I think the reason they are looking for PGs in their early workouts, is because they might pick a sleeper in Isaac and get a PG in the 2nd round. A poor mans Kevin Durant.

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/19403402/potential-2017-nba-draft-steals

1. Jonathan Isaac, SF, 6-foot-11, 205, Florida State (age on draft day: 20)
Chad Ford Big Board rank: 6
ESPN Analytics draft model rank: 1
Isaac has the top projected statistical plus-minus (SPM) for his first five years in the NBA, according to our model, which gives him a 64 percent chance to play at the level of a bona fide NBA starter or better. Isaac has the third-best adjusted defensive rebounding percentage in this draft class and a 55 percent adjusted effective field goal percentage, which is as good as any other small forward in this draft class. His college stats are most similar to those of Otto Porter, who was selected No. 3 by the Washington Wizards in 2013 and was a key piece for a team that finished a win away from the Eastern Conference finals this season.

It is unlikely that Isaac will work his way into the top three, but at No. 4, the Phoenix Suns could get a top-quality player if Isaac is available.

2. Malik Monk, SG, 6-3, 185, Kentucky (age on draft day: 19)
Chad Ford Big Board rank: 7
ESPN Analytics draft model rank: 3
Our data has shown guards to be more difficult to project than big men at the next level, as some guards are able to transfer their shooting to the NBA while others possess shooting flaws that aren't exposed until they play against bigger and faster defenses in the NBA. That said, the model gives Monk just a 25 percent chance of being a bust, which is the second-smallest figure in this draft for a guard after Lonzo Ball. Compared to the other top-60 players on Ford's Big Board, Monk is unique because he lacks any glaring weaknesses statistically, but the only statistic in which he really stands out is his having a low turnover percentage.

Ford has the Philadelphia 76ers taking Monk at No. 3 in his latest mock draft, and our model agrees that he is one of the three best players in the draft.

3. Lauri Markkanen, PF, 7-0, 230, Arizona (age on draft day: 19)
Chad Ford Big Board rank: 10
ESPN Analytics draft model rank: 4
Markkanen is a 7-footer who has the highest adjusted percentage on 3-point and free throw attempts of any forward in this draft class. He doesn't have the best rebounding percentages compared to other big men in the class, but he has the outside game that is sought from bigs in the modern NBA. Markkanen may not have the upside of other talent but is the second-least likely to be a bust, according to our model -- his college stats compare favorably to those of 11-time all-star Chris Bosh.

Markkanen may not be a splashy pick at No. 5, but he could be a good fit there for a Sacramento Kings team that is trying to fill the void left by DeMarcus Cousins.

He certainly fits into the mould of players Phil described he is looking for- smart, two way players who are unselfish and not obsessed with scoring. One of the scouting reports said he's more fluid than an explosive athlete, which hopefully reduces his risk of injury.
Here's a vid for his attitude & character:

Highlights:

and breakdowns (draft express haven't updated their yet):

Willy
KP
Isaac
Lee
Holiday (?)

If we miss out on him because of Ndour's jumper I'm going to be highly upset.

PhilinLA wrote:I like him fine, but our best player is a 4, and so is Isaac. We need someone to get the ball to KP and Willy, thus a guard. Or, if the guards are gone, we should take a 3.

smackeddog wrote:I like Isaac a lot- attitude and skill set. He's from NY too. Only issues I have is (assuming we don't trade him), does he fit well next to KP?

"When you are short on talent period on your roster, just get the best player you can, figure out the rest later." - Zack Lowe, rephrasing a common trade/draft/value truism held by Don Nelson.

Issac's combination of skills is just downright bizarre ( in a good way) . Even in the NBA, where you have anomalies in terms of size and speed, Issac just shouldn't be able to move like he does at his size and length.

I don't think he will be an offensive force. I think what he's done so far, a lot will be neutralized at the next level, but his all around game can really help a team. His length on the perimeter can be pretty lethal.

Massive boom potential. Massive bust potential.

At #8, if he's there, to me, it's worth the dice roll. He won't likely be there at #8 though.

CrushAlot wrote:I think just based on his defensive potential he would be a great pick. Putting him next to KP in the front court would be awesome. Minimally he should make some all defensive teams. I don't think e will be there when the Knicks pick but he would be a great guy to get.

I love his combination of physical talent and skills. He's very active on the defensive end which this team desperately needs. Quickness and Agility at his size is elite. Just depends on how things shake out.

nixluva wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:I think just based on his defensive potential he would be a great pick. Putting him next to KP in the front court would be awesome. Minimally he should make some all defensive teams. I don't think e will be there when the Knicks pick but he would be a great guy to get.

I love his combination of physical talent and skills. He's very active on the defensive end which this team desperately needs. Quickness and Agility at his size is elite. Just depends on how things shake out.