| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
mlby1215
Posts: 20314 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/16/2017 Member: #6486 |
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
Hell no.
¿ △ ?
|
|
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/12/2004 Member: #696 |
No.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/
We got a ringer.
|
|
Kemet
Posts: 22087 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/23/2015 Member: #6148 |
Depends .. on whats best for KP? or whats best for Knicks fans?
|
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
I'd consider it for Fultz only
|
|
Moonangie
Posts: 24767 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 7/9/2009 Member: #2788 |
This is some crazy shyte. Trade your cornerstone? Priceless.
|
|
Knixkik
Posts: 35753 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
NO way. You fix the issues at hand and move forward and build around him.
|
|
Nalod
Posts: 72093 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
Not sure he regressed skill wise and some stats were up. But he played just 66 games and is not holding up to prime time minutes.
He has to let his body grow naturally or big problems come up. Not sure I'd trade him for a pick, but a scenario of getting two starters, one that is young and rising allstar. Is that fair? not sure for the other team but his would have to be a team that really wants KP. Scenario, say Lakers are inline to sign Paul George as a free agent. Just hypothetical, just stay with it. Well that might put Brandon Ingram on the bench, so he is available. but at the same time they see Randle as expendable and they don't want to pay him. Thus, they trade Randle, mid level first rounder and ingram and in return they are adding KP and Paul george. Thats unique to their scenario. For that matter, Say its D'angelo russell and Ingram for KP, cuz they have a nice guard to start and see that they are upgrading Two positions (KP and Paul George). For that matter, they draft Lonzo Ball. THey might be upgrading THREE postitions. Do I take a mid first rounder, D'angelo and Ingram? THat could net me three starters and KP while I love the kid, has some risks to him physically. Consolidating talent is an important ingredient to winning. Boston might have to do this at some point to get more cap friendly contracts when their yoots come off scale. So to me, it depends on the team and what they want, not "Fair value". Im not shopping KP. Phil put it out there, but a team is going to have to pay. some can afford to. My concept was like when we traded for Rose. It made sense (go back to july and think a healthy Noah) when you added in free agent noah to replace the trade asset. Anyteam that gets a gift of a free agent can afford to spend. So anyone wants KP, they have to blow knicks away. Doubt it does. But Phil should listen. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
crazy talk. Keep him. Keep developing him. If he was an RFA THIS year dude would be worth a max extension or damn close. He's still got 2 more years to keep getting better.
KP is the building block every team with a draft pick pines for. We just need to keep adding guys. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
What KP doesn't realize is he is being misled, only way this team improves is if he takes control of the team leadership. He needs to set standards that need to be followed he is the source of reference that other will emulate. He should let his basketball accomplishments market him not the other way around.
|
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:No. But I would try to correct the dysfunction that he is frustrated with. You know the saying, "Actions speak louder than words", well his actions have spoken.. ES
|