We signed Houston to 5 years $35mm. The cap was 24.3mm that year. Houston's first year was $5mm. That counted as 20% of the cap. Houston's last year was $9mm. That counted as 25% of the cap.
THjr's deal is worth $18mm a year. Thats 18% of the cap next year. Less than we signed Houston for.
They were the same age (24).
Houston had a TS% of .576
Hardaway had a TS% of .568
Houston had a WS/48 of .576
Hardaway had a WS/48 of .568
I dont think there is any doubt Houston was more productive at the same age, but not by much. Also Houston's contract was a year longer.
Obviously Houston turned out to be a good #2 scorer. THjr's hope is based on a sample size of about 30ish games. That is the risk. Its a legit risk. Overpaying for FAs always is. But this is not the headscratching move some are making it out to be, not by a long shot.
Using 18% of your cap on a guy who is slated to be a starter and your #2 or #3 scoring option and his 24 years old. Thats a terrible mind numbingly bad contract? Hard to see that. I think this deserves some perspective. Hopefully this is it.
All that being said I think they match.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs