HofstraBBall wrote:nixluva wrote:I'm not sure how the so called damage Phil did impacted what the Knicks will do. Melo was always going to be difficult to move. The Knicks weren't really going into this summer expecting to make a Superteam. The Knicks are on their own timeline so mentioning Minnesota isn't really the point is it?There's literally no reason to panic or be despondent at this stage. The Knicks have to go thru the process of GROWING OUR OWN STARS!!! You seem to be stuck in Quick Fix Mode!
Agree. Hard to compare. The point, I think is that Minny has done a much better job bringing in pieces around their young star. One thing that was a miss and will have short term impact and possible long term impact, if Frank turns out to be a bust, is to draft someone in who is not ready to start from day 1. Think Monk would have been a good SG and could have started right away. As I think Smith Jr. would be able to start as well. Will be dissapointed if Frank is not a starter.
Players like Monk are the easiest to acquire in the NBA. Players like Frank who can play defense, shoot the 3, and offer play making is way harder.
Guys like Lavine, Booker, Wiggins, Russell, Oladipo(magic), Gordan(pre Houston role player) all put up nice numbers on teams that were trash. Their defense is poor though, their win shares is poor, they don't really make anyone better which is why their teams were losing. You are right that maybe you would be able to fool teams into giving up Jimmy Butlers for them though based off their stats though. But in terms of building a winner. They usually turn into role players off the bench ala Gordan. Or have careers like Rudy Gay.
Disclaimer. Will give Monk the benefit of doubt since he has yet to play in the NBA. But I like Frank's foundation as a player better.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.