NBA than say Onyeka Okongwu, outside of being taller?

Wiseman is a higher end guy than Mitch IMO... I think we are so bad that positions and roster is irrelevant. You take the BPA and go from there. Wiseman was my preseason #1 overall. He was with Penny Hardaway through AAU and came to Memphis and stayed with him. He knows how to play and I think is more complete than Mitch, even though they bring similar stats to the table. I really like how Wiseman seeks out contact and bangs down low. It reminds me of Pat or Zo. I wish we had the tournament to evaluate some of these guys. I will say Wiseman is a bluechip type of guy but we all know this is a guard's league these days. My biggest issue with Wiseman is it is kinda like drafting a RB or WR #1 overall

So that's what I'm trying to understand. How is he a higher end guy? He likes contact and...?

The outside shooting, ball handling and offensive moves we watch Mitch perform in summer instagram vids is what Wiseman does in actual games and then some. Its a big jump taking what you learn in training to the actual game. A jump Mitch hasn't made yet and in all honesty, we are not sure he will ever make. Wiseman has already made that jump. Of course, Wiseman still needs a lot more polish but he is a full notch ahead of Mitch on the offensive side of the ball.

Mitch gets his strictly on PNR lobs and put backs. You can legit, throw the ball to Wiseman in the post and he can get you a bucket with his back to the basket or facing up. He's also a threat to get the defender in foul trouble. Mitch is not at this level just yet. With that said, I like Mitch and what he brings to table. I'm not looking to move him, but we are so void of talent, if Wiseman is on the board when he pick, it will be difficult to pass him up...

It's my understanding that Wiseman has played 3 college games? 2 again some low level teams?

Has he really demonstrated much beyond that?

It's a small sample size, agreed. But, I have seen Wiseman catch the ball in the post, square-up and knock down 12 footers. I've seen him attempt jump hooks, and he is capable of putting the ball on the floor and make himself a threat offensively. We have yet to see Mitch attempt any of these skill sets in actual games.

With that said, I like Mitch better on the defensive end. Better lateral quickness on the perimeter and better shot blocker mainly because he uses his left hand to block shots.

Uptown
Posts: 31322
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

7/24/2020  11:56 AM
Starting at the 4:45 mark, you get to see some of his potential offensively...

NYKBocker
Posts: 38411
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
7/24/2020  1:03 PM
Uptown wrote:Starting at the 4:45 mark, you get to see some of his potential offensively...

Looking at that, I see Mitch doing the same things.

You get pick 1 u take this guy and it’s not close

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy