yea... I mean this is kind of self explanatory no?
Good Melo: takes tons of shots. Holds ball. Makes some plays. Dominates offense. Hits big shots.
Bad Melo: takes tons of shots. Holds ball. Makes some plays. Dominates offense. Hits big shots.
Good Noah: Moves ball, elite passing big man, great defender, excellent rebounder, doesnt need ball to be effective.
Bad Noah: Moves ball, elite passing big man, great defender, excellent rebounder, doesnt need ball to be effective.
Pretty simple. Bad Melo is a team cancer and a coach killer. Bad Noah is just not a good basketball player, but has no negative impact on the team.
Noah's contract stinks, but he's either dead weight or he helps us. Bad Melo will hurt the youth development and as he's disgruntled will seek allies and be a divisive force. That is the downside which we have seen on more than one occasion. Can the Knick's afford that?
I dont know what the right play is... but I do know there is a clear downside/backfire to Melo that doesnt exist with Noah.
Noah has a lot of pride. I expect him to be able to help, if only in a limited role. Ideally we start him next to KP, he's a ball mover, defender and a ton setter and we get 65-70 games and 18-20mpg from him. If we get that you will see the positives he brings.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs