would be the best defensive guard on the team.

He’s 6-foot-5, has close to a 7-foot wingspan, has massive hands, and is an impressive leaper.

newyorknewyork wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

blkexec wrote:what if he's the next charlie ward...with lock down potential as a pg.

would be the best defensive guard on the team.

Ward was steady, maybe one of the steadiest PGs the team has ever had. Still hoping for someone who moves the needle more. If Frank is a project, he's a long term one with a franchise that doesn't really do long term. And as Nix said, his ceiling is questionable, considering current events in Europe.

If Phil lands a 2nd first rounder. He might get away with taking a project like Frank. His frame also looks like it can and will add weight. He probably ends up on the wing and becomes similar to Batum when all said and done.

nixluva wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

blkexec wrote:what if he's the next charlie ward...with lock down potential as a pg.

would be the best defensive guard on the team.

Ward was steady, maybe one of the steadiest PGs the team has ever had. Still hoping for someone who moves the needle more. If Frank is a project, he's a long term one with a franchise that doesn't really do long term. And as Nix said, his ceiling is questionable, considering current events in Europe.

If Phil lands a 2nd first rounder. He might get away with taking a project like Frank. His frame also looks like it can and will add weight. He probably ends up on the wing and becomes similar to Batum when all said and done.

Good point. Phil could take a risk and cover himself with a player that is a solid lock to produce. I think Nitty ends up as a SG with passing. He's going to fill out from how he looks. He doesn't look extremely quick with the ball. Still could be a good overall player but I don't see a star.

GustavBahler wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

blkexec wrote:what if he's the next charlie ward...with lock down potential as a pg.

would be the best defensive guard on the team.

Ward was steady, maybe one of the steadiest PGs the team has ever had. Still hoping for someone who moves the needle more. If Frank is a project, he's a long term one with a franchise that doesn't really do long term. And as Nix said, his ceiling is questionable, considering current events in Europe.

If Phil lands a 2nd first rounder. He might get away with taking a project like Frank. His frame also looks like it can and will add weight. He probably ends up on the wing and becomes similar to Batum when all said and done.

Would have no problem with Phil taking him in the second round. As an 8 pick, a PG, I'd want to see more from a player from Europe.

I dont think we should strictly view him as a PG. He has measurables that make him cappable of guarding 3 positions and being a monster rebounder on the wing or at guard. Adding weight with NBA weight training to absorb contact and finish with a 7ft wing span could make him a stud wing. He is viewed as a lotto pick in a pretty deep draft class. Most likely because he also has discipline to his game to go with his measurments.

WaltLongmire wrote:Crazy wingspan and large hands...

I find it impressive that he has gotten his jumper in order so quickly.

Large hands, especially, are not always a plus for a jump shot, and the combination of that with his wingspan would be even more of a hindrance to developing a good shot from my perspective.

If he fills out, you are looking at a guy who should be able to defend at the 1-3 spots. I tend to believe that though he is a combo guard, he'll end up getting most of his play at SG.

Wonder if he has any growth left in his body.

newyorknewyork wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

blkexec wrote:what if he's the next charlie ward...with lock down potential as a pg.

would be the best defensive guard on the team.

Ward was steady, maybe one of the steadiest PGs the team has ever had. Still hoping for someone who moves the needle more. If Frank is a project, he's a long term one with a franchise that doesn't really do long term. And as Nix said, his ceiling is questionable, considering current events in Europe.

If Phil lands a 2nd first rounder. He might get away with taking a project like Frank. His frame also looks like it can and will add weight. He probably ends up on the wing and becomes similar to Batum when all said and done.

Would have no problem with Phil taking him in the second round. As an 8 pick, a PG, I'd want to see more from a player from Europe.

I dont think we should strictly view him as a PG. He has measurables that make him cappable of guarding 3 positions and being a monster rebounder on the wing or at guard. Adding weight with NBA weight training to absorb contact and finish with a 7ft wing span could make him a stud wing. He is viewed as a lotto pick in a pretty deep draft class. Most likely because he also has discipline to his game to go with his measurments.

Fine points, but he's a ways off from possibly putting all those qualities together. Usually a player like Frank also has above average foot speed for a wing in their resume. From what Ive read and seen, that's not the case. Too many question marks IMO for a top ten, first round pick.

My player comparisons

Smith - Dennis Shroedor type/level of player if he develops. 15 points, 6 assists a game.
Ntilinkina - Marcus Smart type/level player of player if he develops. More impact than basic stats can show.
Monk - Better, smarter JR Smith unless he develops point skills, in which case he can be even better. 18 points a night.

All obvious if they develop, avoid injuries.

I think the most certain to get to his upside is Monk, because his NBA level skills are already there and he has the athleticism. He may need a few years to get better at certain things and to learn how to adjust, become consistent.

But that doesn't mean you take Monk. That's why Phil and Gaines are there. Do interviews. Work outs.

