[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Kyle Kuzma?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
GustavBahler
Posts: 42801
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186
1/8/2020  12:18 PM
Worth pursuing? Had to deal with a foot injury (Team USA?) hasnt played well. Maybe time and a change of scenery will help.
AUTOADVERT
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39877
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
1/8/2020  12:56 PM
I read his offense has suffered due to PG play. His split with Rondo on and off the court are drastic. Still his defense is trash. Morris is better right now. I'm meh on Kuzma. I'd understand if we traded for him, but I wouldn't give up a lot. Maybe that freaky hair cut is playing a lot in my opinion of him right now lol
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
1/8/2020  3:14 PM
I am warming to the idea of Kuzma. Let's say the interest is real in Morris and the Lakers and Knicks work out some sort of deal. I think I like Kuzma and Randle as starters and Knox developing behind them has some long term potential. Morris is better, maybe they value the leadership, but I just think they have to free up minutes so Knox can become whatever he's going to become
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/8/2020  3:18 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/8/2020  3:20 PM
The money diff will be an issue. We have to take back to make it work with Morris.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/8/2020  3:44 PM
we have 8 fwds already
ES
dwiley20
Posts: 20756
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2014
Member: #5755
1/8/2020  4:09 PM
Just seeing this but definitely yea for Marcus Morris
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/8/2020  4:56 PM
knicks1248 wrote:we have 8 fwds already

Not that you can given the money, but conceptually Morris is a forward and Kuzma is a forward.
Would be still have 8.

We good now?
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801
1/8/2020  5:49 PM
So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748
1/8/2020  7:05 PM
Hello no. He sucks. I'd much rather ride out with Knox.
The Future is Bright!
GustavBahler
Posts: 42801
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186
1/8/2020  7:21 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/8/2020  7:22 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

Knox isnt ready for prime time. We would be trading for a much younger player, with time to get better defensively. Wasnt really a priority in LA before Lebron got there. Moat of their offense is James and AD. Kuzma can get buckets, we need that badly. If he puts up giod numbers, but still no D, and Knox ia ready to start, you trade Kuzma.

Having said that the reasons given for passing on him are legit. Believe his first few years on an F'ed up Laker team didnt do him any favors.
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
1/8/2020  7:59 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

Knox isnt ready for prime time. We would be trading for a much younger player, with time to get better defensively. Wasnt really a priority in LA before Lebron got there. Moat of their offense is James and AD. Kuzma can get buckets, we need that badly. If he puts up giod numbers, but still no D, and Knox ia ready to start, you trade Kuzma.

Having said that the reasons given for passing on him are legit. Believe his first few years on an F'ed up Laker team didnt do him any favors.

Lakers need a stretch forward to shoot better than What Kuz is to now. They need to open the middle for Davis. Morris would improve that.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/8/2020  8:07 PM
Nalod wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

Knox isnt ready for prime time. We would be trading for a much younger player, with time to get better defensively. Wasnt really a priority in LA before Lebron got there. Moat of their offense is James and AD. Kuzma can get buckets, we need that badly. If he puts up giod numbers, but still no D, and Knox ia ready to start, you trade Kuzma.

Having said that the reasons given for passing on him are legit. Believe his first few years on an F'ed up Laker team didnt do him any favors.

Lakers need a stretch forward to shoot better than What Kuz is to now. They need to open the middle for Davis. Morris would improve that.

Far more interested in just signing Brandon Ingram this Summer..... and I’m not even 100% sold on that.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
1/10/2020  2:31 PM
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

Knox isnt ready for prime time. We would be trading for a much younger player, with time to get better defensively. Wasnt really a priority in LA before Lebron got there. Moat of their offense is James and AD. Kuzma can get buckets, we need that badly. If he puts up giod numbers, but still no D, and Knox ia ready to start, you trade Kuzma.

Having said that the reasons given for passing on him are legit. Believe his first few years on an F'ed up Laker team didnt do him any favors.

Lakers need a stretch forward to shoot better than What Kuz is to now. They need to open the middle for Davis. Morris would improve that.

Far more interested in just signing Brandon Ingram this Summer..... and I’m not even 100% sold on that.

