Clean wrote: Trading for Rose was one of Phils most puzzling decisions.
I actually think it makes a ton of sense .... if you only look at it from what serves/served Phil Jackson best ( and not what was best for the entire team and franchise)
Phil Jackson THOUGHT he was getting the keys to the kingdom. Elder Buss died, he was going to marry the daughter, and since the daughter only ran the business side, he'd have de facto control of one of the league's signature franchises. The crown jewel. Instead that's not how the power game played out, and he took a soft landing and soft retirement in NY. If he failed, which was likely, he could blame Dolan and the "Clumsy Roster"
The trade for Rose and signing Noah IMHO were moves from a guy wanting to get to the 8th seed for ONE YEAR, at the COST OF THE NEXT FOUR TO FIVE YEARS, because he wouldn't be there to eat the cost later. He wanted to say he made the playoffs and that would salve some of the hit to his legacy at the end of his career. But his legacy and wealth was already established before he came to NY.
Jackson was no less selfish with personnel than Melo was selfish with the ball on the court. They BOTH needed to go.
There is no way in hell that trading for Rose and signing Noah would approximate good market based decisions. Any entry level NBA intern could see the ticking timebomb in those decisions the day they happened.
Melo doesn't give a **** about the Knicks
Jackson didn't give a **** about the Knicks.
This is what happens in bad franchises, everyone has an agenda except just doing what is right for the long term good for winning. Sam Hinkie did it, and he got shamed, attacked in public and canned for it.
Bill Parcells said it best, you can do your job, or you try to keep your job, but doing your job means you are taking risks that might end up costing you the job overall, but you can't think like that. You have to focus on winning.