I trust we will choose the right guy of the three guards if the draft goes as rumored.

My order would be

Fultz
Ball
Jackson
Fox
Isaac
Tatum
Monk
Smith
Ntilinkina
Lauri

The top 10 is really nice this year. Of the 10, I tend to like Fultz, Ball, Jackson, Isaac, Monk more than the rest. Just on instinct.

With the way our team is set up with developing players, Monk or Smith would really blend in nice with a rebuild.

All 1-2 years into league:

Porzingis
Hernangomez/NDour
Kuzminskas
Baker
Randle

Add a Monk or Smith, now you have some perimeter talent to go with the more talented big man talent you have. NDour/Kuz/Randle all likely backups in the making, and Baker can be a 5th option starter if the rest of the starting lineup has plenty of scoring.

Which "big 3" is best in a rebuild year?

KP/Willy/Monk (Could get you 20/15/15 each?)
KP/Willy/Smith (Could get you 20/15/10-5 each?)

I think Monk is our best safest bet. I think he can give this team 13-15 points right away in the Courtney Lee role. Trade Lee for a young player or a draft pick. If we trade Melo for a draft pick, some young players, you are likely a 25 win team next year. You want some young guys that can score, and are exciting to watch develop. I tend to prefer Smith or Monk for that reason. I think they fit well with KP/Willy. Of the two, I think Smith's injury past makes Monk the wiser choice.

I really would take a chance on Frank, but with a second pick. I wouldn't use 8 on him. However if Phil takes him. I reserve judgement. Phil does the interviews and the scouting as well. He knows what players play winning basketball. My instinct just tells me give Hornachel a player like Monk, he will get freedom to score/shoot and run the wings, he will be exciting to watch and also play well under Horny. Small chance because of the Kentucky connection we keep Rose and have a really interesting backcourt of Monk/Rose with KP/Willy upfront and a young athletic two way wing from a Melo trade at 3.

nyknickzingis wrote:Reminds me more of a Marcus Smart down the road than a top 3 option.
All about what you want.
Smart is a heck of a player and guy you need on a good team. Top 3 option he isn't.
Monk or Smith if they develop, especially Monk, is likely a top 3 option scorer on a team in the league.

My player comparisons

Smith - Dennis Shroedor type/level of player if he develops. 15 points, 6 assists a game.
Ntilinkina - Marcus Smart type/level player of player if he develops. More impact than basic stats can show.
Monk - Better, smarter JR Smith unless he develops point skills, in which case he can be even better. 18 points a night.

All obvious if they develop, avoid injuries.

I think the most certain to get to his upside is Monk, because his NBA level skills are already there and he has the athleticism. He may need a few years to get better at certain things and to learn how to adjust, become consistent.

But that doesn't mean you take Monk. That's why Phil and Gaines are there. Do interviews. Work outs.

I trust we will choose the right guy of the three guards if the draft goes as rumored.

My order would be

Fultz
Ball
Jackson
Fox
Isaac
Tatum
Monk
Smith
Ntilinkina
Lauri

The top 10 is really nice this year. Of the 10, I tend to like Fultz, Ball, Jackson, Isaac, Monk more than the rest. Just on instinct.

With the way our team is set up with developing players, Monk or Smith would really blend in nice with a rebuild.

All 1-2 years into league:

Porzingis
Hernangomez/NDour
Kuzminskas
Baker
Randle

Add a Monk or Smith, now you have some perimeter talent to go with the more talented big man talent you have. NDour/Kuz/Randle all likely backups in the making, and Baker can be a 5th option starter if the rest of the starting lineup has plenty of scoring.

Which "big 3" is best in a rebuild year?

KP/Willy/Monk (Could get you 20/15/15 each?)
KP/Willy/Smith (Could get you 20/15/10-5 each?)

I think Monk is our best safest bet. I think he can give this team 13-15 points right away in the Courtney Lee role. Trade Lee for a young player or a draft pick. If we trade Melo for a draft pick, some young players, you are likely a 25 win team next year. You want some young guys that can score, and are exciting to watch develop. I tend to prefer Smith or Monk for that reason. I think they fit well with KP/Willy. Of the two, I think Smith's injury past makes Monk the wiser choice.

I really would take a chance on Frank, but with a second pick. I wouldn't use 8 on him. However if Phil takes him. I reserve judgement. Phil does the interviews and the scouting as well. He knows what players play winning basketball. My instinct just tells me give Hornachel a player like Monk, he will get freedom to score/shoot and run the wings, he will be exciting to watch and also play well under Horny. Small chance because of the Kentucky connection we keep Rose and have a really interesting backcourt of Monk/Rose with KP/Willy upfront and a young athletic two way wing from a Melo trade at 3.

Looking at Monk his numbers does not really translate into a quality player. He will have to work very hard to become a great offensive player but even then he has work to do improving his defense, rebounding, and passing.