Ingram is guaranteed the max... Kuzma is still on his rookie deal for another year, biggest bang for your buck

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
fwk00
Posts: 22163
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048
1/11/2020  12:54 AM
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

Knox isnt ready for prime time. We would be trading for a much younger player, with time to get better defensively. Wasnt really a priority in LA before Lebron got there. Moat of their offense is James and AD. Kuzma can get buckets, we need that badly. If he puts up giod numbers, but still no D, and Knox ia ready to start, you trade Kuzma.

Having said that the reasons given for passing on him are legit. Believe his first few years on an F'ed up Laker team didnt do him any favors.

Lakers need a stretch forward to shoot better than What Kuz is to now. They need to open the middle for Davis. Morris would improve that.

Far more interested in just signing Brandon Ingram this Summer..... and I’m not even 100% sold on that.

Ingram sounded like a happy country boy in NO. Given he didn't care for LA, what are the chances he'd blosson in NYC. Seems like a cultural mismatch.
fwk00
Posts: 22163
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048
1/11/2020  12:56 AM
EnySpree wrote:
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

Knox isnt ready for prime time. We would be trading for a much younger player, with time to get better defensively. Wasnt really a priority in LA before Lebron got there. Moat of their offense is James and AD. Kuzma can get buckets, we need that badly. If he puts up giod numbers, but still no D, and Knox ia ready to start, you trade Kuzma.

Having said that the reasons given for passing on him are legit. Believe his first few years on an F'ed up Laker team didnt do him any favors.

Lakers need a stretch forward to shoot better than What Kuz is to now. They need to open the middle for Davis. Morris would improve that.

Far more interested in just signing Brandon Ingram this Summer..... and I’m not even 100% sold on that.

Ingram is guaranteed the max... Kuzma is still on his rookie deal for another year, biggest bang for your buck

I'd prefer Kuzma to Randall. At least Kuzma, can handle big city expectations.
GustavBahler
Posts: 42801
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186
2/5/2020  2:35 PM
https://www.sny.tv/knicks/news/knicks-and-lakers-have-talked-kyle-kuzma-trade-but-two-team-deal-could-be-complicated/312655126
fishmike
Posts: 53828
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/5/2020  2:43 PM
TPercy wrote:Hello no. He sucks. I'd much rather ride out with Knox.

this, and our guy is like 5 years younger
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
houston20
Posts: 20484
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/18/2019
Member: #8797
2/5/2020  2:58 PM
I really doubt the lakers make any trades before the deadline i think they like there team the way it is.
Knixkik
Posts: 35448
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
2/5/2020  2:58 PM
He only makes sense if you move both Morris and Randle. In theory he's a solid 4 next to a wing like Barrett. He's young and a proven 18-20 ppg guy. But you need to move the other guys and commit to surrounding Barrett, Kuzma, and Mitch with a backcourt loaded with shooting and playmaking.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39877
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
2/5/2020  3:08 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/5/2020  3:09 PM
EnySpree wrote:
Allanfan20 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:So we give up our most valuable trade chip playing the best ball of his career for a injured player who doesn't play defense and needs a change of scenery, because the best team in the West isn't good enough for him?


Then again we ARE the Knicks.

Knox isnt ready for prime time. We would be trading for a much younger player, with time to get better defensively. Wasnt really a priority in LA before Lebron got there. Moat of their offense is James and AD. Kuzma can get buckets, we need that badly. If he puts up giod numbers, but still no D, and Knox ia ready to start, you trade Kuzma.

Having said that the reasons given for passing on him are legit. Believe his first few years on an F'ed up Laker team didnt do him any favors.

Lakers need a stretch forward to shoot better than What Kuz is to now. They need to open the middle for Davis. Morris would improve that.

Far more interested in just signing Brandon Ingram this Summer..... and I’m not even 100% sold on that.

Ingram is guaranteed the max... Kuzma is still on his rookie deal for another year, biggest bang for your buck


Kuzma is already like 25 and we will have to pay after next season. Possible THJ situation...if he even gets to that level. Kuz has been straight booty this season. I'd rather go with a Shamet, pick centered deal with the Clippers.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Kyle Kuzma?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy