| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
Chandler
Posts: 26898 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
fwk00 wrote:The other interpretation of this question is whether or not the NTC even matters. There is a very, very small market for Melo and PJ has taken a lot of heat for his previous trades. Its already been established at the February trade deadline that the Knicks aren't giving Melo away. True and add ego. I think the sad reality for us is that the top teams don't want him, nor do his friends. (Too expensive for his declining skills). This is the artifact of a CAP. Without a cap some team would add. With a more flexible CBA where he could be traded w let's say a current market rate for the cap figure he could be traded. But carrying the cap number of the original deal is killer Makes market inefficient. Not the way it works in the real world. One thing I hope we don't do is implied in the original post. Do nothing with a "win now" bias We need to build. Not milk the last few buckets of a fading star (5)(7)
|
|
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 2/2/2004 Member: #581 USA |
Chandler wrote:fwk00 wrote:The other interpretation of this question is whether or not the NTC even matters. There is a very, very small market for Melo and PJ has taken a lot of heat for his previous trades. Its already been established at the February trade deadline that the Knicks aren't giving Melo away. In the real world, an employer can't even trade you to a different organization anyway! Once they give you a guaranteed contract, they're stuck with you unless you seriously breach the contract. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
While its a possibility it doesnt really make sense for anyone. Does Melo really want to play for Phil's Knicks? I mean even if its out of spite think it through... it will not be a good environment and its really important for Melo to be liked and wanted and valued. There is no, zilch, zero upside for Melo to stick it out here for any reason. Not when he could go to either LA team.
I think the worst case is if this thing drags on and Knicks have to take a really bad deal because they cant stomach cutting him "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
Bonn1997 wrote:Chandler wrote:fwk00 wrote:The other interpretation of this question is whether or not the NTC even matters. There is a very, very small market for Melo and PJ has taken a lot of heat for his previous trades. Its already been established at the February trade deadline that the Knicks aren't giving Melo away. It's funny, at the start of every season, Melo's the one pulling everyone together, including the youngsters. But that doesn't count. During the season, our unicorn practically jerks off over Melo every chance he gets. Is this how a budding diva would act? Doubtful. Divas act like Rose; sullen, quiet, a few occasionally weird drama queen miscues before and during the season. But that doesn't count in Melo's favor either. Actually, the "Zinger Zings the Exit Meeting of Zen" gets laid at the feet of this board's favorite DOUCHE, too. Why would Melo drop his NTC? He's a businessman. He's just turned 33. He's got the max contract. He's not going to be playing with Lebron. And no other team is going to swallow that contract. The current owner sucks his dick. Which means he can play internet cutie pies with his ringbearing Prez all year long. No biggie; if anything, it's free publicity for the "brand". Would I like the DOUCHE to play defense? Surely. But I might be the only "knick fan" who can look at what we were before Melo got here, and before Chief Triangle Genius took the reins and did a minor Hinkie to the franchise, and appreciate some value. Did we win a chip? No, but the Melo reign of terror got us to the playoffs, singlehandedly, once playing with some of the absolute lowest of shit to ever don the uniform, once with a crew of hobbled geriatrics, and once with a pair of jv-class, one-season wonders who wilted pathetically in the playoffs. Oh look, the NTC is still there. Keep wishing fellas. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
jrodmc wrote:why do you keep calling Melo a douche?Bonn1997 wrote:Chandler wrote:fwk00 wrote:The other interpretation of this question is whether or not the NTC even matters. There is a very, very small market for Melo and PJ has taken a lot of heat for his previous trades. Its already been established at the February trade deadline that the Knicks aren't giving Melo away. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
Chandler
Posts: 26898 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
Bonn1997 wrote:Chandler wrote:fwk00 wrote:The other interpretation of this question is whether or not the NTC even matters. There is a very, very small market for Melo and PJ has taken a lot of heat for his previous trades. Its already been established at the February trade deadline that the Knicks aren't giving Melo away. what point are you trying to make? The issue is if your real market value is let's say 17 million and you're in a world of the current CAP, you create a market inefficiency. One team wants to trade you at 17 and another team would accept you at 17 but the rule prohibit the transfer: rules say transfer has to be 30 million. That's a market inefficiency. Are you disputing that? The disgusting thing about the situation is there are plenty of solutions that could allow this transfer, and still ensure the player gets his original bargain -- e.g., trading team pays the extra 13 million but doesn't count on cap. There are many teams besides the Knicks that have been slammed by this inefficiency. SOmetimes it's because it was a purely bad deal, sometimes the player's game declines for whatever reason including aggregation of injuries, rule changes, whatever. and regarding your "serious breach" I think you meant material breach. And if you're going to play "lawyer" keep in mint that in the real world there are also specific performance clauses which would specify what the performer is supposed to do, and if he/she doesn't he is liable, e.g., show up and perform at the concert or we can hold you liable for our lost profits/damages. Not sure if you conveniently forgot about that, whether you just didn't know, or whether you're just trying to be antagonistic smarty-pants. The CBA has problems and it's affecting the NBA's products. Tons of mediocrity, limited ability to change via acquisition (if that's what a team wants to do), creation of super teams because of multi-million players who no longer need/want to chase last dollars and instead want to join a super team for an increasing hollow trophy. Sand-bagging during the season by said super teams etc. And a guaranteed contract structure which is out of touch with the values of its fanbase. Fans are sick and tired of seeing players get the super contract and then turn into somebody else. When they see a person making super money, they don't want to see someone dogging it, undermining coaches and management, or even declining. They know if it were them in their jobs doing the same stuff (making a fraction of the money) they'd be in the soup. (5)(7)
|
|
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/29/2003 Member: #411 USA |
A NTC is not a must play contract.
If he wants to stay then he must accept his new role coming off the bench as a scorer for quick offense. He may play 10 mins one night and 30 the next. It all depends if his shot is falling. That's it. I would think He will want to leave about a month into that. |
|
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/8/2015 Member: #6207 |
I think you see what we saw towards the end of the season.
Less minutes. Lots of "rest" games. Even on good terms and if we wanted him to stay, we should be using him as a veteran not the guy you rely on every night to carry you. |
|
reub
Posts: 21836 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2016 Member: #6227 |
Listen, we need to do this right. We shouldn't trade O'Quinn, who is coming into his own and is multi-faceted. We shouldn't trade Lee either (unless it's necessary to bring in Rubio). We shouldn't give Melo away. If we can acquire Rubio through a DRose sign and trade our team gets a thousand times better. And right away. Then take the BPA in the draft (DSJr, Frank, Collins, Mitchell, I don't care as long as he's the most talented). Acquire another first by taking on one salary (hopefully Harkless) and draft another young stud (could be Kennard or Swanigan?). And grab Frank Mason or Frank Jackson in the 2nd round. Rubio Bench: O'Quinn, Noah, Baker, Holiday, Harkless, Smith or Ntilikina, Swanigan or Kennard, Mason, Thomas, Kuz, Randall, NDour, Plumlee, Sasha That's a much better team with depth and lots of youth. |
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
EnySpree wrote:We are clearly rebuilding.... Melo hasn't already shown you that he can't get big name players to come to New York?? He hasn't been able to get any significant players to come here in the 8 years he's been here so not sure how anyone can think that might be able to change now after a disastrous season on and off the court and with us only having around $19 mil to spend. If he does stay then he stays and if i were J.Hornacek or Phil i'd tell Melo that there will be a very good chance that he'll be coming off the bench as our 6th man/scorer off the bench and if Melo doesn't mind that then it's time to just throw our hands up and give up on trading him and still build the team around KP. Then in two years when he's off the books we hope the young guys are ready to take that next step and keep building from there. We could actually have an interesting lineup next year even if Melo stays. PG--D.Smith |
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
Stats are important for Melo so yes he will waive the NTC. If he comes off the bench his brand suffers another thing that he doesn't want. He joins a winning team and his brand gets stronger. The situation is more profitable if he waives his NTC.
|
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
fwk00 wrote:The other interpretation of this question is whether or not the NTC even matters. There is a very, very small market for Melo and PJ has taken a lot of heat for his previous trades. Its already been established at the February trade deadline that the Knicks aren't giving Melo away. 100% accurate, It's too many hurdles right now to even think about trading him 1)no contender can fit him under their cap without depleting their depth I'm starting to think it was part of phils mind games, because it just seem incredible tough to move this guy, and make no mistake, I could careless if he goes or stays, the only thing im concern about is adding more salary, or replacing him with some BS 10 ppg role player ES
|
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
knicks1248 wrote:fwk00 wrote:The other interpretation of this question is whether or not the NTC even matters. There is a very, very small market for Melo and PJ has taken a lot of heat for his previous trades. Its already been established at the February trade deadline that the Knicks aren't giving Melo away. I can't see any destination but Cleveland for Melo. |